Re: [dev] [st] question about 24-bit color support

2015-06-02 Thread Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
Hi, But fg is defined as a ushort. [4] typedef struct { Rune u; /* character code */ ushort mode; /* attribute flags */ ushort fg;/* foreground */ ushort bg;/* background */

Re: [dev] [st] segfault with true color output

2015-06-02 Thread Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
Hi, On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 12:01:20PM -0400, s j wrote: printf \e[38;2;255;255;255mTRUECOLOR Thanks for the bug report. I think this bug is not related to the other problem reported (the incorrect data size for fg and bg), but if you can try after reverting the commit 7ab6c92 it will be useful

Re: [dev] [surf] Using more memory than firefox

2015-06-02 Thread tautolog
Hi Ivan, You can isolate data by just adding another key to all queries, but that has to be effectively done for all data access, which is the hard part. For example, there is a window.name DOM property that is used as a window cookie. That access would need to be keyed by origin to properly

Re: [dev] [abduco] Strange behavior with abduco -A

2015-06-02 Thread Ross Mohn
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 09:56:49PM +0200, Michael Hauser wrote: Quoth Ross Mohn: Hi, After my last pull a few weeks ago, I started noticing some strange behavior with abduco and I want to know if others can reproduce it. Here are the steps: 1) Run 'abduco -A foo ping suckless.org'

Re: [dev] [abduco] Strange behavior with abduco -A

2015-06-02 Thread Teodoro Santoni
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 04:11:28PM -0400, Ross Mohn wrote: On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 09:56:49PM +0200, Michael Hauser wrote: Quoth Ross Mohn: Hi, After my last pull a few weeks ago, I started noticing some strange behavior with abduco and I want to know if others can reproduce it.

Re: [dev] [abduco] Strange behavior with abduco -A

2015-06-02 Thread 7heo
Stop using arch. Hipsters never solved any problem. Solved. On June 2, 2015 10:11:28 PM CEST, Ross Mohn rpm...@waxandwane.org wrote: On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 09:56:49PM +0200, Michael Hauser wrote: Quoth Ross Mohn: Hi, After my last pull a few weeks ago, I started noticing some strange

Re: [dev] [surf] Using more memory than firefox

2015-06-02 Thread Ivan Tham
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 01:34:28PM -0700, tauto...@gmail.com wrote: When I look at top, I see a lot of memory usage, but most of that is shared mappings. What I look at is the active memory use, and virtual memory statistics, to see what is going on with memory. The only performance issue I

Re: [dev] [st] segfault with true color output

2015-06-02 Thread s j
Reverting 7ab6c92 fixes the issue. Thanks, Robert! -- Stephen

Re: [dev] no-confing-file orthodoxy

2015-06-02 Thread Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
S. R. Gal said: What if I want some blue and orange dwm because the stock choice pale-ish blue and grey (in the 5.x days) is in humble my opinion ugly? I have a question about the no-config-file policy. What if there are multiple user with different color scheme taste? Should be separete

Re: [dev] no-confing-file orthodoxy

2015-06-02 Thread 7heo
Yes. On June 2, 2015 12:55:54 PM CEST, FRIGN d...@frign.de wrote: On Tue, 2 Jun 2015 12:47:56 +0200 S. R. Gal swiatoslaw@univie.ac.at wrote: I have a question about the no-config-file policy. What if there are multiple user with different color scheme taste? Should be separete binaries

Re: [dev] no-confing-file orthodoxy

2015-06-02 Thread FRIGN
On Tue, 2 Jun 2015 12:47:56 +0200 S. R. Gal swiatoslaw@univie.ac.at wrote: I have a question about the no-config-file policy. What if there are multiple user with different color scheme taste? Should be separete binaries the only option? Or, is it so rare that your girlfriends use

[dev] no-confing-file orthodoxy

2015-06-02 Thread S. R. Gal
What if I want some blue and orange dwm because the stock choice pale-ish blue and grey (in the 5.x days) is in humble my opinion ugly? I have a question about the no-config-file policy. What if there are multiple user with different color scheme taste? Should be separete binaries the only

Re: [dev] [surf] Using more memory than firefox

2015-06-02 Thread Ivan Tham
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 09:54:46AM -0700, tauto...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Ivan, Also, I prefer to isolate state between different browser windows/tabs. ‎If firefox is sharing process state between windows, and saving memory usage that way, then I see it as a security design issue.  Hi, Is

Re: [dev] surf release?

2015-06-02 Thread Jack L. Frost
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 02:59:00PM +0200, Christoph Lohmann wrote: I could push out more releases and tag nearly every new feature that’s stable, if you like. But here’s my view that struggles me. I am using releases to reconsider what’s done in the project and what could be done next.

Re: [dev] [surf] Using more memory than firefox

2015-06-02 Thread stanio
* Ivan Tham 2015-06-02 16:37 Extra: How do I open a link in surf using the keyboard in the current window and in a new window? vanilla surf: when carret browsing is active, you may search for the link's text and press enter (opens in the current window). otherwise: look at the

[dev] [abduco] Strange behavior with abduco -A

2015-06-02 Thread Ross Mohn
Hi, After my last pull a few weeks ago, I started noticing some strange behavior with abduco and I want to know if others can reproduce it. Here are the steps: 1) Run 'abduco -A foo ping suckless.org' 2) Press 'CTRL+\' to detach 3) Run 'abduco -A foo' to reattach 4) Press 'CTRL+\' and it