Laslo,
* Laslo Hunhold 2018-03-24 13:00
> most of the deep learning folks don't know what the hell they're doing
> and it will cost us big time in the near or far future.
> Just throwing data at a problem you do not understand will get you
> better results but won't solve the fundamental issue of
On Sat, 24 Mar 2018 12:01:02 +0100
s...@mailless.org wrote:
Dear ssd,
> I'm sure that the deep learning folks will object: factorising in sub
> problemswas yesterday; now we ge end-to-end. And indeed there are a
> few examples where a field was swept by NN in short time (e.g.
> vision), at least
* Laslo Hunhold 2018-03-22 13:59
> When reflecting about a problem, it should be a priority to think about
> how it can be split up. In this case, we can talk about two problems,
> which combined, solve the "voice assistant" problem.
>
>1) voice recognition
>2) assistant
I'm sure that
