Re: [dev] Whether a css selector applies to given html surf code

2021-11-10 Thread Laslo Hunhold
On Tue, 26 Oct 2021 20:44:52 +0200 Страхиња Радић wrote: Dear Страхиња, > If anyone wants to use other software, by all means they should. > There's nothing wrong with that, but on the other side, that > shouldn't influence suckless programs. I completely agree with that. Popularity should

Re: [dev] Whether a css selector applies to given html surf code

2021-10-27 Thread Sagar Acharya
> Wrong. I'd argue that the "user experience" in most programs that suck is > worse > than the "user experience" using suckless programs. That's one of the reasons > we > call them like that - "programs that suck" and "suckless programs". > > I believe we already discussed this about four

Re: [dev] Whether a css selector applies to given html surf code

2021-10-26 Thread Sagar Acharya
> On 21/10/26 04:48, Sagar Acharya wrote: > >> That's a bit more primitive. It can go a bit more vibrant wrt fonts, colors, >> break points for mobile, tablet which would still be minimal in my view. I'm >> approaching such simplicity from the other complex end which most people >> prefer,

Re: [dev] Whether a css selector applies to given html surf code

2021-10-26 Thread Sagar Acharya
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 07:35:01AM +0200, Sagar Acharya wrote: > >> I assume you mean writing css straight into html file itself. Kamitkami is >> not meant for css that we write. One can use if one uses 1 single style file >> which turns gigantic when used across many html files. >> It's

Re: [dev] Whether a css selector applies to given html surf code

2021-10-26 Thread Страхиња Радић
On 21/10/26 08:32, Sagar Acharya wrote: > People like what they feel. Majority of people out there aren't coders. > Majority of coders just code to earn and would gladly just accept what their > company pushes to them. These people just like convenience. As much as we'd > like them to accept a bit

Re: [dev] Whether a css selector applies to given html surf code

2021-10-26 Thread Страхиња Радић
On 21/10/26 05:22, Nick wrote: > Quoth Страхиња Радић: > > This is what a web page should be: > > > > http://motherfuckingwebsite.com/ > > When I load that in tor browser with js disabled (my default setup > these days), I get a 20741 byte page with the title "Captcha" and no > content except

Re: [dev] Whether a css selector applies to given html surf code

2021-10-26 Thread Страхиња Радић
On 21/10/26 04:48, Sagar Acharya wrote: > That's a bit more primitive. It can go a bit more vibrant wrt fonts, colors, > break points for mobile, tablet which would still be minimal in my view. I'm > approaching such simplicity from the other complex end which most people > prefer, unfortunately.

Re: [dev] Whether a css selector applies to given html surf code

2021-10-26 Thread Nick
Quoth Страхиња Радић: > This is what a web page should be: > > http://motherfuckingwebsite.com/ When I load that in tor browser with js disabled (my default setup these days), I get a 20741 byte page with the title "Captcha" and no content except an eternally rotating image. The web is beyond

Re: [dev] Whether a css selector applies to given html surf code

2021-10-26 Thread Teodoro Santoni
2021-10-25 20:36 GMT+02:00, Sagar Acharya : > Hello, > > I'm making this software called kamitkami. It's a python script which takes > 2 inputs foo.html and bar.css and outputs a css file named bar_foo.css which > contains only the css which applies to the particular html page . This will > make

Re: [dev] Whether a css selector applies to given html surf code

2021-10-26 Thread Страхиња Радић
This is what a web page should be: http://motherfuckingwebsite.com/ This is less minimal, more readable, but still not plagued by "frameworks" and "web coding" (uggh!). This is as far as web should go, ideally: http://bettermotherfuckingwebsite.com/ There is nothing to gain from "minifying"

Re: [dev] Whether a css selector applies to given html surf code

2021-10-26 Thread Sagar Acharya
I assume you mean writing css straight into html file itself. Kamitkami is not meant for css that we write. One can use if one uses 1 single style file which turns gigantic when used across many html files. It's meant for using css frameworks like cirrus. I use cirrus by stanley lim and it's

Re: [dev] Whether a css selector applies to given html surf code

2021-10-26 Thread Hiltjo Posthuma
On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 07:35:01AM +0200, Sagar Acharya wrote: > I assume you mean writing css straight into html file itself. Kamitkami is > not meant for css that we write. One can use if one uses 1 single style file > which turns gigantic when used across many html files. > It's meant for

Re: [dev] Whether a css selector applies to given html surf code

2021-10-25 Thread NRK
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 08:36:31PM +0200, Sagar Acharya wrote: > I'm making this software called kamitkami. It's a python script which takes 2 > inputs foo.html and bar.css and outputs a css file named bar_foo.css which > contains only the css which applies to the particular html page . This

[dev] Whether a css selector applies to given html surf code

2021-10-25 Thread Sagar Acharya
Hello, I'm making this software called kamitkami. It's a python script which takes 2 inputs foo.html and bar.css and outputs a css file named bar_foo.css which contains only the css which applies to the particular html page . This will make css extremely minimal and page loading faster. This