Hi,
I was away from computer but today I saw suckless repo on Github.
This is an official repo as http://hg.suckless.org , maintened by devs or
this is something added by volunteers?
Cheers.
--
Envoyé d'Archlinux
Use awk.
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 6:07 AM, Strake strake...@gmail.com wrote:
Will now need libutf.
diff -r 8cf300476909 Makefile
--- a/Makefile Sat Jun 09 18:53:39 2012 +0100
+++ b/Makefile Tue Jul 31 23:06:28 2012 -0500
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
cksum.c\
cmp.c \
I really don't care, luser space, or kernel space, as long as ALSA and
Puke Audio die.
Uriel
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Anthony J. Bentley anth...@cathet.us wrote:
Christoph Lohmann writes:
Greetings comrades,
in our reckless effort to improve the software world a new friend might
Thanks Marc!
To all -- This version is very stable and very functional. It is a huge
productivity enhancer for anyone who works in a terminal!
-Ross
On 08/01/2012 07:49 AM, Marc Andre Tanner wrote:
Hi,
I've released dvtm-0.8
http://www.brain-dump.org/projects/dvtm/dvtm-0.8.tar.gz
Greetings.
On Wed, 01 Aug 2012 14:48:47 +0200 Marc Andre Tanner m...@brain-dump.org
wrote:
Hi,
I've released dvtm-0.8
http://www.brain-dump.org/projects/dvtm/dvtm-0.8.tar.gz
Changes since last release
* AIX support (special thanks to Ross Mohn)
[snip]
How is this possible
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Prakhar Goel newt0...@gmail.com wrote:
I propose adding redo to the list of software that rocks. It'll also
give you a nice incremental build system to use.
I like the design, but unless you rewrite it in C or Go it is not
worth taking seriously.
Uriel
Info
On 08/01/2012 02:36 PM, Uriel wrote:
Use awk.
Use Perl.
Why would you use awk or Perl when you have the best programming language
available: Ruby?
On Aug 1, 2012 8:55 AM, Martin Kopta mar...@kopta.eu wrote:
On 08/01/2012 02:36 PM, Uriel wrote:
Use awk.
Use Perl.
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 08:58:00AM -0400, Niki Yoshiuchi wrote:
Why would you use awk or Perl when you have the best programming language
available: Ruby?
On Aug 1, 2012 8:55 AM, Martin Kopta mar...@kopta.eu wrote:
On 08/01/2012 02:36 PM, Uriel wrote:
Use awk.
Use Perl.
I
Couldn't quite work out how to scroll back in the buffer. To add
scrollbackabilty to st.
http://natalian.org/archives/2012/07/31/dwm+tmux/
I'm thinking dvtm could replace tmux. I'm probably way off the mark.
Greetings.
On Wed, 01 Aug 2012 15:10:19 +0200 Niki Yoshiuchi aplu...@gmail.com wrote:
Why would you use awk or Perl when you have the best programming language
available: Ruby?
On Aug 1, 2012 8:55 AM, Martin Kopta mar...@kopta.eu wrote:
On 08/01/2012 02:36 PM, Uriel wrote:
Use awk.
On 08/01/2012 08:48 AM, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
Greetings.
On Wed, 01 Aug 2012 14:48:47 +0200 Marc Andre Tanner m...@brain-dump.org
wrote:
Hi,
I've released dvtm-0.8
http://www.brain-dump.org/projects/dvtm/dvtm-0.8.tar.gz
Changes since last release
* AIX support (special thanks to
On 08/01/2012 09:12 AM, Kai Hendry wrote:
Couldn't quite work out how to scroll back in the buffer. To add
scrollbackabilty to st.
Try CTRL-g + PgUp
http://natalian.org/archives/2012/07/31/dwm+tmux/
I'm thinking dvtm could replace tmux. I'm probably way off the mark.
You're not at all off
On 08/01/2012 03:09 PM, Kurt H Maier wrote:
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 08:58:00AM -0400, Niki Yoshiuchi wrote:
Why would you use awk or Perl when you have the best programming language
available: Ruby?
On Aug 1, 2012 8:55 AM, Martin Kopta mar...@kopta.eu wrote:
On 08/01/2012 02:36 PM, Uriel
On 01/08/2012, Martin Kopta mar...@kopta.eu wrote:
Also, I'm really curious why people use cut when awk exists.
$ du -b /usr/bin/cut /usr/bin/gawk /opt/plan9/bin/awk
38600 /usr/bin/cut
400212 /usr/bin/gawk
105700 /opt/plan9/bin/awk
Speed and simplicity I guess?
