Hey all,
I updated the non-blocking and incremental patches to current tip; attached.
I was planning to write an extension patch as well, which would allow
you to say e.g. 'dmenu -xf dmenu_files' and then run a separate
program (such as file completion) when you hit, say, ^X^F, but I
haven't mana
> Anyone
> have any objections / has seen major cookie problems in
> surf?
When I try to download files from our universities online learning
resource I get a permission error. The site is called studip.
+-- Rob ---+
> On 21 November 2011 09:15, Yoshi Rokuko wrote:
> > it seems that i cannot communicate my point - why are vi-styled-key-
> > binding-styled-interfaces so popular?
>
> It's not vi-style, it's Unix. If you come from a Windows
The first applications I remember using this kind of pattern matching
were winamp and web search engines.
On 21 November 2011 09:15, Yoshi Rokuko wrote:
> it seems that i cannot communicate my point - why are vi-styled-key-
> binding-styled-interfaces so popular?
It's not vi-style, it's Unix. If you come from a Windows background, you'll
be used to Ctrl+Backspace to delete a word, or Shift+Home, Back
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 09:59:49 +0100
Yoshi Rokuko wrote:
> +--- Dieter Plaetinck ---+
> > I don't understand... Are you saying "I agree the
> > token matching works fine and is the fastest, but I
> > still want you to implement an inferior and more
> > complicated appro
+--- Connor Lane Smith ---+
> On 20/11/2011, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote:
> > pathnames often contain dots - and IRIs even more so.
> > Reserving the dot is not an option IMHO.
> >
> > Would you ever use character sets or classes in dmenu?
> > I most certainly
+--- Dieter Plaetinck ---+
> I don't understand... Are you saying "I agree the
> token matching works fine and is the fastest, but I
> still want you to implement an inferior and more
> complicated approach (regexes)" ?
i don't want you to implement regexp, i'm quite h
