On 23/01/16 12:33, Страхиња Радић wrote:
> Most of what's to be said in "defense" of st and other suckless software is
> already out there on suckless.org, including the sorry state of XTerm being
> the
> driving idea behind writing st, which the OP turned upside-down, so that's
> one
> more
On 23/01/14 09:25, Markus Wichmann wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 07:53:41PM -0600, Dave Blanchard wrote:
> > I experimented with st for a week or so, before finally realizing that
> > it's poorly-written trash. It has no advantages over XTerm at all.
> >
>
> So where's the patch?
>
> Given
On Fri, 13 Jan 2023 19:53:41 -0600
Dave Blanchard wrote:
> I experimented with st for a week or so, before finally realizing that
> it's poorly-written trash. It has no advantages over XTerm at all.
Why do you think it's "poorly written"? I looked at the code when I
wanted to add a feature. I
On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 07:53:41PM -0600, Dave Blanchard wrote:
> I experimented with st for a week or so, before finally realizing that
> it's poorly-written trash. It has no advantages over XTerm at all.
>
So where's the patch?
Given that a terminal emulator is a necessary part of the Trusted
On Sun, 08 Jan 2023 04:32:20 -0500
"Greg Reagle" wrote:
> I wrote this little wrapper script I call ost:
>
> <<<
> #!/bin/sh
> export ST_LOG_FILE=$(mktemp) || { printf '%s\n' "$0: cannot create temp file"
> >&2 ; exit 1; }
> st -o "$ST_LOG_FILE" "$@"
> rm "$ST_LOG_FILE"
> >>>
>
> If some
I wrote this little wrapper script I call ost:
<<<
#!/bin/sh
export ST_LOG_FILE=$(mktemp) || { printf '%s\n' "$0: cannot create temp file"
>&2 ; exit 1; }
st -o "$ST_LOG_FILE" "$@"
rm "$ST_LOG_FILE"
>>>
If some output scrolls past that I want to go back and see, I look at its
"$ST_LOG_FILE" in
