On Fri, 29 Sep 2017, Anselm Garbe wrote:
> Not sure who came up with that conclusion. Granted, you can solve many
> problems surprinsingly well with plain C. But I consider Go as a
> suckless option because of:
>
> - The only OO-way almost done right
> - CSP
> - statically linked binaries
>
> The
On 23 September 2017 at 01:51, wrote:
> This topic was discussed earlier: no, go is not worth it. It's really a bad
> compromise against simple and explicit C. Wrong again: simple and explicit C
> is
Not sure who came up with that conclusion. Granted, you can solve many
problems surprinsingly we
