On Fri 15 Apr 2022, Chibby Bromanson wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 02:20:25PM +0200, Wolf wrote:
> > On 2022-04-15 08:51:50 +, Hadrien Lacour wrote:
> > >
> > > Some implementation details: do you really need autohell when the only
> > > thing
> > > you use it for is to detect the
On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 09:37:07AM -0500, Chibby Bromanson wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 08:34:51AM +, Hadrien Lacour wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 09:42:51PM -0500, Chibby Bromanson wrote:
> > > Greetings,
> > >
> > > I am very impressed with the suckless software movement and I am
On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 02:20:25PM +0200, Wolf wrote:
> On 2022-04-15 08:51:50 +, Hadrien Lacour wrote:
> >
> > Some implementation details: do you really need autohell when the only thing
> > you use it for is to detect the presence of sys/xattr.h? That's only a few
> > lines
> > of sh
On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 08:34:51AM +, Hadrien Lacour wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 09:42:51PM -0500, Chibby Bromanson wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > I am very impressed with the suckless software movement and I am doing
> > my best to try to create my own tool that follows the philosophy. I
Hi Dorian,
Took a quick glance into the source and a couple things which stood out,
that haven't been pointed out already:
#define BUFFER_SIZE MAX_TAGS * MAX_TAG_SIZE
Macros like this pretty much always should be parenthesized. It costs
nothing and can save you from getting into
On 22/04/15 02:20, Wolf wrote:>
> Configure script provides lot more then detection though. I have yet to
> see a hand written make providing support for --program-prefix or
> --program-transform-name for example. For packaging software, these
> additional features are useful from time to time.
On 2022-04-15 08:51:50 +, Hadrien Lacour wrote:
>
> Some implementation details: do you really need autohell when the only thing
> you use it for is to detect the presence of sys/xattr.h? That's only a few
> lines
> of sh calling cc to do the same.
> Personally, I use POSIX sh to "augment"
On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 21:42:51 -0500
Chibby Bromanson wrote:
Dear Dorian,
> I am very impressed with the suckless software movement and I am doing
> my best to try to create my own tool that follows the philosophy. I
> still have a lot to learn with the C language but so far I am proud of
> the
On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 09:42:51PM -0500, Chibby Bromanson wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I am very impressed with the suckless software movement and I am doing
> my best to try to create my own tool that follows the philosophy. I
> still have a lot to learn with the C language but so far I am proud of
On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 09:42:51PM -0500, Chibby Bromanson wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I am very impressed with the suckless software movement and I am doing
> my best to try to create my own tool that follows the philosophy. I
> still have a lot to learn with the C language but so far I am proud of
Greetings,
I am very impressed with the suckless software movement and I am doing
my best to try to create my own tool that follows the philosophy. I
still have a lot to learn with the C language but so far I am proud of
the results. I would be greatful if someone would review my tool and
11 matches
Mail list logo
