there goes the 'less' part
Pozdrawiam,
Łukasz Gruner
2012/11/29 Christoph Lohmann 2...@r-36.net:
Greetings comrades,
the migration to git is nearly complete. What’s missing is your tests
that everything works as expected.
Projects can be accessed via:
Quick question -
A long time ago I asked if it was possible to clone _all_ the hg
repositories without having to manually specify them from the suckless
site. The answer I got was no.
With the transfer to git, would it be possible for me to clone all of the
suckless
rofl
On 11/29/12, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero k...@shike2.com wrote:
Quick question -
A long time ago I asked if it was possible to clone _all_ the hg
repositories without having to manually specify them from the suckless
site. The answer I got was no.
With the transfer to
Greetings.
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 14:48:17 +0100 uki uka...@gmail.com wrote:
there goes the 'less' part
Pozdrawiam,
Łukasz Gruner
You must have had a wrong definition of »suckless« long before this hap‐
pened, if you think using a prototyping language for many years without
replacing it »sucks
(with apologies for screwing up threading slightly)
Thanks Christoph, looks good. One thing is that there don't appear
to be any tags (at least with surf, which is what I tested). Can
these be migrated too? It'd be useful.
Nick
On 29 November 2012 16:01, Nick suckless-...@njw.me.uk wrote:
(with apologies for screwing up threading slightly)
Thanks Christoph, looks good. One thing is that there don't appear
to be any tags (at least with surf, which is what I tested). Can
these be migrated too? It'd be useful.
You're
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 04:09:35PM +0200, Daniel Bainton wrote:
On 29 November 2012 16:01, Nick suckless-...@njw.me.uk wrote:
Thanks Christoph, looks good. One thing is that there don't appear
to be any tags (at least with surf, which is what I tested). Can
these be migrated too? It'd be
On 29/11/12 14:01 ;+, Nick wrote:
One thing is that there don't appear to be any tags (at least with
surf, which is what I tested).
Seems to work fine for me:
tony@morpheus ~ $ git clone git://git.suckless.org/surf
Cloning into 'surf'...
remote: Counting objects: 880, done.
remote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 02:15:36PM +, Anthony Cox wrote:
On 29/11/12 14:01 ;+, Nick wrote:
One thing is that there don't appear to be any tags (at least with
surf, which is what I tested).
Seems to work fine for me:
tony@morpheus ~ $ git clone git://git.suckless.org/surf
Hmm, I
On 29 November 2012 16:19, Nick suckless-...@njw.me.uk wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 02:15:36PM +, Anthony Cox wrote:
On 29/11/12 14:01 ;+, Nick wrote:
One thing is that there don't appear to be any tags (at least with
surf, which is what I tested).
Seems to work fine for me:
the http support in git is a hack. are you guys running git
update-server-info
after every commit? this is used to update the http information with the
.git
database..
On 11/29/12 15:20, Daniel Bainton wrote:
On 29 November 2012 16:19, Nick suckless-...@njw.me.uk wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012
pancake panc...@youterm.com writes:
the http support in git is a hack. are you guys running git
update-server-info
after every commit? this is used to update the http information with
the .git
database..
man githooks:
When enabled, the default post-update hook runs git update-server-info
Greetings.
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 17:59:57 +0100 Christian Neukirchen
chneukirc...@gmail.com wrote:
pancake panc...@youterm.com writes:
the http support in git is a hack. are you guys running git
update-server-info
after every commit? this is used to update the http information with
the
definitively, git sucks
On 11/29/12 17:59, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
Greetings.
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 17:59:57 +0100 Christian Neukirchen
chneukirc...@gmail.com wrote:
pancake panc...@youterm.com writes:
the http support in git is a hack. are you guys running git
update-server-info
after
Christoph Lohmann 2...@r-36.net writes:
Greetings.
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 17:59:57 +0100 Christian Neukirchen
chneukirc...@gmail.com wrote:
pancake panc...@youterm.com writes:
the http support in git is a hack. are you guys running git
update-server-info
after every commit? this is used
On 11/29/2012 02:25 AM, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
Greetings comrades,
Hello!
the migration to git is nearly complete. What’s missing is your tests
that everything works as expected.
Now I have a question:
How can be pathes for dwm be managerd via git?
I mean I need a patch queue
How can be pathes for dwm be managerd via git?
I mean I need a patch queue somehow, I'm thinking branches, I'll
create a local branch with my patches applied and I will hack
through its history.
I usually work in this way. After generate the patch sequence I get the diff
with git
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 09:33:23PM +0200, Barbu Paul - Gheorghe wrote:
On 11/29/2012 02:25 AM, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
Now I have a question:
How can be patches for dwm be managed via git?
I mean I need a patch queue somehow, I'm thinking branches, I'll
create a local branch with my patches
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 06:18:25PM +0100, pancake wrote:
definitively, git sucks
I could have told you that! lol
Mercurial is obviously much, much cleaner and simpler than git.
There's a reason why the suckless / cat-v / bell / google guys are using it.
Oh, wait...
The basic git system is
you can still use mercurial, with it's hg-git extension, I sometimes
had small problems with it on huge repositories at work, never had any
problem with open source projects (maybe it's the size or less of 'do
whatever' attitude)
Pozdrawiam,
Łukasz Gruner
2012/11/29 Barbu Paul - Gheorghe
Maybe it would be easier if we just write our own suckless git frontend using
libgit2. Without getoptlong and other monsters.
Just design a suckless workflow and implement it in a suckless tool.
I guess this tool can be also written in shellscript as a wrapper to git.
Btw, nobody commented
21 matches
Mail list logo
