Re: [stali] scope (was: Re: [dev] neatroff)

On 11 August 2016 at 11:21, FRIGN wrote: [..] > I am sure suckless.org has a lot of street-cred in the OSS-scene. We > could use this leverage to have a positive influence on a big > distribution people actually use. In the long term, making OpenBSD > better will benefit those who

[stali] scope (was: Re: [dev] neatroff)

On Thu, 11 Aug 2016 11:03:13 +0200 Anselm R Garbe wrote: Hey Anselm, > I have no problem with OpenBSD per se, but I do think that its scope > is general (server) purpose and that the hardware support in the > embedded non-network space doesn't sound too great to me. linux