On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Anselm R Garbe garb...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, done
Thanks, I think this is a good change. Yes, man pages over HTTP are a
little silly, but it does come in handy for studying a tool's
properties using a ubiquitous content viewer (web browser).
rmull
On 10 February 2012 06:09, David Krauser david.krau...@gmail.com wrote:
The links to Man pages are broken for some tools.
For example, http://tools.suckless.org/sic links to
http://man.suckless.org/tools/1/sic which doesn't exist
Links removed. I think users should use man on their local
On 11 February 2012 11:48, hiro 23h...@googlemail.com wrote:
Anselm, consistently you should close the whole web page. Because
nobody needs shitty things like the web.
We only try to suck less, we don't attempt to not suck at all ;)
Thus using the web in a less sucking way than most others is
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 4:58 AM, Anselm R Garbe garb...@gmail.com wrote:
I think users should use man on their local host instead.
Before I was familiar with the software, having the man pages on the
website was very convenient, as the retarded version of man shipped
with RHEL (at work, of
On 11 February 2012 16:41, Andrew Hills hills...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 4:58 AM, Anselm R Garbe garb...@gmail.com wrote:
I think users should use man on their local host instead.
Before I was familiar with the software, having the man pages on the
website was very
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Anselm R Garbe garb...@gmail.com wrote:
In such a world you could run a proper environment using qemu or
virtualbox, right?
Anyhow, if there is more demand for the man pages, I might revise my decision.
Unfortunately, no. But, when man pages were not
On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 10:41:38 -0500
Andrew Hills wrote:
Before I was familiar with the software, having the man pages on the
website was very convenient, as the retarded version of man shipped
with RHEL (at work, of course) wouldn't let me point to an arbitrary
directory of man page files or
On 11 February 2012 17:00, Andrew Hills hills...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Anselm R Garbe garb...@gmail.com wrote:
In such a world you could run a proper environment using qemu or
virtualbox, right?
Anyhow, if there is more demand for the man pages, I might revise my
On 11 February 2012 17:41, Anselm R Garbe garb...@gmail.com wrote:
Except 9base and sbase have different URLs:
http://man.suckless.org/9base/1/
http://man.suckless.org/sbase/1/
Sorry for the noise.
Actually I conclude that the current wman apps for werc sucks big
time. All I really want is, that if there is a *.[1-9] file in the
directory, it will be formatted using troff instead markdown. That's
much simpler and the man pages would appear in the site menu.
I will hack this and get rid of
On 11 February 2012 17:54, Anselm R Garbe garb...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually I conclude that the current wman apps for werc sucks big
time. All I really want is, that if there is a *.[1-9] file in the
directory, it will be formatted using troff instead markdown. That's
much simpler and the man
On 11/02/2012 17:52, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
On 11 February 2012 17:54, Anselm R Garbegarb...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, done, see
http://man.suckless.org
http://man.suckless.org/9base
http://man.suckless.org/sbase
Thanks, I'm running OpenBSD + suckless tools in a virtual machine whilst
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Anselm R Garbe garb...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually I conclude that the current wman apps for werc sucks big
time. All I really want is, that if there is a *.[1-9] file in the
directory, it will be formatted using troff instead markdown. That's
much simpler and
The links to Man pages are broken for some tools.
For example, http://tools.suckless.org/sic links to
http://man.suckless.org/tools/1/sic which doesn't exist
--
David Krauser
14 matches
Mail list logo
