On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 09:43:41PM +0200, Quentin Rameau wrote:
The font size is actually a double and can have non-integer values when
fonts are specified in point size instead of pixel size. Update zoom
functions to preserve the fractional component in a float. Some small
precision is
On Fri, 12 Jun 2015 11:34:26 -0700
Matthew Wesley wes...@google.com wrote:
Hey Matthew,
Added Google to the LICENSE to the copyright list to meet our legal
requirements.
we had this discussion before and the reasons have already been told.
Adding a company to a license is a risk we won't
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Evan Gates evan.ga...@gmail.com wrote:
In most cases authors of small patches are not added to the LICENSE of
suckless projects.
-emg
Understandable, given the number of contributors of 3-line changes.
I've confirmed the corporate requirement for such a
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 01:22:08PM -0700, Matthew Wesley wrote:
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:00 PM, FRIGN d...@frign.de wrote:
we had this discussion before and the reasons have already been told.
Adding a company to a license is a risk we won't take.
We prefer to deny these patches in favor
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Matthew Wesley wes...@google.com wrote:
Added Google to the LICENSE to the copyright list to meet our legal
requirements.
---
LICENSE | 1 +
st.c| 6 +++---
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/LICENSE b/LICENSE
index
Can you provide some of the history? Nothing in the st commit history
showed a previous Google contribution. If previous patches were able
to get through without a Google entry in LICENSE, I may be able to
take that precedent to our open source team.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Lee Fallat
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Matthew Wesley wes...@google.com wrote:
Can you provide some of the history? Nothing in the st commit history
showed a previous Google contribution. If previous patches were able
to get through without a Google entry in LICENSE, I may be able to
take that
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:00 PM, FRIGN d...@frign.de wrote:
we had this discussion before and the reasons have already been told.
Adding a company to a license is a risk we won't take.
We prefer to deny these patches in favor of staying away from possible
risks of this nature, so please either
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 10:00:45PM +0200, FRIGN wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jun 2015 11:34:26 -0700
Added Google to the LICENSE to the copyright list to meet our legal
requirements.
we had this discussion before and the reasons have already been told.
Adding a company to a license is a risk we won't
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Dimitris Papastamos s...@2f30.org wrote:
Can you not get an exemption from your employer so you can freely contribute
to this project under your own name?
It's possible, but does require more review. Given the trivial nature
of my patch, and the fact that
10 matches
Mail list logo
