On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Mattias Andrée wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> I'm working a non-graphical video editor. However, I need a
> proper name for the project, and I have no idea what to call
> it, so I'm taking suggestions from you.
>
> A non-graphical video editor may sound a bit insane. Ther
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 7:54 PM, Eric Pruitt wrote:
> Assuming you're serious, I've never used X11 with Cygwin and I am
> curious: how well did using dwm work? Do Windows' windows still behave
> in a relatively reasonable manner, and are the window decorations
> stripped or preserved?
>
> Eric
>
I first started using dwm because it was the only tiling window
manager I could get to compile on cygwin.
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Louis Santillan wrote:
> I meant Windows 8/10 "Metro UI".
>
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 02:11:15PM
> Pay attention when things seem too slow or, in your words, feel too
> clunky. That's telling you there's a rough edge you need to smooth
> down. But once it's fixed and no longer bothering you, there's really
> no need to go on fussing over it.
>
I'll echo that, but suggest that maybe what you
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 04:00:14PM +0100, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> Windows has to
> adapt to Open Source and not the other way around.
Hahahahaha.
You live in a wonderful world.
Cheers,
Noah
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 11:29:30AM +0100, FRIGN wrote:
> However, I don't consider this good coding-style and there are quite a
> few areas which could be improved.
> So Markus, if you want a serious response from us, you maybe should
> start writing more "serious code" ;).
>
That's what he asked
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 11:14:43AM +0200, Manolo Martínez wrote:
> I was trying to create a shortcut to launch new terminals in my current
> working directory. I've seen there's a two year-old thread, and a patch,
> about this, which probably means that the kind of easy solutions I've been
> tryin
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 07:11:12PM -0700, Charlie Paul wrote:
> > Write your UI as a Web application.
> That wouldn't work, as movement needs to be low latency.
>
It needn't be a remote server, if the idea appeals otherwise.
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 02:30:12PM -0700, Charlie Paul wrote:
> I don't
>want to have to install a dynamic language to do Tk.
Why? Can't control your deployment environment, don't have the resources,
doesn't feel pure to you? Something else?
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 06:12:08PM -0400, Carlos Torres wrote:
>You could/should try swk
Got a link?
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 09:11:28AM +0200, Martti K??hne wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Martti K??hne wrote:
> >
> > http://sprunge.us/fQDC?js
>
> Well, uh, context: Someone complained to me they don't want to
> activate javascript for viewing a pastebin, refering to sprunge...
> Bayesia
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 11:14:44PM +0100, Nick wrote:
> a pager that you pipe text into, with tcl/tk, and I think
> it's quite good (with tk 8.5 - everything is ugly with 8.5). It's
> attached.
I'd like to see it, but there's no attachment.
-Noah
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 09:15:15PM +0200, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> Fighting for the freedom of everyone should be a common hobby of the av???
> erage intellectual.
>
>
> But there are other ways to scramble your IP and connect to OFTC. Just
> don???t let the average idiot know about how t
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 05:31:26PM +0200, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> > XML is for the file listing. :-)
> > https://s3-ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com/krkl
>
> That link is a crime against humanity and progress. It???s like giving
> bibles to children.
No, the style is not as good.
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 08:26:37PM +0200, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> Greetings comrades,
>
> Anyone has built binaries on Windows of suckless projects and may pro???
> vide a wiki page about how it was done.
Greetings from the cygwin ghetto!
No wiki page, but:
dwm, dmenu, and st all build jus
> People use windows because they don't know any better.
If most people are using it, there start to be reasons other than
ignorance. For instance, in legal discovery, we don't have the privilege
of telling the judge: "Sorry, this evidence was generated by people
using lousy software on a lousy O
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:59:46AM -0400, Max DeLiso wrote:
> A) That's stupid
Misguided instead? Very few people who would appreciate a simple
terminal are likely to be using Windows. (I'm one of them.) I doubt
you'll get many competent coders to contribute. (I'm not one of
them.) And it's such a
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 04:29:59PM +1100, Sam Watkins wrote:
>
> What is the shortest shell command you can write,
> that replaces $A with $B in a text stream for any A and B?
>
A1="$(printf '%s' "$A" | sed 's,",\\",g; s,\\,,g')"
B1="$(printf '%s' "$B" | sed 's,",\\",g; s,\\,,g')"
awk '{
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 01:08:15AM +1100, Sam Watkins wrote:
> anyway, I say stick with counting bytes, for better performance!
Performance before correctness! Yay!
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 06:20:03PM +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> -> is there anyone who uses the mouse functionality of the dwm bar
> right now? Could you live without it?
Yes. No.
I use dwm to manage 10-15 simultaneous RDP sessions. Since RDP eats all
keystrokes, the mouse is the only way to sw
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 07:00:33PM +0200, hiro wrote:
> I don't get it, are you calibrating your printer so that it matches
> the display instead?