Why would I use awk of
On Aug 1, 2012 8:17 AM, Marc Andre Tanner m...@brain-dump.org wrote:
Hi,
I've released dvtm-0.8
http://www.brain-dump.org/projects/dvtm/dvtm-0.8.tar.gz
Changes since last release
* AIX support (special thanks to Ross Mohn)
* Cygwin compile fix
* terminal emulation correctness
I rewrote cut cleaner, but am not sure whether I ought to bother to
send it, if ye would rather keep sbase sans cut.
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 6:18 AM, Ross Mohn rpm...@waxandwane.org wrote:
http://natalian.org/archives/2012/07/31/dwm+tmux/
I'm thinking dvtm could replace tmux. I'm probably way off the mark.
You're not at all off the mark; you should replace tmux with dvtm. Tmux is a
decent multiplexer, but
HI,
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Strake strake...@gmail.com wrote:
I rewrote cut cleaner, but am not sure whether I ought to bother to
send it, if ye would rather keep sbase sans cut.
IMO cut is a good tool to include. I use cut's functionality much more
than awk's; it's a simpler tool that
Sorry, sent this message with the wrong From: address
On 1 August 2012 16:10, Kai Hendry hen...@webconverger.com wrote:
On 1 August 2012 15:18, Ross Mohn rpm...@waxandwane.org wrote:
Try CTRL-g + PgUp
I realise this could probably be rebound, but the default is pretty
unusable. IIUC I need
Quoth Ryan Mullen:
Exclusion of cut would make sbase not viable when existing scripts
need to be supported.
Exactly. I only use awk to do these kind of jobs nowadays, but cut
is in use a lot of places, so it makes sense to use it. And it can
be easier for certain kinds of jobs (e.g. printing
The only thing i miss in cut is mutichar word split. Which is properly handled
by awk. For example:
If a line is splitted by multiple spaces or a mix of tabs and spaces it is not
handled right by cut. But awk does the job.
That's quite anoying because of the crappy output of many tools that
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 10:23 AM, pancake panc...@youterm.com wrote:
The only thing i miss in cut is mutichar word split. Which is properly
handled by awk. For example:
If a line is splitted by multiple spaces or a mix of tabs and spaces it is
not handled right by cut. But awk does the
Anyone checked my cake?
http://hg.youterm.com/cake
On Aug 1, 2012, at 14:52, Uriel ur...@berlinblue.org wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Prakhar Goel newt0...@gmail.com wrote:
I propose adding redo to the list of software that rocks. It'll also
give you a nice incremental build system
On 08/01/2012 10:01 AM, Chris Larson wrote:
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 6:18 AM, Ross Mohn rpm...@waxandwane.org wrote:
http://natalian.org/archives/2012/07/31/dwm+tmux/
I'm thinking dvtm could replace tmux. I'm probably way off the mark.
You're not at all off the mark; you should replace tmux
diff -r 8cf300476909 chroot.8
--- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +
+++ b/chroot.8 Wed Aug 01 04:46:43 2012 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+.TH CHROOT 8
+.SH NAME
+chroot \- change root directory
+.SH SYNOPSIS
+.B chroot
+.I path
+[
+.I x
+[
+.I argument ...
+]
+]
+.SH OPERATION
+.B chroot
That is vulnerable on linux. Proper use is:
chdir (path); chroot(.);
On Aug 1, 2012, at 16:50, Strake strake...@gmail.com wrote:
diff -r 8cf300476909 chroot.8
--- /dev/nullThu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +
+++ b/chroot.8Wed Aug 01 04:46:43 2012 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+.TH CHROOT 8
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Ross Mohn rpm...@waxandwane.org wrote:
You're not at all off the mark; you should replace tmux with dvtm. Tmux
is a
decent multiplexer, but dvtm it a true terminal manager!
How exactly is tmux not a true terminal manager, out of curiosity?
I'm quite intrigued
You could have at least tried to match the formatting of the rest of the
project.
On 01/08/2012, pancake panc...@youterm.com wrote:
That is vulnerable on linux. Proper use is:
chdir (path); chroot(.);
Ah, sorry.
--- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +
+++ b/chroot.8 Wed Aug 01 05:09:36 2012 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+.TH CHROOT 8
+.SH NAME
+chroot \- change root
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 04:11:16PM +0200, Kai Hendry wrote:
What would be good if just PGUP/PGDN worked.
