On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 06:01:08PM -0300, Amadeus Folego wrote:
Hadrian,
please do not tell that you represent everyone, you don't. Also what you
just said is like your opinion, man.
Indeed.
As I was asked off-list, please, keep this thread shut down.
Thank you.
Hello,
Sylvain wrote:
As I was asked off-list, please, keep this thread shut down.
I think these are appropriate:
http://38.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m51pu9IEYc1qzm5y8o14_r1_250.gif
http://38.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m51pu9IEYc1qzm5y8o1_250.gif
yours,
Bobby
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Sylvain BERTRAND sylw...@legeek.net wrote:
I heard about GNU GPL version wars, was only aware of the benign
Linus T. one.
Let me laught:
Do you really think a GNU GPL version war can reasonnably
compensate the defect of code closing from MIT/BSD-like
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:35:39PM -0600, Anthony J. Bentley wrote:
Sylvain BERTRAND writes:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 09:32:33PM -0600, Anthony J. Bentley wrote:
Sylvain BERTRAND writes:
I firmely disagree with you on this: the event of somebody hurt
by the GNU GPL with real life facts
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 05:57:13PM +0900, Philip Rushik wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Sylvain BERTRAND sylw...@legeek.net wrote:
I heard about GNU GPL version wars, was only aware of the benign
Linus T. one.
Let me laught:
Do you really think a GNU GPL version war can
Hi Sylvain!
You must be new here. People on this list mainly lurk watching progress
of suckless software. There are two kinds of threads here:
1. Patches and development of suckless software - strictly technical.
2. The rest - recommendations/questions for/about suckless
Hadrian,
please do not tell that you represent everyone, you don't. Also what you
just said is like your opinion, man.
This is a reboot of the previous thread that was hi-jacked by a
derived topic ;)
Let's stay focused on the pertinent topic of
the thread, without the damage of what we wrongly did on the
thread related to the suckless distro,
thank you for your understanding.
On 25 June 2014 14:28, Sylvain BERTRAND sylw...@legeek.net wrote:
This is a reboot of the previous thread that was hi-jacked by a
derived topic ;)
Let's stay focused on the pertinent topic of
the thread, without the damage of what we wrongly did on the
thread related to the suckless distro,
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 02:30:48PM -0400, Calvin Morrison wrote:
stop repeating yourself. You don't need a new subject and a duplicate
post to garner a response. what a waste of space
Please, keep this thread for frign to expose *explicitely* what
went wrong with the GNU GPL licenses and
Sylvain,
You've had positive contributions here before. Please have consideration
for the many subscribers who are here to participate in discussion
related to suckless.org and suckless philosophy, and have no interest in
meaningless mud slinging between two people.
There is a good way to
We are still waiting...
Who is that we you're speaking of.
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 02:59:09AM +0800, Chris Down wrote:
Sylvain,
You've had positive contributions here before. Please have consideration
for the many subscribers who are here to participate in discussion
related to suckless.org and suckless philosophy, and have no interest in
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Sylvain BERTRAND sylw...@legeek.net wrote:
I'm very disappointed: I was the guy who was attacked on his
published work on internet (in a rather clumsy and harsh way).
It's the internet, people say stuff, don't let it get to you.
Nethertheless, when I'm about
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 09:07:26AM +0900, Philip Rushik wrote:
It's the internet, people say stuff, don't let it get to you.
It did not get to me (I'm an internet children, I'm used to
trolls).
On those later threads, I stayed polite and analytical all the
time except, of course, regarding
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Sylvain BERTRAND sylw...@legeek.net wrote:
It did not get to me (I'm an internet children, I'm used to
trolls).
On those later threads, I stayed polite and analytical all the
time except, of course, regarding closed source system software
manufacturers. Could
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 11:11:38AM +0900, Philip Rushik wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Sylvain BERTRAND sylw...@legeek.net wrote:
It did not get to me (I'm an internet children, I'm used to
trolls).
On those later threads, I stayed polite and analytical all the
time except, of
Sylvain BERTRAND writes:
I firmely disagree with you on this: the event of somebody hurt
by the GNU GPL with real life facts is of highest importance for
all open source coders. And communication would have been
an enrichment for the suckless community.
The thread will die because I think
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 09:32:33PM -0600, Anthony J. Bentley wrote:
Sylvain BERTRAND writes:
I firmely disagree with you on this: the event of somebody hurt
by the GNU GPL with real life facts is of highest importance for
all open source coders. And communication would have been
an enrichment
Sylvain BERTRAND writes:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 09:32:33PM -0600, Anthony J. Bentley wrote:
Sylvain BERTRAND writes:
I firmely disagree with you on this: the event of somebody hurt
by the GNU GPL with real life facts is of highest importance for
all open source coders. And communication
20 matches
Mail list logo
