Re: [dev] C variants, compilers and completeness

2023-08-01 Thread LM
On Mon 24 Jul 2023, Sagar Acharya wrote: > I see C compilers recommended by suckless are: > > tinycc > simplecc > cproc > qbe > lacc > > Which variant of C do they offer? What are the differences and do they offer > sufficient features to express with a program completely? I tried to check if

Re: [dev] Announcing a couple small X11 utilities

2023-08-01 Thread Yan Doroshenko
Hello, I've addressed most of your concerns, please check the attached patch and let me know what else can be done. Regards, Yan On 7/31/23 11:44, NRK wrote: Hi Yan, On Sat, Jul 29, 2023 at 02:46:29PM +0200, Yan Doroshenko wrote: I've created a patch for sxot that adds a -m

Re: [dev] C variants, compilers and completeness

2023-08-01 Thread Pontus Stenetorp
On Mon 24 Jul 2023, Sagar Acharya wrote: > > I see C compilers recommended by suckless are: > > tinycc > simplecc > cproc > qbe > lacc > > Which variant of C do they offer? What are the differences and do they offer > sufficient features to express with a program completely? Whether they are

Re: [dev] sbm dmenu bookmarker

2023-08-01 Thread Страхиња Радић
On 23/07/31 08:15AM, Randy Palamar wrote: > `grep -v -e '#' -e '^$' $BOOKMARKS | dmenu -i -l 20 | cut -f 1 -d ' '` > > Then I pipe it to the clipboard or a plumber script depending > on what I want to do with it (bound to a keybind in dwm). > > To add bookmarks I either use a text editor or just

Re: [dev] sbm dmenu bookmarker

2023-08-01 Thread Spenser Truex
Thanks for your feedbacks, however, the script bm is the simplification/attempted improvement of of bmks which I got from some unknown source (apologies if you are the uncredited author). -- CAEE B377 FC82 BAF9 102C D22F C5CE D003 1AA8 E281 Spenser Truexhttps://equwal.com signature.asc