Re: [dev] Different versions of suckless libutf

2016-05-31 Thread Connor Lane Smith
On 31 May 2016 at 18:43, FRIGN wrote: > as a quick note, the sbase libutf is probably the most feature-rich one. > The version by cls suffers from multiple issues, even though it might > be the most recent. Strictly speaking they're all by me, since I started it (and sbase) in the

Re: [dev] [dwm] Window not created on external monitor with LibreOffice Impress

2016-05-31 Thread FRIGN
On Tue, 31 May 2016 18:42:45 +0100 Chris Down wrote: Hey Chris, > This is with a heavily patched dwm 6.0[0] and LibreOffice 5.0.6.3. can you also reproduce this bug with vanilla dwm (git upstream!) and the latest stable version of LibreOffice (5.1.2.2)? Cheers FRIGN --

Re: [dev] Different versions of suckless libutf

2016-05-31 Thread FRIGN
On Tue, 31 May 2016 10:25:22 -0300 Marc Collin wrote: Hey Marc, > Looking at libutf, I realised there are many versions? > There's an outdated version on the suckless repo by cls[0]. > Thee's an up-to-date version on cls private github[1]. > There's a fork on sbase[2]. >

[dev] [dwm] Window not created on external monitor with LibreOffice Impress

2016-05-31 Thread Chris Down
In some situations, I'm sadly forced to use a LibreOffice Impress to display pptx files or equivalent. When presenting these, generally I like to have the slides displayed on one monitor, and the presentation notes on another. When connecting an external monitor, it is recognised by LibreOffice

Re: [dev] Different versions of suckless libutf

2016-05-31 Thread Connor Lane Smith
Marc -- I remember now that you emailed me about this, and it must have slipped my mind. Sorry about that. I personally have no strong opinion on what should be done with the different repos, since I consider libutf to be mostly a pet project; and I don't think there's any problem with sbase

[dev] Different versions of suckless libutf

2016-05-31 Thread Marc Collin
Hey suckless. Looking at libutf, I realised there are many versions? There's an outdated version on the suckless repo by cls[0]. Thee's an up-to-date version on cls private github[1]. There's a fork on sbase[2]. Is there a reason for the fragmentation? Which is the prefered libutf version?

[dev] [ubase/sbase] use libutils human.c in df.c, fix bug in humansize()

2016-05-31 Thread a . regenfuss
Hey suckless folks, while reading the code for df.c, I realised it uses a specialised function to print human-readable output, print_human(). It mostly replicates the code of libutils human.c, not yet present in ubase. Here is a patch that replaces print_human() with calls to humansize(). Also,