The following should work, but as the code is you have no way of sending
PGUP/PGDN to the underlying app, which might be a problem. I personally
use a pager when I know that I want to
On 1 August 2012 16:48, pancake panc...@youterm.com wrote:
Anyone checked my cake?
http://hg.youterm.com/cake
What's your take on tup?
http://gittup.org/building-firefox-with-tup.html
Thanks for the information. Actually I think it was a good idea to add
suckless in Github.
Take care.
--
Envoyé d'Archlinux
why argu?
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Strake strake...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
+void main (int argc, char *argu[]) {
[...]
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Ryan Mullen rmmul...@gmail.com wrote:
Exclusion of cut would make sbase not viable when existing scripts
need to be supported.
Exclusion of bash would make sbase not viable when existing scripts
need to be supported.
What a lame argument.
Uriel
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Martin Kopta mar...@kopta.eu wrote:
On 08/01/2012 03:09 PM, Kurt H Maier wrote:
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 08:58:00AM -0400, Niki Yoshiuchi wrote:
Why would you use awk or Perl when you have the best programming language
available: Ruby?
On Aug 1, 2012 8:55 AM,
Quoth Uriel:
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Ryan Mullen rmmul...@gmail.com wrote:
Exclusion of cut would make sbase not viable when existing scripts
need to be supported.
Exclusion of bash would make sbase not viable when existing scripts
need to be supported.
What a lame argument.
Tup is cool but i find it quite bloated to depend on sqlite. And requires to
rebuild the cache for every new file.
Apart from that the rules looks good and graph theory makes the papers cool.
I had some issues trying to port r2 from makefiles to tupfiles so i end up
keeping the good old
because suckless lol
On 8/2/12, Kurt H Maier khm-suckl...@intma.in wrote:
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 11:02:52PM +0100, Nick wrote:
Bah. There's a balance to be struck. Scripts which aren't awful
should be supported. The issue is whether using cut constitutes
'awful'. I think it does not. There
On 18:54 Wed 01 Aug, Kurt H Maier wrote:
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 11:02:52PM +0100, Nick wrote:
Bah. There's a balance to be struck. Scripts which aren't awful
should be supported. The issue is whether using cut constitutes
'awful'. I think it does not. There are legitimate cases where it's
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 07:13:57PM -0400, Steven Blatchford wrote:
Give this[0] a read and see what you think.
[0] http://awk.freeshell.org/RangeOfFields
I think their suggestions are based on
1) deciding to use a shitty version of awk, and
2) the idea that you should give a shit if
On 19:21 Wed 01 Aug, Kurt H Maier wrote:
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 07:13:57PM -0400, Steven Blatchford wrote:
Give this[0] a read and see what you think.
[0] http://awk.freeshell.org/RangeOfFields
I think their suggestions are based on
1) deciding to use a shitty version of awk, and
2)
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 07:28:57PM -0400, Steven Blatchford wrote:
What is your awk to print fields three and four with this input:
'foo bar baz quz'
Depends on what output format I want. Get to the point instead of
trying to set me up for failure; I don't have time for this shit
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Kurt H Maier khm-suckl...@intma.in wrote:
The question is: since cut can be implemented IN awk, why should it get
a separate C binary? Anyone nattering about performance in a shell
script is barking up the wrong tree.
Should sed be excluded? What can you do
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 08:33:14PM -0400, Andrew Hills wrote:
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Kurt H Maier khm-suckl...@intma.in wrote:
The question is: since cut can be implemented IN awk, why should it get
a separate C binary? Anyone nattering about performance in a shell
script is
On 01/08/2012, Kurt H Maier khm-suckl...@intma.in wrote:
In fact, I'm fairly
certain I could implement cut in sed.
with shell script wrapper?
On 19:52 Wed 01 Aug, Kurt H Maier wrote:
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 07:28:57PM -0400, Steven Blatchford wrote:
What is your awk to print fields three and four with this input:
'foo bar baz quz'
Depends on what output format I want. Get to the point instead of
trying to set me up for
On 19:52 Wed 01 Aug, Kurt H Maier wrote:
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 07:28:57PM -0400, Steven Blatchford wrote:
What is your awk to print fields three and four with this input:
'foo bar baz quz'
Depends on what output format I want. Get to the point instead of
trying to set me up for
On 00:12 Thu 02 Aug, sjferr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19:52 Wed 01 Aug, Kurt H Maier wrote:
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 07:28:57PM -0400, Steven Blatchford wrote:
What is your awk to print fields three and four with this input:
'foo bar baz quz'
Depends on what output format I want. Get to
49 matches
Mail list logo
