> I don’t think it makes sense for the suckless guys to try trimming down that
> bloated mess (Linux kernel).
>
> To be honest I’m wondering if the love they give OpenBSD, as a desktop OS, is
> misplaced. OpenBSD is 22M lines if you include the entirety of the files, and
> 16M counting just
pon., 12 kwi 2021 o 20:36 Sagar Acharya napisał(a):
>
>
>
> > I don’t think it makes sense for the suckless guys to try trimming down
> > that bloated mess (Linux kernel).
> >
> > To be honest I’m wondering if the love they give OpenBSD, as a desktop OS,
> > is misplaced. OpenBSD is 22M lines
I too agree with Hiltjo. I don't think suckless is Linux oriented.
At the time of writing that article, I thought Linux and BSD are the only 2
usable kernels. Practically it seems so, but recently I saw microkernel vs
monolithic kernel debate and got interested in seL4. I'm not sure whether
> On Apr 11, 2021, at 11:22 PM, Daniel Cegiełka
> wrote:
>
>> Choose an OS which has a small kernel and other minimal software
>> that you need. (OpenBSD is the only one I can see here today)
>
> suckless is strongly Linux-oriented - musl, ubase, smdev, nldev, nlmon
>
> I wonder if it would
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 08:22:18AM +0200, Daniel Cegiełka wrote:
> > Choose an OS which has a small kernel and other minimal software
> > that you need. (OpenBSD is the only one I can see here today)
>
> suckless is strongly Linux-oriented - musl, ubase, smdev, nldev, nlmon
>
No, there are also
> Choose an OS which has a small kernel and other minimal software
> that you need. (OpenBSD is the only one I can see here today)
suckless is strongly Linux-oriented - musl, ubase, smdev, nldev, nlmon
I wonder if it would make sense to make a little Linux kernel.
Everything that is unnecessary
