Re: [dev] [st] 0.2 is out

2012-02-09 Thread Andrew Hills
The SHELL macro from config.h isn't used; instead, the shell is grabbed with getenv(SHELL). I guess this was the default behavior before, but the last time I used st-0.1.1 I didn't mind having bash as my shell, so I didn't catch it--sorry. The macro should be removed from config.def.h if it's not

Re: [dev] [st] 0.2 is out

2012-02-09 Thread Kurt H Maier
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 09:22:45AM -0500, Andrew Hills wrote: I don't have a choice of setting $SHELL when dwm is launched. Why can't you set $SHELL?

Re: [dev] [st] 0.2 is out

2012-02-09 Thread Andrew Hills
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Kurt H Maier khm-suckl...@intma.in wrote: Why can't you set $SHELL? Stupid restrictions on the environment at work. I telnet into some silly interface to launch a VNC server; all I can specify is the window manager executable's path, and it tests to make sure it's

Re: [dev] [st] 0.2 is out

2012-02-08 Thread ilf
On 02-08 00:14, Aurélien Aptel wrote: As I said previously somewhere on the list, I've tagged the last changeset of the default branch as 0.2. Thanks! Care to update the website? http://st.suckless.org/ And add a post to the News section of http://suckless.org/? Also, please provide a

Re: [dev] [st] 0.2 is out

2012-02-08 Thread Aurélien Aptel
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 2:17 PM, ilf i...@zeromail.org wrote: Care to update the website? http://st.suckless.org/ And add a post to the News section of http://suckless.org/? I did but the wiki has moderation.

Re: [dev] [st] 0.2 is out

2012-02-08 Thread ilf
On 02-08 00:14, Aurélien Aptel wrote: As I said previously somewhere on the list, I've tagged the last changeset of the default branch as 0.2. Checking it out for the first time since 0.1.1. I am running the same tmux session in both rxvt-unicode and st next to each other. The drawing speed

Re: [dev] [st] 0.2 is out

2012-02-08 Thread Benjamin R. Haskell
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012, ilf wrote: On 02-08 00:14, Aurélien Aptel wrote: As I said previously somewhere on the list, I've tagged the last changeset of the default branch as 0.2. Checking it out for the first time since 0.1.1. I am running the same tmux session in both rxvt-unicode and st next

Re: [dev] [st] 0.2 is out

2012-02-08 Thread Aurélien Aptel
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 2:49 PM, ilf i...@zeromail.org wrote: I am running the same tmux session in both rxvt-unicode and st next to each other. The drawing speed of st does indeed feel better than before, but it's still way slower than rxvt in everything I have tried. This is one of the issues

Re: [dev] [st] 0.2 is out

2012-02-08 Thread ilf
On 02-08 09:39, Benjamin R. Haskell wrote: rxvt-unicode uses the wonderful optimization of not really caring whether everything gets displayed. I don't know if every one of those output lines is rendered on screen once. But it doesn't need to, since I can't read it anyways, no matetr if it

Re: [dev] [st] 0.2 is out

2012-02-08 Thread Diego Joss
Hi, there is a minor error on the website in the News section for the announcement: a href=http://st.suckles.org;st 0.2/a I think it should be ;-) a href=http://st.suckless.org;st 0.2/a Have a nice day, -- Diego Joss

Re: [dev] [st] 0.2 is out

2012-02-08 Thread Aurélien Aptel
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Diego Joss diego.j...@hispeed.ch wrote: there is a minor error on the website in the News section for the announcement: Pushed a fix, waiting for moderation, thanks.

Re: [dev] [st] 0.2 is out

2012-02-08 Thread Benjamin R. Haskell
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012, ilf wrote: On 02-08 09:39, Benjamin R. Haskell wrote: rxvt-unicode uses the wonderful optimization of not really caring whether everything gets displayed. I don't know if every one of those output lines is rendered on screen once. But it doesn't need to, since I can't

Re: [dev] [st] 0.2 is out

2012-02-08 Thread ilf
On 02-08 10:25, Benjamin R. Haskell wrote: As Aurélien pointed out, `st` at least behaves similarly (if not identically). Didn't realize what hg rev I was on on that machine. Prior test was w/ 187. With current non-xft tip (rev 228), I get similar results: 0.2s wall time. st-0.2:

Re: [dev] [st] 0.2 is out

2012-02-08 Thread Aurélien Aptel
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 4:41 PM, ilf i...@zeromail.org wrote: Using radeon driver, but this should be irrelevant, right? You're not the first one to have performance problem with it [1], I'm afraid :/ 1: https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Alists.suckless.org+radeon

Re: [dev] [st] 0.2 is out

2012-02-08 Thread Martti Kühne
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 03:47:00PM +0100, Aurélien Aptel wrote: Last, has anyone managed to adjust the transparency patch to this version? http://lists.suckless.org/dev/1009/6046.html https://gist.github.com/1432900 I don't know. But you can be sure it will trigger another troll-fest.

Re: [dev] [st] 0.2 is out

2012-02-08 Thread Anselm R Garbe
On 8 February 2012 14:17, ilf i...@zeromail.org wrote: On 02-08 00:14, Aurélien Aptel wrote: Care to update the website? http://st.suckless.org/ And add a post to the News section of http://suckless.org/? Applied. Also, please provide a Tarball-Link and Checksum in the announce mail.

[dev] [st] 0.2 is out

2012-02-07 Thread Aurélien Aptel
Hi all, As I said previously somewhere on the list, I've tagged the last changeset of the default branch as 0.2.