> I've heard of se before, however was never able to build it. Such a shame
> that a small project like this (5K loc) uses auto* hell configure and make
> for no reason.
Agreed.
> If anybody wants to go and fix the build let me know of your fork or
> patch as I want to try it, out of curiosity.
> Jonathan Bakke wrote:
> Daniel Littlewood wrote:
> > From the other end, there is always ed.
>
> I use ed. Each tool is specialized, though.
>
> I prefer vi-like editing for fixing typos. Having visual feedback
> drastically reduces errors from commands like sed.
You might like se[1]. It's a
Hi Janek,
> After trying surf recently, I was appalled to see a ".surf"
> directory in my home. Is XDG basedir compliance not natural in
> suckless software?
dmenu is the only suckless software I know that does anything related
to the XDG basedir spec. I think the suckless way is to implement
> I'm very glad to announce libgrapheme[0], a library for handling grapheme
> clusters.
To avoid Warnock's dilemma, let me just say that this looks excellent. The
API and implementation is clean and focused. Thank you for publishing this
library.
> Anybody else enjoying Go? Or hating it?
I've been writing Go code daily for about six years now. Overall I
like it. It sucks less than most languages I've worked with.
I enjoy that the language has stayed small (~80 page spec) and the
developers have declined nearly all feature requests for
