Re: [dev][st] UTF-8 works on debian, but not on PopOS Ubuntu

2022-04-25 Thread Quentin Rameau
Hi Robert, > LC_CTYPE is set correctly to "en_US.UTF-8" Set how? > I compiled the same st code on Debian 11 (Bullseye) and Pop OS! (Ubuntu > 21.10). On Debian, UTF-8 works fine, on Pop OS!, with the same keyboard, > it doesn't. In both cases, UTF-8 works in lxterminal. Could you explain your ac

[dev][st] UTF-8 works on debian, but not on PopOS Ubuntu

2022-04-25 Thread Robert Winkler
With the risk of annoying the experts (but lacking UTF-8 is a show stopper for me, since I write a lot in Spanish and German..). I compiled the same st code on Debian 11 (Bullseye) and Pop OS! (Ubuntu 21.10). On Debian, UTF-8 works fine, on Pop OS!, with the same keyboard, it doesn't. In both case

Re: [dev] [dwm] possible regression in 8806b6e

2022-04-25 Thread Ethan Marshall
Completely fixed. All affected windows now behave as they did before the patch - so, problem solved on my end. Thanks for all your help Chris. Ethan

[dev] [dwm] Window mapping

2022-04-25 Thread Ivan J .
Hello, I'd like to submit the following patch to the list of dwm patches, but before that I thought I could gather some comments and see if it could be improved in any way. The basic goal is, instead of moving windows out of sight, to do proper window (un)mapping in order for some external program

Re: [dev] [dwm] possible regression in 8806b6e

2022-04-25 Thread Chris Down
Hiltjo Posthuma writes: Whats the similar issue exactly? Does this issue also happen when bisecting the same commit (so its a also regression)? For 8806b6e23793 ("manage: propertynotify: Reduce cost of unused size hints"), the issue is that c->isfixed may not be set early, which might affect w

Re: [dev] [dwm] possible regression in 8806b6e

2022-04-25 Thread Jochen Sprickerhof
* Hiltjo Posthuma [2022-04-25 18:13]: On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 04:00:21PM +0200, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote: Hi Chris, * Chris Down [2022-04-25 14:47]: > I'm still unable to reproduce the issue, but I am curious, does this fix > things? :-) > > diff --git a/dwm.c b/dwm.c > index 0fc328a..f2a10c0

Re: [dev] [dwm] possible regression in 8806b6e

2022-04-25 Thread Hiltjo Posthuma
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 04:00:21PM +0200, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote: > Hi Chris, > > * Chris Down [2022-04-25 14:47]: > > I'm still unable to reproduce the issue, but I am curious, does this fix > > things? :-) > > > > diff --git a/dwm.c b/dwm.c > > index 0fc328a..f2a10c0 100644 > > --- a/dwm.c >

Re: [dev] [dwm] possible regression in 8806b6e

2022-04-25 Thread Jochen Sprickerhof
Hi Chris, * Chris Down [2022-04-25 14:47]: I'm still unable to reproduce the issue, but I am curious, does this fix things? :-) diff --git a/dwm.c b/dwm.c index 0fc328a..f2a10c0 100644 --- a/dwm.c +++ b/dwm.c @@ -1061,6 +1061,7 @@ manage(Window w, XWindowAttributes *wa) XSetWindowBord

Re: [dev] [dwm] possible regression in 8806b6e

2022-04-25 Thread Chris Down
Hi Ethan, I'm still unable to reproduce the issue, but I am curious, does this fix things? :-) diff --git a/dwm.c b/dwm.c index 0fc328a..f2a10c0 100644 --- a/dwm.c +++ b/dwm.c @@ -1061,6 +1061,7 @@ manage(Window w, XWindowAttributes *wa) XSetWindowBorder(dpy, w, scheme[SchemeNorm][ColB