On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 4:30 AM, Ivan Delalande col...@ycc.fr wrote:
Commit 5edeec1 introduced a wrong factor for nanosecond computation, the
correct
value is 1E6. Time and timeout values are 10 times less than they should be
and
this cause high CPU usage.
Reported by pyroh on IRC.
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Sylvain BERTRAND sylw...@legeek.net wrote:
I heard about GNU GPL version wars, was only aware of the benign
Linus T. one.
Let me laught:
Do you really think a GNU GPL version war can reasonnably
compensate the defect of code closing from MIT/BSD-like
Careful, all the previous cases will fall through.
Upss, stupid fail. I will redone the patch serie. Thanks!
--
Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
Commit 5edeec1 introduced a wrong factor for nanosecond computation, the
correct
value is 1E6. Time and timeout values are 10 times less than they should be
and
this cause high CPU usage.
Applied!!!, thanks.
--
Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 09:14:11 +0200
Silvan Jegen s.je...@gmail.com wrote:
Nice!
I can confirm that this patch makes a big difference on the VM I use
at work. Even typing in st is slow without this patch applied.
Sorry for not noticing this! I assumed (10E6 == 10^6). I'm sure this
won't
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 12:49 PM, FRIGN d...@frign.de wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 09:14:11 +0200
Silvan Jegen s.je...@gmail.com wrote:
Nice!
I can confirm that this patch makes a big difference on the VM I use
at work. Even typing in st is slow without this patch applied.
Sorry for not
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 05:30:04 +0200
Sylvain BERTRAND sylw...@legeek.net wrote:
Well, I disagree on that point with Kernighan Pike (The Unix
Programming Environment, pg. 241).
Why do you disagree?
And before you go open a new thread, don't do it! A response is
sufficient.
I consider this
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 12:58:34 +0200
Silvan Jegen s.je...@gmail.com wrote:
That's ok, bugs happen (and I did not see it when the patch was sent either).
I only noticed when I tested the patch that fixed the issue (because I
was running a version without the problematic commit. Otherwise I
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:35:39PM -0600, Anthony J. Bentley wrote:
Sylvain BERTRAND writes:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 09:32:33PM -0600, Anthony J. Bentley wrote:
Sylvain BERTRAND writes:
I firmely disagree with you on this: the event of somebody hurt
by the GNU GPL with real life facts
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 01:04:09PM +0200, FRIGN wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 05:30:04 +0200
Sylvain BERTRAND sylw...@legeek.net wrote:
Well, I disagree on that point with Kernighan Pike (The Unix
Programming Environment, pg. 241).
Why do you disagree?
And before you go open a new
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 05:57:13PM +0900, Philip Rushik wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Sylvain BERTRAND sylw...@legeek.net wrote:
I heard about GNU GPL version wars, was only aware of the benign
Linus T. one.
Let me laught:
Do you really think a GNU GPL version war can
Hi Sylvain!
You must be new here. People on this list mainly lurk watching progress
of suckless software. There are two kinds of threads here:
1. Patches and development of suckless software - strictly technical.
2. The rest - recommendations/questions for/about suckless
Hadrian,
please do not tell that you represent everyone, you don't. Also what you
just said is like your opinion, man.
13 matches
Mail list logo
