Could you describe to us what *exactly* did happen to you?
see [0]
[0] http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/i-took-an-arrow-in-the-knee
On 25 June 2014 12:49, Calvin Morrison mutanttur...@gmail.com wrote:
Could you describe to us what *exactly* did happen to you?
see [0]
[0] http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/i-took-an-arrow-in-the-knee
But more seriously, GNU freedom is the same kind of 'freedom' that is
promised by communists.
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:52:33PM -0400, Calvin Morrison wrote:
On 25 June 2014 12:49, Calvin Morrison mutanttur...@gmail.com wrote:
Could you describe to us what *exactly* did happen to you?
see [0]
[0] http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/i-took-an-arrow-in-the-knee
But more seriously, GNU
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:52:33PM -0400, Calvin Morrison wrote:
On 25 June 2014 12:49, Calvin Morrison mutanttur...@gmail.com wrote:
Could you describe to us what *exactly* did happen to you?
see [0]
[0] http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/i-took-an-arrow-in-the-knee
But more seriously,
If you craft your words enough, and trick people enough, then they
will believe it is free, while being coerced into helping the 'greater
good'
The 'greater good' isn't a good but a bad thing in your opinion?
It's a great thing in my opinion, but coercion isn't really a good way
to achieve
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 01:52:14PM -0400, Calvin Morrison wrote:
If you craft your words enough, and trick people enough, then they
will believe it is free, while being coerced into helping the 'greater
good'
The 'greater good' isn't a good but a bad thing in your opinion?
It's a
The GPL inforces that the codebase stays free.
No, all free licenses enforce a continually free codebase. If I
release under MIT or BSD, that code that I release will always be free
and there's nothing anybody else can do about it.
GPL tries to control what other people do with code they wrote.
Granted, GPL did a lot of good, it created a free software culture and
made Linux what it is. Ubuntu has also done a lot of good by getting
people started in Linux, but that doesn't make it suckless.
You have cause and effect written incorrectly. Free software existed
first, then licenses were
You have cause and effect written incorrectly. Free software existed
first, then licenses were created afterward to protect them.
Ok, well then in popularized or spread free software. My point was
just that has done good doesn't justify its continued use, and
doesn't make it suckless. That's
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 03:21:01AM +0900, Philip Rushik wrote:
The GPL inforces that the codebase stays free.
No, all free licenses enforce a continually free codebase. If I
release under MIT or BSD, that code that I release will always be free
and there's nothing anybody else can do about
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 04:07:14AM +0900, Philip Rushik wrote:
You have cause and effect written incorrectly. Free software existed
first, then licenses were created afterward to protect them.
Ok, well then in popularized or spread free software. My point was
just that has done good
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 5:30 AM, Kurt Van Dijck
dev.k...@vandijck-laurijssen.be wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 03:21:01AM +0900, Philip Rushik wrote:
The GPL inforces that the codebase stays free.
No, all free licenses enforce a continually free codebase. If I
release under MIT or BSD, that
On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 12:52:33 -0400
Calvin Morrison mutanttur...@gmail.com wrote:
Free should mean anyone can take my code and do what they please with
it. Somewhat free is usually like, they can do whatever they want, but
leave my name on it. GNU Free is, sure you can use it, but you need to
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 06:33:17AM +0900, Philip Rushik wrote:
Nobody can take your code and make it non-free under a MIT/BSD license,
they can only make their modifications non-free.
I am confused. The BSD 3-Clause License[0] states the following:
Redistribution and use in source and binary
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:30:28PM +0200, Kurt Van Dijck wrote:
In my understanding, GPL enforces that derived work of your code
will still be free to its users. This covers 2 major aspects:
* One cannot repackage or modify GPL software and make it non-free
I think that is a guarantee that
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 8:02 AM, Dimitris Papastamos s...@2f30.org wrote:
I am confused. The BSD 3-Clause License[0] states the following:
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 08:24:23AM +0900, Philip Rushik wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 8:02 AM, Dimitris Papastamos s...@2f30.org wrote:
I am confused. The BSD 3-Clause License[0] states the following:
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
modification, are
17 matches
Mail list logo
