urxvt's daemon mode does not give many benefits. It groups terminals
together , so less memory consumption. And It's supposed to be faster,
this part I'm not sure though.
Burhan
On 21 June 2017 at 21:19, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> i tried urxvt's daemon mode. it doesn't offer any benefit.
i tried urxvt's daemon mode. it doesn't offer any benefit. i'm also a
bit ashamed now that i wasted that time trying, could have known, by
principle instead of experience.
> > And also will there be any daemon mode available for st?
>
> My guess is: no, never.
One good solution would be to have it in the Cloud™
> And also will there be any daemon mode available for st?
My guess is: no, never.
With HISTSIZE being 2000 memory consumed is around 8MiB
And for 4 it's 120MiB. This is a large number for terminal.
Whereas for urxvt I set saveLines to 65000 and it consumes less around
8MiB. It increases when I have more lines in scrollback .
So my question is if there's a patch that can
