Re: [dev] suckless shared tools

2016-02-27 Thread robin
> I noticed there's libsl on git.suckless.org Why not have a makefile in libsl? It could install to /usr/local/include/arg.h and so on. All projects using arg.h can #include . > Send patches I wouldnt know if its a good idea to have .a files such as 9base lib9.a. On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at

[dev] unsubscribe

2016-02-27 Thread Mytchel Hammond
unsubscribe

Re: [dev] suckless shared tools

2016-02-27 Thread Daniel Kowalski
On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 20:53:48 -0300 Marc Collin wrote: > I did a one-liner that finds every file named "arg.h", extract their > last modified date, get the "arg.h" that was last modified, and > replace all "arg.h" with this latest version (arg.h from the project > that

Re: [dev] suckless shared tools

2016-02-27 Thread Marc Collin
I did a one-liner that finds every file named "arg.h", extract their last modified date, get the "arg.h" that was last modified, and replace all "arg.h" with this latest version (arg.h from the project that last updated it). This one-line can be run by who has access to all repositories on

Re: [dev] suckless shared tools

2016-02-27 Thread Charlie Kester
On Sat 27 Feb 2016 at 12:14:47 PST Marc Collin wrote: So the idea is to send patches to all arg.h files on different suckless projects when one of them is modified? Wouldn't it be easier to have a more centralized arg.h (and similar tools)? I'm not complaining, I just want to understand the idea

Re: [dev] suckless shared tools

2016-02-27 Thread Marc Collin
But the libsl arg.h is missing Lucas Vuotto's out-of bounds fix.[0] As many other tools on git.suckless.org like quark, xsstate, smdev, sic, ... When someone improves arg.h on a project, is it really supposed for other projects to slowly copy the improvement? It seems to lack coordination. Of

Re: [dev] suckless shared tools

2016-02-27 Thread Anselm R Garbe
On 27 February 2016 at 19:56, Marc Collin wrote: > A few days ago arg.h was update on sbase to fix an out-of bounds error. > After that the same error was fixed (some sooner some later) on lots > of other projects that also have arg.h like ubase, slock, dmenu, st, > and

Re: [dev] suckless shared tools

2016-02-27 Thread Marc Collin
So the idea is to send patches to all arg.h files on different suckless projects when one of them is modified? Wouldn't it be easier to have a more centralized arg.h (and similar tools)? I'm not complaining, I just want to understand the idea you guys have. I noticed there's libsl on

Re: [dev] suckless shared tools

2016-02-27 Thread Dimitris Papastamos
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 03:56:25PM -0300, Marc Collin wrote: > Hello, > A few days ago arg.h was update on sbase to fix an out-of bounds error. > After that the same error was fixed (some sooner some later) on lots > of other projects that also have arg.h like ubase, slock, dmenu, st, > and

Re: [dev] suckless shared tools

2016-02-27 Thread Martti Kühne
People here won't agree on building a framework. cheers! mar77i

[dev] suckless shared tools

2016-02-27 Thread Marc Collin
Hello, A few days ago arg.h was update on sbase to fix an out-of bounds error. After that the same error was fixed (some sooner some later) on lots of other projects that also have arg.h like ubase, slock, dmenu, st, and others. And many tools that use arg.h are still not fixed. Isn't this bad for