Hi Greg,
On 2024-03-09 15:34, Greg Reagle wrote:
I have an epub ebook. It is a novel, but when I get this process working, I
want to repeat it for any epub ebook.
I want to read it, with formatting (such as underline or italics), with less.
I am happy to use any software that exists in the
Hello Spenser,
You could just install e.g. runit and use it to run quark.
With Debian it would be the 'runit-run' package.
Best Regards,
Georg
On 5/30/23 04:37, Spenser Truex wrote:
My $10/yr VPS host Racknerd ungraciously requires that I'd make a support
ticket in order to get a custom
Hi LM,
Monitoring always sucks 8-]
I settled on collectd[1], which ".. has been reported as working on .. AIX".
To "unsuck" it a little bit, I compile from sources and leave out every
plugin I do not need. My sample "./configure" is below, you might want
to leave out even more (chrony,
Hi,
The topic of header dependency tracking is already addressed since the
inception of redo by DJB.
The Appenwarr documentation offers a fairly simple answer in the form of
an "implicit" .do file for object files.
---
cat > default.o.do <2. build the object file and generate a
Hello,
Does nobuf(1) help?
http://jdebp.uk/Softwares/djbwares/guide/nobuf.html
Note: it tackles exactly the POSIX feature to line buffer output to
tty's by providing one to the program in the pipeline, but without using
any shared-object magic.
Have not used it (yet) though.
Best
Just a heads up,
I tampered around with redo-c. Find it at
https://github.com/jorge-leon/redo-c
It:
- Captures stdout of do files in the target file.
- Does not create an empty target if $3 is empty. This allows for
"phony" targets and protects against silly mistakes.
- Truncates targets
Hi Sergey,
You might have overlooked, that jdebp not only did a documentation of
redo, but also provides a C++ implementation:
http://jdebp.eu/Softwares/redo/
Best Regards,
Georg
On 12/17/20 7:44 PM, Sergey Matveev wrote:
Greetings!
I see that redo subject was already there before:
On 4/5/20 2:58 PM, Greg Reagle wrote:
On Sun, Apr 5, 2020, at 06:57, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 12:11:09 +0200
Georg Lehner wrote:
A question: why is the scrollback-patch not included in `st` already
exactly my point. I see no reason why there can't at least be a
scrollback
On 4/3/20 9:17 AM, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 21:14:11 +0200
Georg Lehner wrote:
Dear Georg,
...
at this point, why not just use the scrollback-patch?
With best regards
Laslo
Finally I felt nudged to test the scrollback patches. Nice work!
Two of the patches failed
I just figured out, that `st` already has an unlimited scrollback buffer
- kind of.
Run `st -o /tmp/unlimited_scrollbackbuffer`.
Than inside the `st` terminal, you can `less`, `vi` ... whatever you want.
For a starter try: `less -r +G /tmp/unlimited_scrollbackbuffer`
Of course it makes sense
10 matches
Mail list logo