>
No. The printer and the monitor are not going to match. There is no
hope for that. What matters to us is the print.
I am not arguing that no one sho
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 04:14:06PM +0100, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> Well, the thing is, I don't ever use the mouse for window management,
> but I sometimes move the mouse out of the way and in doing so
> accidentally focus a completely different window.
unclutter?
http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/X11/
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 06:00:49PM +0200, Pieter Praet wrote:
> Color calibration [1] (and frequent recalibration) is mandatory when
> doing *anything* graphics-related for production purposes, as the output
> of any and every visual output device known to man *will* be distorted,
> due to used mat
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 09:32:43AM -0400, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> it is impossible to rename a file
Har. Yes, sometimes I want to to rename some arbitrarily named files.
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 03:45:11PM +0800, Patrick Haller wrote:
> file manager
> = file selection + file (pre)viewing
> = ls/awk/$EDITOR + i_give_my_files_retarded_names
> => fix your naming convention
>
Really? You never work with files created and named by other people? And
all
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 04:25:40PM +0100, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> With the exception of image thumbnails, icons are really completely pointless.
>
+1
> My thoughts on a suckless file manager, though my file manager is 'ls':
>
> Orthodox: two paned, plus command line. At compile time you just
> *Please*, use sane keybindings. Emacs and vi were made with a specific
> keyboard from the 70s in mind. A time were the hjkl keys had little
> arrows on them. A triangle layout (wqsd or ijkl for example) is much
> easier to type.
Puke. Triangle layout may be more intuitive to learn for single ch
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:05:55AM +0100, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
>
> On 23 May 2011 04:36, Noah Birnel wrote:
> > Your Makefile, though, is GNU-dependant.
>
> Really, which part? It seems to work with NetBSD make.
>
On FreeBSD, make does
CC -c util.c
and nothing e
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 03:15:43AM +0100, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> I think it's about time we started a minimalist, statically linked set
> of core utilities. The BSD family are bloated, and the GNU monstrous.
Cool.
Your Makefile, though, is GNU-dependant.
cheers
Noah
Anyone know any fairly suckless techniques for keeping a garden journal? I
tried
pacman -Ss garden
and
apt-cache search garden
and found nothing of use... I don't just want a calendar or
cat >> garden_journal
but something to let me compare planting dates, yields etc over the
years. For now I
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 11:06:40AM -0700, Suraj Kurapati wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 7:54 PM, Suraj Kurapati wrote:
> Alternatively, in simple shell scripts (for which writing a manpage
> would be overkill), I simply print the script file's comment header
> using sed(1):
>
> #!/bin/sh
> # yo
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 02:08:32PM +0200, nico wrote:
> Changing the sed command to something more complex would surely work
...and not generate all this noise.
noah
> > I am actually a student that used to work on this stuff. In our
> > research group, we were mainly interested in transforming the arXiv (
> > www.arxiv.org) to XHTML + MathML via LaTeXML (
> > http://dlmf.nist.gov/LaTeXML/ )
>
> What you are doing is a truly evil thing. A certainly interesting
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 01:35:22AM +0400, Ilya Ilembitov wrote:
>...Facebook...
You are using an incompatible web browser.
Sorry, we're not cool enough to support your browser. Please keep it real
with one of the following browsers:
* Mozilla Firefox
* Safari
* Microsoft
On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 01:03:55PM -0400, n...@lavabit.com wrote:
> Semi unrelated question: why are so many people at suckless using ` `
> instead of $( ) ? I've seen it here, dmenu_path, surf's config.h... etc.
>
> $( ) only fails in very, very old shells... think original bourne
I use backti
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 02:59:17PM +, Nick wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 06:46:37AM -0800, Noah Birnel wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 01:18:51PM +0100, pancake wrote:
> > >
> > > http://code.google.com/p/equanime
> >
> > Not Found
> > T
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 01:18:51PM +0100, pancake wrote:
> > sounds interesting
> > link/more info?
> >
>
> http://code.google.com/p/equanime
Not Found
The requested URL /p/equanim/ was not found on this server.
Typo? Or is it gone?
--Noah
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 04:49:52PM +0100, sta...@cs.tu-berlin.de wrote:
>... a mobile phone with integrated camera,
> touch screen, 'apps' for learning languages, etc. is as much suckless as an
> axe with a door bell, toilet paper and nuclear power generator.
>
At this point a mobile phone is a
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 07:43:22AM +, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> In my observation one should stick to one platform, which is nowadays
> Linux+common libraries (most of the time) when packaging some source
> code. In >90% of all cases it will work fine, because the other 95% of
> users use Linux a
I'll stick with dwm too, but the crippled tiling window manager would
be a vast improvement for most users, who don't want to spend the time
to learn dwm / xmonad etc, but are spending vast amounts of time
managing their windows by hand. I think it's a worthwhile project.
The touchpad, however, lo
40 matches
Mail list logo
