Hi again,
I did refresh my knowledge on unicode/font stuff, and yes, st will be screwed:
An unicode string has 4 canonical normalizations. But only one (NFD) seems to
be futur proof regarding what features will be supported by font files
(opentype(microsoft tm)/open font format).
Ofc, this is
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 10:26:52PM +0600, Eon S. Jeon wrote:
> I think fontconfig is to blame here. It?s what st is using to find fallbacks.
> It?s just that we don?t want such highly sophisticated fallback mechanism. We
> all love simple infallible code, so that we can always blame users. ;)
>
On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 11:21:27 +0200
Dimitrios Semitsoglou-Tsiapos wrote:
> Hello everyone,
Hello Dimitrios,
> I have been hunting a bug where zathura windows do not get rendered
> inside tabbed. It seems that the issue boils down to both Gtk+ and tabbed.
And X11 embedding alltogether, I think.
On 25/09/18 11:38, Quentin Rameau wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 11:21:27 +0200
> Dimitrios Semitsoglou-Tsiapos wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone,
>
> Hello Dimitrios,
>
>> I have been hunting a bug where zathura windows do not get rendered
>> inside tabbed. It seems that the issue boils down to both
Hello everyone,
I have been hunting a bug where zathura windows do not get rendered
inside tabbed. It seems that the issue boils down to both Gtk+ and tabbed.
To avoid repeating too much content here, you can see the list of bugs I
have opened so far linked here [1]. Most relevant to you should
> On 25 Sep 2018, at 14:10, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 10:26:52PM +0600, Eon S. Jeon wrote:
>> I think fontconfig is to blame here. It?s what st is using to find
>> fallbacks. It?s just that we don?t want such highly sophisticated fallback
>> mechanism. We
On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 21:25:12 +
sylvain.bertr...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Sylvain,
> An unicode string has 4 canonical normalizations. But only one (NFD)
> seems to be futur proof regarding what features will be supported by
> font files (opentype(microsoft tm)/open font format).
this is true,
On 25 September 2018 at 16:32, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 16:28:22 -0700
> AR Garbe wrote:
>> This is something I was considering, however it looks like the water
>> of the babie's bathtub is poisoned with freetype2/fc bacteria. I don't
>> wanna introduce abstractions that might
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 04:28:22PM -0700, AR Garbe wrote:
> This is something I was considering, however it looks like the water
> of the babie's bathtub is poisoned with freetype2/fc bacteria. I don't
> wanna introduce abstractions that might be premature, hence I suggest
> to fully revert back
Hi Silvain,
On 25 September 2018 at 14:25, wrote:
> The suckless futur proof solution: it is over, st goes 7bits ascii only with
> it's own bitmap fonts... non english-only terminal users will just trash it.
Sounds like a better plan for longevity.
> ... or a suckless futur proof unicode/font
Hi Laslo,
On 25 September 2018 at 16:06, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 21:25:12 +
> sylvain.bertr...@gmail.com wrote:
>struct sfl { ... };
>
>sfl_init(struct sfl *s, char **files, size_t nfiles);
>sfl_draw(...);
>sfl_free(struct sfl *s);
This is something I was
On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 16:28:22 -0700
AR Garbe wrote:
Dear Anselm,
> This is something I was considering, however it looks like the water
> of the babie's bathtub is poisoned with freetype2/fc bacteria. I don't
> wanna introduce abstractions that might be premature, hence I suggest
> to fully
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 01:06:52AM +0200, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 21:25:12 +
> sylvain.bertr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > - a full xml smile/svg vector renderer (like librsvg/expat for
> > the svg part)
>
> No, forget about SVG fonts. Nobody sane would think about
> On 25 Sep 2018, at 00:12, Manu Raster wrote:
>
> "Eon S. Jeon" writes:
>
Hiltjo Posthuma writes:
>
I agree its useful. (Complex) fall-back font support has been on my mind
also.
An idea could be of instead of supporting fallback fonts we could write
some
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 08:17:51PM +0600, Eon S. Jeon wrote:
> I use all of CJK and am not the only one who use non-Latin language in
> terminal. In the past, I too assumed I would use only English on terminal,
> but I cannot control what other people send to me. It is really stupid if I
> have to
15 matches
Mail list logo
