Re: [dev] lnano[http|smtp] ipv6

On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 10:14:18PM +0200, FRIGN wrote: > On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 21:53:21 +0200 > Sylvain BERTRAND wrote: > > Hey Sylvain, > > > Added IPv6 to lnanohttp and lnanosmtp: > > how do you expect anyone to use your software when you ship your own > "libc"

Re: [dev] lnano[http|smtp] ipv6

On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 10:14:18PM +0200, FRIGN wrote: > On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 21:53:21 +0200 > Sylvain BERTRAND wrote: > > Hey Sylvain, > > > Added IPv6 to lnanohttp and lnanosmtp: > > how do you expect anyone to use your software when you ship your own > "libc"

Re: [dev] lnano[http|smtp] ipv6

On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 21:53:21 +0200 Sylvain BERTRAND wrote: Hey Sylvain, > Added IPv6 to lnanohttp and lnanosmtp: how do you expect anyone to use your software when you ship your own "libc" called "ulinux"? Why would I use this piece of software when it's unportable

[dev] lnano[http|smtp] ipv6

Hi! Added IPv6 to lnanohttp and lnanosmtp: https://github.com/sylware/lnanohttp https://github.com/sylware/lnanosmtp https://repo.or.cz/lnanosmtp.git https://repo.or.cz/lnanohttp.git cheers, -- Sylvain

Re: [dev] [sbase] about audit

On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 12:34:12 -0300 Marc Collin wrote: Hey Marc, > Yeah, I'm not complaining about the audits, I remember they found > many bugs! It was just a random thing that came to me - normally a > person that makes a mistake will overlook the mistake. But someone >

Re: [dev] [sbase] about audit

>http://git.suckless.org/sbase/tree/TODO >at https://github.com/maandree/sat >awk http://lists.suckless.org/dev/1602/28382.html >bc https://github.com/suiginsoft/bc >diff http://lists.suckless.org/hackers/1603/10326.html >patch http://lists.suckless.org/hackers/1603/10410.html >stty

Re: [dev] [sbase] about audit

On 2016-09-01 18:34, Marc Collin wrote: Since we're talking about sbase already in kind of meta way, I'll post a question here instead of a new email. sbase is basically ready, right? The few missing tools are not yet applied, but were sent to the ML by maandree some months ago (patch, diff and

Re: [dev] [sbase] about audit

Yeah, I'm not complaining about the audits, I remember they found many bugs! It was just a random thing that came to me - normally a person that makes a mistake will overlook the mistake. But someone from the outside should spot it more easily. I don't even know if this is true, but I think it is

Re: [dev] [sbase] about audit

On 2016-09-01 17:46, Marc Collin wrote: Hey guys. The missing brackets on paste.c that I talked about on the last message revealed something else to me. It was introduced in commit cdbc0d50356a0f7e0dd5755e3c46593a947cf029 by FRIGN, 2015-01-29. Then it was marked as audited and correct in

Re: [dev] [sbase] about audit

On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 11:46:36 -0300 Marc Collin wrote: Hey Marc, > The missing brackets on paste.c that I talked about on the last > message revealed something else to me. > > It was introduced in commit cdbc0d50356a0f7e0dd5755e3c46593a947cf029 > by FRIGN, 2015-01-29. >

[dev] [sbase] about audit

Hey guys. The missing brackets on paste.c that I talked about on the last message revealed something else to me. It was introduced in commit cdbc0d50356a0f7e0dd5755e3c46593a947cf029 by FRIGN, 2015-01-29. Then it was marked as audited and correct in commit

[dev] [sbase] [paste.c] misleading indentation?

Hey guys. I was warned by the compiler about a misleading indentation and I think its right. http://git.suckless.org/sbase/tree/paste.c#n70 It's missing brackets or last++ must lose 1 level of indentation. I think the first. Right? Best wishes.