Re: [dev] [9base] another cosmetic patch

2011-05-22 Thread Anselm R Garbe
On 22 May 2011 01:02, Szabolcs Nagy n...@port70.net wrote: to make diff/Makefile consistent with other Makefiles Thanks, applied.

Re: [dev] Making Apps That Don't Suck by Mike Lee

2011-05-22 Thread Anselm R Garbe
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 09:29:21PM +0200, ilf wrote: On 05-21 11:27, Nick wrote: Indeed. Looks like the flash player is just used to show slides the mp3. You can download the mp3 slides separately from the side, using credentials from http://bugmenot.com/view/infoq.com This should do

Re: [dev] [st] maps window before setting the title, confuses dwm's matching

2011-05-22 Thread Aurélien Aptel
Applied, thanks.

Re: [dev] [dvtm] a series of patches

2011-05-22 Thread Marc Andre Tanner
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 10:29:20PM -0400, Ross Mohn wrote: 1. support for compiling under AIX I have by now pushed most of your changes. However... Index: forkpty-aix.c === --- forkpty-aix.c (.../vendor/current)

[dev] sbase

2011-05-22 Thread Connor Lane Smith
Hey all, I think it's about time we started a minimalist, statically linked set of core utilities. The BSD family are bloated, and the GNU monstrous. Some of us seem to be resorting to using those from Plan 9, which were designed for another operating system and exist on Unix through a

Re: [dev] sbase

2011-05-22 Thread Bryan Bennett
I would suggest first re-writing the ones that 9Base has listed. It seems a relatively exhaustive list and - with our case of NIH - we don't want to be using anything from another OS entirely, now do we ;) I'm pretty excited by this proposition. The idea seems pretty good.

Re: [dev] sbase

2011-05-22 Thread Noah Birnel
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 03:15:43AM +0100, Connor Lane Smith wrote: I think it's about time we started a minimalist, statically linked set of core utilities. The BSD family are bloated, and the GNU monstrous. Cool. Your Makefile, though, is GNU-dependant. cheers Noah

Re: [dev] sbase

2011-05-22 Thread Jens Staal
If you want to replace stuff in a standard distribution with something else I guess it should have the same features as the thing you are replacing (except for the redundant and/or un-needed ones) For fun, I have been trying to replace GNU with Busybox: