Hi
On 10/06/2011, at 4:26, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> On 9 June 2011 23:24, pancake wrote:
>> support for string mode format in chmod. Now you can do stuff like chmod +x
>> .. g-rwx , ...
>
> Thanks, I'll get round to looking at this tomorrow.
>
>> fix uninitialized bug in tail
>
> No, ther
On 9 June 2011 23:25, pancake wrote:
> What do you think about creating a single main() in sbase.c that works like
> busybox (as a proxy for the rest of binaries) i think this can be interesting
> for embeddeds. So reading symlink of argv0 and act accordingly.
The only way this is going to happ
On 9 June 2011 23:24, pancake wrote:
> support for string mode format in chmod. Now you can do stuff like chmod +x
> .. g-rwx , ...
Thanks, I'll get round to looking at this tomorrow.
> fix uninitialized bug in tail
No, there's no bug here; size is allocated and memset on the next line.
> sim
On 10 June 2011 02:32, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> Thanks. I actually decided the name system is better, since only that
> is required by POSIX
Though we can allow signums for '-s', despite its not being strictly POSIX.
cls
On 9 June 2011 16:28, Rob wrote:
> I was wondering whether to do that or not, it's pretty useful but
> there's a fair bit more code. I'll leave it to cls to decide.
Thanks. I actually decided the name system is better, since only that
is required by POSIX, and it means we can use the same arg par
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> On 9 June 2011 13:40, stateless wrote:
>> Attached cmp.c and cmp.1.
>
> Thanks! I'm also not bothering with '-', so I took that out, which
> meant we could simplify the code a lot.
Don’t we have /dev/stdin for that anyway?
--
Anthony J.
On 9 June 2011 13:40, stateless wrote:
> Attached cmp.c and cmp.1.
Thanks! I'm also not bothering with '-', so I took that out, which
meant we could simplify the code a lot.
cls
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 6:25 PM, pancake wrote:
> What do you think about creating a single main() in sbase.c that works like
> busybox (as a proxy for the rest of binaries) i think this can be interesting
> for embeddeds. So reading symlink of argv0 and act accordingly.
please for the love of g
I like his rationale. pre-aliasing and neuro-aliasing come to mind,
but idiotic as it might sound the only technically clear term is
really "not antialiased".
I guess I (we?) should get a life :D
What do you think about creating a single main() in sbase.c that works like
busybox (as a proxy for the rest of binaries) i think this can be interesting
for embeddeds. So reading symlink of argv0 and act accordingly.
On 09/06/2011, at 17:28, Rob wrote:
> On 9 June 2011 16:06, Hiltjo Posthuma
Here's my contribution:
* support for string mode format in chmod. Now you can do stuff like chmod +x
.. g-rwx , ...
* fix uninitialized bug in tail
* simplify sleep() -- do not use getopt here.
The chmod patch is not complete at all, but works much better and +x is
something many ppl use.
Abo
Hey all,
I'd like to include those of you who aren't in IRC in the discussion
we're having wrt writing a new text editor. We do already have Sandy
of course, and I think Rafa is doing a great job, but there are a
couple of reasons why I don't think it will for me replace Vi:
1. Curses: it has it
On Thu 09 Jun 2011 02:50:53 PM PDT, hiro wrote:
> The Tamsyn guy says it's an "aliased font". What does it mean?
Here's a reply from the author of Tamsyn regarding this matter:
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 14:04:43 -0700
From: Scott Fial
To: "Suraj N. Kurapati"
Subject: Re:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 15:00, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote:
> I'm not sure "aliased" is quite an appropriate word for a font since it's the
> display which does the aliasing by virtue of its pixellated nature.
I think neither would be appropriate because in the artistic task of
creating the font ea
Ok I fixed it in tip.
When st has its own window, focus change is notified with the
FocusIn/FocusOut event. Now when st is embed, it just receives
EnterNotify/LeaveNotify event.
On 9 June 2011 16:06, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
> I like it, but what about -signalnumber (and maybe -signalname), I use
> -9 all the time :)
I was wondering whether to do that or not, it's pretty useful but
there's a fair bit more code. I'll leave it to cls to decide.
