[dev] opportunities for dwm docs to suck even less

2016-05-17 Thread Britton Kerin
There are a couple problems: http://dwm.suckless.org/tutorial has: Launching To launch dwm, ideally you should setup a ~/.xinitrc with at least exec dwm. this is arrangement-specific without mentioning the fact. It doesn't work with most session setups on linux at least. It should be changed

Re: [dev] [slock] PAM support

2016-05-17 Thread Jan Christoph Ebersbach
On Mon 16-05-2016 15:52 -0700, Eric Pruitt wrote: > On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 10:38:00PM +0200, Jan Christoph Ebersbach > wrote: > > On Mon 16-05-2016 11:54 -0700, Eric Pruitt wrote: > > > Since PAM configurations typically enforce a delay before you can > > > reauthenticate after an incorrect

Re: [dev] [sup] Bring the simple user privilege escalation tool back home?

2016-05-17 Thread FRIGN
On Tue, 17 May 2016 08:54:19 +0200 Anselm R Garbe wrote: > I can only imagine he meant sandy which I would suggest to be removed asap. Yes sorry, I meant sandy. -- FRIGN

Re: [dev] [sup] Bring the simple user privilege escalation tool back home?

2016-05-17 Thread Anselm R Garbe
On 16 May 2016 at 23:22, Marc André Tanner wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 01:27:40PM +0200, FRIGN wrote: >> I think the vis editor alone is enough bloat in the suckless >> repositories. > > I don't know what vis has to do with the original thread, nonetheless > it would be