Re: [dev] cat unique deice identifier e.g. serial number

2012-02-08 Thread Premysl Hruby
On 08/02/12 12:50, hiro wrote: Anybody know a simple way to get a laptops device's serial number or some other unique identifier which won''t identify all other same models? So far I came up with this: ( for MA in `ls /sys/bus/pci/devices/*/modalias` do cat $MA;

[dev] [sic] null pointer in printf

2010-05-24 Thread Premysl Hruby
Hi, in sic, if you use cmd :m something it will use null pointer as %s in printf (in function privmsg), which is obviously bad idea (segfault or, as in case of glibc it send unnecessary string (null). For fix, see patch: diff -r 503b48b13a77 sic.c --- a/sic.c Tue Jul 29 19:22:08 2008 +0100

Re: [dev] dmenu_path rewrite in C

2010-05-19 Thread Premysl Hruby
On (19/05/10 12:58), Elmo Todurov wrote: Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 12:58:16 +0300 From: Elmo Todurov todu...@gmail.com To: dev mail list dev@suckless.org Subject: Re: [dev] dmenu_path rewrite in C User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100330 Shredder/3.0.4

Re: [dev] dmenu_path rewrite in C

2010-05-19 Thread Premysl Hruby
at 12:09:33PM +0200, Premysl Hruby wrote: Conclusion: 0.7 seconds is somewhat noticeable lag. It's another question whether it's worth the effort to write the C program, but hey, it's been done already. Well, I (and others possibly) have no concern about cache miss, my files in $PATH

Re: [dev] dmenu_path rewrite in C

2010-05-19 Thread Premysl Hruby
On (19/05/10 12:32), pancake wrote: Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 12:32:06 +0200 From: pancake panc...@youterm.com To: dev@suckless.org Subject: Re: [dev] dmenu_path rewrite in C X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; i686-pc-linux-gnu) List-Id: dev mail list dev.suckless.org in my laptop

Re: [dev] Fwd: Thank you for your application

2010-03-18 Thread Premysl Hruby
On (18/03/10 20:26), Martin Kopta wrote: Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:26:32 +0100 From: Martin Kopta mar...@kopta.eu To: dev mail list dev@suckless.org Subject: Re: [dev] Fwd: Thank you for your application List-Id: dev mail list dev.suckless.org User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) What

Re: [dev] [OFFTOPIC] How to know the size of a process?

2010-01-24 Thread Premysl Hruby
On (24/01/10 18:35), pmarin wrote: Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 18:35:31 +0100 From: pmarin pacog...@gmail.com To: dev@suckless.org Subject: [dev] [OFFTOPIC] How to know the size of a process? List-Id: dev mail list dev.suckless.org Hi all. Anyone know how to know the size (kb) of a process in

Re: [dev] [OFFTOPIC] How to know the size of a process?

2010-01-24 Thread Premysl Hruby
/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) On Sun 24 Jan 2010 at 09:42:59 PST Premysl Hruby wrote: Btw, There's one issue with trying to get size of process -- shared memory. To which process should it count? And how? Or count only fraction for each of process using that shared memory ... Not easy

Re: [dev] [SLOCK] is not safe

2010-01-20 Thread Premysl Hruby
On (20/01/10 10:57), anonymous wrote: Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 10:57:41 +0300 From: anonymous aim0s...@lavabit.com To: dev mail list dev@suckless.org Subject: Re: [dev] [SLOCK] is not safe List-Id: dev mail list dev.suckless.org Problem here is not using exec startx or startx exit, not

Re: [dev] [SLOCK] is not safe

2010-01-19 Thread Premysl Hruby
On (19/01/10 12:05), Nico Golde wrote: Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 12:05:07 +0100 From: Nico Golde n...@ngolde.de To: dev@suckless.org Subject: Re: [dev] [SLOCK] is not safe List-Id: dev mail list dev.suckless.org X-Mailer: netcat 1.10 Hi, * Andres Perera andres...@gmail.com [2010-01-18

Re: [dev] [SLOCK] is not safe

2010-01-17 Thread Premysl Hruby
On (17/01/10 15:51), Rob wrote: Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 15:51:26 + From: Rob robpill...@gmail.com To: dev mail list dev@suckless.org Subject: Re: [dev] [SLOCK] is not safe List-Id: dev mail list dev.suckless.org Hi, I'm using slock and i am suprised to realize that is not safe at

Re: [dev] [PATCH] dwm -- Proper SIGCHLD usage , fix issue with uncollected processes

2009-08-12 Thread Premysl Hruby
On (12/08/09 17:24), Jukka Salmi wrote: Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:24:24 +0200 From: Jukka Salmi j+...@2009.salmi.ch To: dev@suckless.org Subject: Re: [dev] [PATCH] dwm -- Proper SIGCHLD usage , fix issue with uncollected processes List-Id: dev mail list dev.suckless.org User-Agent:

Re: [dev] dwm default bindings

2009-07-23 Thread Premysl Hruby
On (22/07/09 10:30), Donald Allen wrote: Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:30:34 -0400 From: Donald Allen donaldcal...@gmail.com To: dev mail list dev@suckless.org Subject: [dev] dwm default bindings List-Id: dev mail list dev.suckless.org I think the default key bindings for dwm are a unfortunate

Re: [dev] unsubscribe

2009-06-21 Thread Premysl Hruby
On (21/06/09 08:39), Randy Morris wrote: To: dev mail list dev@suckless.org From: Randy Morris randy.mor...@archlinux.us Subject: Re: [dev] unsubscribe Reply-To: dev mail list dev@suckless.org List-Id: dev mail list dev.suckless.org User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) On Sun, Jun 21,

Re: [dev] dwm only?

2009-05-24 Thread Premysl Hruby
On (24/05/09 23:30), bill lam wrote: To: dev@suckless.org From: bill lam cbill@gmail.com Subject: Re: [dev] dwm only? Mail-Followup-To: dev@suckless.org Reply-To: dev mail list dev@suckless.org List-Id: dev mail list dev.suckless.org User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-04-29) On Sun, 24