#include
#include
#include
>
> Ah man, I've just been doing kill.c myself. Lowest SLOC count makes it
> into base?
>
I like it, but what about -signalnumber (and maybe -signalname), I use
-9 all the time :)
> The Tamsyn guy says it's an "aliased font". What does it mean?
He means it's not anti-aliased. See also
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aliasing
--
Eckehard Berns
On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 12:37:32 +0200
Bert Münnich wrote:
> I'm not sure about the "exporting" thing. If there's one thing I've
> learned from writing url-select [1], it's that a lot of URLs get line
> wrapped inside curses-based applications (e.g. mcabber, irssi, weechat,
> vim, newsbeuter, mutt)
No worries Rob! :)
On 9 June 2011 13:54, stateless wrote:
> Arrgh fucking gmail.
+1
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include "util.h"
int
main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
int sig = SIGTERM;
char c, *end;
while((c = getopt(argc, argv, "s:")) != -1)
switch(c){
case 's':
sig = strtol(optarg, &end, 0)
On 9 June 2011 13:48, stateless wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just to be on the same page and we don't start working on the same
> tools. I'll look into implementing id, kill and comm.
>
> Thanks,
> stateless
Ah man, I've just been doing kill.c myself. Lowest SLOC count makes it
into base?
#include
#include
On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 13:55:30 +0100
Ethan Grammatikidis wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 14:50:53 +0200
> hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > The Tamsyn guy says it's an "aliased font". What does it mean?
>
> It's not, but it has some overlap in places which makes it look smoother.
My bad, I th
On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 14:50:53 +0200
hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> The Tamsyn guy says it's an "aliased font". What does it mean?
It's not, but it has some overlap in places which makes it look smoother.
Arrgh fucking gmail.
/* See LICENSE file for copyright and license details. */
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include "util.h"
static bool lflag = false;
static bool sflag = false;
int
main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
FILE *fp0, *fp1;
int c;
int line, byte;
int ch0, ch1;
in
On 9 June 2011 13:50, hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> The Tamsyn guy says it's an "aliased font". What does it mean?
It means it isn't anti-aliased.
Nice font, btw.
cls
Small update, attached cmd.c and cmd.1.
/* See LICENSE file for copyright and license details. */
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include "util.h"
static bool lflag = false;
static bool sflag = false;
int
main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
FILE *fp0, *fp1;
int c;
int line, byte;
The Tamsyn guy says it's an "aliased font". What does it mean?
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:00, ilf wrote:
> On 06-09 09:04, Petr Sabata wrote:
>>
>> How about bgs? http://s01.de/~tox/index.cgi/proj_bgs
>
> Been using that for a while. Doesn't do it for me with rxvt-unicode 9.09 any
> more, because
Hi,
Just to be on the same page and we don't start working on the same
tools. I'll look into implementing id, kill and comm.
Thanks,
stateless
Attached cmp.c and cmp.1.
/* See LICENSE file for copyright and license details. */
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include "util.h"
static bool lflag = false;
static bool sflag = false;
int
main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
FILE *fp0, *fp1;
int c;
int line, byte;
int ch0, ch1
Applied, thanks.
On 08.06.11, Aurélien Aptel wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Bert Münnich wrote:
> > I would also like to look into the scrollback buffer goal. How do
> > you
> > want to achieve an unlimited scrollback buffer? Writing every line to a
> > file and printing its content instead of the curre
On 06-09 09:04, Petr Sabata wrote:
How about bgs?
http://s01.de/~tox/index.cgi/proj_bgs
Been using that for a while. Doesn't do it for me with rxvt-unicode
9.09 any more, because it doesn't set XROOTPMAP on the root window. Too
busy to fix.
--
ilf
Über 80 Millionen Deutsche benutzen keine
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 10:12:26PM +0200, Mate Nagy wrote:
> Hi,
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 08:40:48PM +0200, ilf wrote:
> > On 06-08 12:13, Bert Münnich wrote:
> > >>i dont think this is a task for an image viewer. we should
> > >>probably write an ssetroot or so linking against imlib2 and
> > >>al
34 matches
Mail list logo
