was thinking it was in manage(), under /* geometry */, but I'm unsure.
From: jthids...@outlook.com
To: dev@suckless.org
Subject: RE: [dev] [DWM] Patch: stack mfact
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 16:38:02 +0100
Hey Brian,
Indeed, I use pertag2 myself. It's an easy fix
increased smfact
too much.
Please test this new version and as always, I'll be looking forward to your
feedback and critiscism!
PS: still sorry for my not-text-only-emails.
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2013 17:47:46 +0200
Subject: Re: [dev] [DWM] Patch: stack mfact
From: garb...@gmail.com
To: dev
30 clients.
I tried disabling html email, but I can't find anything in the settings.
I'll do a search later today to see if I missed something. Sorry guys!
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 13:21:42 +
Subject: Re: [dev] [DWM] Patch: stack mfact
From: raphla...@gmail.com
To: dev@suckless.org
: jthids...@outlook.com
To: dev@suckless.org
Subject: RE: [dev] [DWM] Patch: stack mfact
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 15:25:12 +0100
I just noticed that if we open too much clients in a vanilla dwm.c, they
will be floating by default. This could be the best way to handle this.
Attached
is that makes a
new client float top left of the monitor?
I was thinking it was in manage(), under /* geometry */, but I'm unsure.
From: jthids...@outlook.com
To: dev@suckless.org
Subject: RE: [dev] [DWM] Patch: stack mfact
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 16:38:02 +0100
Hey Brian,
Indeed, I use
The only two ways to consistently handle too many windows in tiling
mode is either killing new windows after a point, or to icon them...
handling _NET_WM_STATE False is more code, I think, but we could offer
both flavors as combo patch.
Or, we could incorporate another patch of mine if we are getting too many
clients in the stack: http://dwm.suckless.org/patches/deck
Improvements to my initial version are very much welcome!
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 10:53:10 +0100
Subject: Re: [dev] [DWM] Patch: stack mfact
From: mysat
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Jente Hidskes jthids...@outlook.com wrote:
Or, we could incorporate another patch of mine if we are getting too many
clients in the stack: http://dwm.suckless.org/patches/deck
Improvements to my initial version are very much welcome!
neat. will check your
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Jente Hidskes jthids...@outlook.com wrote:
Or, we could incorporate another patch of mine if we are getting too many
clients in the stack: http://dwm.suckless.org/patches/deck
I don't really understand the point of combining a patch that makes clients
in the
I'm using? Could be some Outlook thing,
but over here I'm reading Times New Roman.
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 12:48:21 +
Subject: Re: [dev] [DWM] Patch: stack mfact
From: raphla...@gmail.com
To: dev@suckless.org
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Jente Hidskes jthids...@outlook.com wrote
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Jente Hidskes jthids...@outlook.com wrote:
Also, I'm not sure what typewriter font I'm using? Could be some Outlook
thing, but over here I'm reading Times New Roman.
[1].
cheers!
mar77i
[1] http://www.asciiribbon.org/
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Jente Hidskes jthids...@outlook.com wrote:
I meant that once we would resize clients too much (which causes the crash)
we could simply 'hide' them 'underneath' the stack, like the deck layout
does. Could you elaborate on the nstack approach? I'm not fully
, but I can't find anything in the settings. I'll
do a search later today to see if I missed something. Sorry guys!
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 13:21:42 +
Subject: Re: [dev] [DWM] Patch: stack mfact
From: raphla...@gmail.com
To: dev@suckless.org
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Jente Hidskes
= 10; /* Minimal heigt of a client
for smfact */
Let me know what you think of this approach!
From: jthids...@outlook.com
To: dev@suckless.org
Subject: RE: [dev] [DWM] Patch: stack mfact
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 15:13:37 +0100
I went ahead and tried hiding the client a la deck
Hm, seems like there was still a crash in the previous version which I also
forgot to actually attach. I do think this is the cleanest way to circumvent
the crashing. Let me know what you think!
From: jthids...@outlook.com
To: dev@suckless.org
Subject: RE: [dev] [DWM] Patch: stack mfact
Date
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Jente Hidskes jthids...@outlook.com wrote:
First of all, when there is an X number of clients in the stack and smfact
(stackmfact) is increased too much, it will crash DWM. This could be fixed
by having setsmfact() detect the amount of stacked clients and having
this bottom client. I
guess anyone could easily modify the patch so it works from the top client up,
should they want to do so.
I have attached the new version. Again, I look forward to hearing your feedback!
Greetings,
Jente
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 08:41:50 +
Subject: Re: [dev] [DWM] Patch
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Jente Hidskes jthids...@outlook.com wrote:
You're right - I should not have submitted the patch with a bug that would
crash DWM. However, it was only with seven clients or more and as I rarely
have more than 3 open at once, for me it wasn't that big of an issue.
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Raphael Proust raphla...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Jente Hidskes jthids...@outlook.com wrote:
You're right - I should not have submitted the patch with a bug that would
crash DWM. However, it was only with seven clients or more and as I
in the stack) should not be
included by default, but perhaps someone here with a better knowledge in DWM
can fix this another way.
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 11:03:28 -0400
Subject: Re: [dev] [DWM] Patch: stack mfact
From: vlaadbr...@gmail.com
To: dev@suckless.org
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:41 AM
Hello everyone,
I have yesterday written a patch for DWM that enables resizing clients
vertically in the stack. I got quite a few remarks from people who said they
found it useful, so I thought it might be applied upstream. It's quite simple,
but does have some limitations/issues:
First of
21 matches
Mail list logo
