> Yeah you make a strong argument. I too think a linting tool would be
> useful. I imagine it would function like shellcheck does for shells. If
> nothing else it would really help people identify GNU extensions vs
> portable behavior.
Something like shellcheck would be awesome! Given that the
>I agree that it shall be added to all Makefile, because
>otherwise the behavior of make is unspecified.
>(Quote from the POSIX specifications)
I'm sure you meant it like that, but just to clarify it:
It is only unspecified if it doesn't appear as the first non-comment line,
has prerequisites or
Hi,
I'm wondering why the Makefiles of some suckless programs (and libs) have the
special target `.POSIX` in them and some don't.
For example, dwm doesn't have it in it's Makefile but there isn't a single
non-POSIX feature used. I think it would be better to include the `.POSIX`
target
simply to
