Quoth Anselm R Garbe:
- is there anyone who uses the mouse functionality of the dwm bar
right now? Could you live without it?
I do use it sometimes, but could live without it. No strong
preferences.
I barely use the mouse for the dwm bar and would be in favour for
removing the bar
I rarely use the mouse functionality of the dwm bar and wouldn't miss it. I
would kind of miss the dwm bar if it went away, simply because I'd have to
find another solution.
Jamie
On 17 Nov 2012 13:42, Nick suckless-...@njw.me.uk wrote:
Quoth Anselm R Garbe:
- is there anyone who uses the
On 15 November 2012 01:01, neil klopfenstein rebr...@gmail.com wrote:
Attached is the diff of my changes. Please let me know if there's a better
way for me to submit this patch.
Thanks applied (slightly modified).
-Anselm
Greetings.
On Sat, 17 Nov 2012 18:58:22 +0100 Anselm R Garbe garb...@gmail.com wrote:
dwm
---
(i) First I plan a new dwm release with the introduction of draw{.h,c}
or libdraw. The idea is to abstract all the PCF/Xft cruft away from
the dwm implementation and to define a clean draw.h
Hi,
The mouse functionnality in dwm bar could become a patch, no more
mainline. I don't use it often, but when I do it's to launch a 9menu.
I concur with Nick about the bar, I need it and I trust the dwm one.
It's good to hear from you
Xavier
Le 18:20:03 le 17 nov. 2012 , Anselm R Garbe a
Good to hear you're back
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Anselm R Garbe garb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
I'm back in the game ;)
Here is my master plan:
dwm
---
(i) First I plan a new dwm release with the introduction of draw{.h,c}
or libdraw. The idea is to abstract all the
On 17 November 2012 18:58, Christoph Lohmann 2...@r-36.net wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2012 18:58:22 +0100 Anselm R Garbe garb...@gmail.com wrote:
I’m all for draw.{h,c}. Otherwise the complexity of dependency handling
will need to be added to all of the packages using libdraw. There might
be a
you know what, i take beck what i said about a couple of things:
1) while separating out common drawing functionality in to a librady
is appealing.
i don't think all suckless apps should be depending on an external
source. they're
all independent right now. and i've only incrementally started
Hi,
On Sat, 17 Nov 2012, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
(iii) A third idea is an old idea that 20h brought into the discussion
when investigating 2wm. The man page of 2wm mentions sbar, which was
abandoned a couple of years ago. My question here is:
- is there anyone who uses the mouse functionality
Anselm R Garbe garb...@gmail.com wrote:
(iii) A third idea is an old idea that 20h brought into the discussion
when investigating 2wm. The man page of 2wm mentions sbar, which was
abandoned a couple of years ago. My question here is:
- is there anyone who uses the mouse functionality of the
2012/11/17 Anselm R Garbe garb...@gmail.com
Hi there,
Hi.
I'm back in the game ;)
Welcome back!
(i) First I plan a new dwm release with the introduction of draw{.h,c}
or libdraw. The idea is to abstract all the PCF/Xft cruft away from
the dwm implementation and to define a clean draw.h
What's wrong with Arch?
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 1:11 PM, clamiax smo...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/11/17 Anselm R Garbe garb...@gmail.com
Hi there,
Hi.
I'm back in the game ;)
Welcome back!
(i) First I plan a new dwm release with the introduction of draw{.h,c}
or libdraw. The idea is to
On 11/17/12 at 01:15pm, Newton Smartt wrote:
What's wrong with Arch?
systemd is probably frowned upon around here.
For whatever it's worth (which is not much since I don't contribute much of
anything to this community anyway), I hardly touch the mouse and wouldn't
even notice if mouse functionality was removed from the bar. I do like
having the bar managed by DWM though. The fewer external programs I have
to
Greetings.
On Sat, 17 Nov 2012 20:26:09 +0100 Manolo Martínez man...@austrohungaro.com
wrote:
On 11/17/12 at 01:15pm, Newton Smartt wrote:
What's wrong with Arch?
systemd is probably frowned upon around here.
People proposing systemd are likely pedophiles or terrorists. The only
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 06:20:03PM +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
sta.li
--
To me archlinux was a good distro until a couple of years ago.
Nowadays it seems to be very en vogue and thus has degraded quite
significantly in terms of simplicity. I'm not aware of any distro that
would come
I know that some of you are inclined to use dwm on tablets. But I'm
not convinced that tablets or touch interfaces in general are a nice
fit with the terminal world we live in.
tablets are used to read pdfs, and tablets do not have keyboards.
however, while i didn't quite parse your whole
I use the mouse quite a bit to switch tags when working with virtual
machines and RDP sessions that fill my screen, less the bar. Bringing
mouse support in via patch wouldn't be a big deal.
On 11/17/12, Anselm R Garbe garb...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, I've heard enough.
The built-in bar stays as is, but I will organize its code in a way,
that dwm can be compiled without the bar.
Best regards,
-Anselm
sounds like a very useful thing, I can betatest if you like.
On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 00:25:16 +0200
Marc Weber marco-owe...@gmx.de wrote:
resources * expected_users = waste of energy
Thus you should also take into account how often a site is actually
viewed by users.
Best would be making browsers show a this page is going to drawn your
battery soon
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 06:20:03PM +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
dwm
---
(i) First I plan a new dwm release with the introduction of draw{.h,c}
or libdraw. The idea is to abstract all the PCF/Xft cruft away from
the dwm implementation and to define a clean draw.h interface to be
used instead.
lördagen den 17 november 2012 14.50.23 skrev Kurt H Maier:
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 06:20:03PM +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
sta.li
--
To me archlinux was a good distro until a couple of years ago.
Nowadays it seems to be very en vogue and thus has degraded quite
significantly in
22 matches
Mail list logo
