On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 10:47:46PM +0200, Storkman wrote:
> but more generally,
> the "set of fonts covering as wide variety of code-points as possible"
> ...is just the set of all installed fonts, isn't it?
Not entirely. Let's say a system has 3 fonts installed: A, B and C. A
and B both *only*
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 10:23:44PM +0600, NRK wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 05:36:31PM +0200, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
> > "
> > The font fallback in dwm and dmenu is handled via libsl (i.e drw.c) and
> > it's a huge mess [0].
> >
> > The way it works is also very inefficient (it calls
On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 22:23:44 +0600
NRK wrote:
Dear NRK,
> The "proper" way (IMO) would be to build up a list of fonts which
> would be capable of representing as many code-points available in the
> system *right at startup* - instead of checking each unknown
> code-point as we go.
>
> This way
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 05:36:31PM +0200, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
> "
> The font fallback in dwm and dmenu is handled via libsl (i.e drw.c) and
> it's a huge mess [0].
>
> The way it works is also very inefficient (it calls XftFontMatch() for
> every single "unknown" code-point). The `nomatches`
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 09:11:03PM +0600, NRK wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 04:50:14PM +0200, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
> > Then write a patch to improve it instead of whining about it.
>
> The topic was font fallback; I adviced not to replicate drw, explained
> my reasoning why, and then adviced
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 04:50:14PM +0200, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
> Then write a patch to improve it instead of whining about it.
The topic was font fallback; I adviced not to replicate drw, explained
my reasoning why, and then adviced to look into ST instead.
I don't see any whining.
- NRK
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 08:08:21PM +0600, NRK wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 11:42:33AM +0900, Pontus Stenetorp wrote:
> > My intuition is that it is related to font loading and fall backs, so
> > I am tempted to take a stab at it by comparing the font
> > loading/handling between tabbed, dwm,
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 11:42:33AM +0900, Pontus Stenetorp wrote:
> My intuition is that it is related to font loading and fall backs, so
> I am tempted to take a stab at it by comparing the font
> loading/handling between tabbed, dwm, st, and sent to see if I can
> spot any difference, as the
On Mon 29 Aug 2022, Seb wrote:
>
> I am using xterm under tabbed (v.0.6) and some of the polish
> characters which are in the directory name are not displayed in the
> tabs and the rest of the name is truncated, for instance:
>
> /home/seb/żółty is truncated to /home/seb/żó
>
> when I set the
hi,
I am using xterm under tabbed (v.0.6) and some of the polish characters which are
in the directory name are not displayed in the tabs and the rest of the name is
truncated, for instance:
/home/seb/żółty is truncated to /home/seb/żó
when I set the Xresource :
*XTerm*utf8Title: True
then
10 matches
Mail list logo
