Re: [dev] [sxiv] Discussion

On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 1:55 PM, FRIGN wrote: > On Wed, 10 Aug 2016 23:33:06 +0200 > Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote: > > Hey Christoph, > >> Everything should be GPLv3, you are right. > > let's not discuss this here. You know my position on the GPL, > and I know yours. >

Re: [dev] [sxiv] Discussion

On Wed, 10 Aug 2016 23:33:06 +0200 Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote: Hey Christoph, > Everything should be GPLv3, you are right. let's not discuss this here. You know my position on the GPL, and I know yours. > Please don’t waste that much resources on viewing a big picture > directory.

Re: [dev] [sxiv] Discussion

Greetings. On Wed, 10 Aug 2016 23:33:06 +0200 FRIGN wrote: > Hello fellow hackers, > > don't take it personally, Bert, but I don't think your project sxiv[0] > belongs to the suckless git-repository. > Not only is it licensed with the GPLv2, which is despicable in itself,

Re: [dev] neatroff

Eli Cohen writes: > I was wondering this. troff is for a lot more than man pages. i did > notice some man files were included, but there's no way to read them. > perhaps nroff would be more appropriate for stali, but i don't know of > a good minimal version. There's always mandoc. But anti-Unix

Re: [dev] neatroff

I was wondering this. troff is for a lot more than man pages. i did notice some man files were included, but there's no way to read them. perhaps nroff would be more appropriate for stali, but i don't know of a good minimal version. i could try writing one, but that would be a lot more work than