);
soup_session_add_feature(w.session, SOUP_SESSION_FEATURE(w.jar));
When I do this I can use multiple processes to access and write to the
cookies. Logging out in one process will logout me from the website in
another process using the same site, once I reload the page.
I hope this makes sense!
Calvin Morrison
[1
On 21 February 2012 13:22, Christoph Lohmann 2...@r-36.net wrote:
Greetings.
Calvin Morrison wrote:
I have written my own tabbed browser called sb [1], it has cookie
handling built in very simple and the cookie file is a flat file
format. This is all done with libsoup.
The code required
was merely posting here to point out something possibly helpful. I
guess that warrants an attack on myself.
no
thank you for your helpful input.
Goodbye,
Calvin Morrison
On 21 February 2012 14:30, Kurt H Maier khm-suckl...@intma.in wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 02:07:28PM -0500, Calvin Morrison wrote:
I suppose it shows the attitude of the list.
what it shows is some self-righteous thin-skinned internet guy
I was merely posting here to point out something
as far as I can tell.
Also Integrating further into libsoup could prove productive. We use
the SoupCookieJar cookie policy, which would allow the user to accept
all, deny all or deny 3rd party cookies automagically [2]
Just looking into libsoup a little bit now and spouting off some ideas.
Calvin
On 21 February 2012 18:36, Peter Hartman peterjohnhart...@gmail.com wrote:
This is stil is favorable than the current approach as far as I can tell.
Why?
I was thinking it would be a more conscise method (also as libsoup
changes - though as I am looking increasingly through it, it seems
that
number of sites rely on this being possible. The
naive approach used in sb is not by itself useful (as already mentioned
by Calvin Morrison), and I just haven't been motivated enough to do the
heavier glib programming necessary to do a proper integration. As I
remember my analysis, you can't use
On 22 February 2012 08:36, Troels Henriksen at...@sigkill.dk wrote:
Calvin Morrison mutanttur...@gmail.com writes:
But, since we write out to the cookie jar frequently, wouldn't it be
inefficient to be constantly re reading (and reparsing) the entire
cookie file?
Yes, but we're already
On 22 February 2012 09:17, Troels Henriksen at...@sigkill.dk wrote:
Calvin Morrison mutanttur...@gmail.com writes:
On 22 February 2012 08:36, Troels Henriksen at...@sigkill.dk wrote:
Calvin Morrison mutanttur...@gmail.com writes:
But, since we write out to the cookie jar frequently, wouldn't
On 22 February 2012 10:35, Troels Henriksen at...@sigkill.dk wrote:
Calvin Morrison mutanttur...@gmail.com writes:
On 22 February 2012 09:17, Troels Henriksen at...@sigkill.dk wrote:
Calvin Morrison mutanttur...@gmail.com writes:
On 22 February 2012 08:36, Troels Henriksen at...@sigkill.dk
On 22 February 2012 11:50, Peter Hartman peterjohnhart...@gmail.com wrote:
It is pretty silly to write surf, which rides on the Hotspur of
webkit-gtk, and then not utilize whatever cookie apparatus that
Hotspur offers. Of course, if it offers us a really shitty cookie
apparatus, then what is
On 29 February 2012 18:06, Florian Limberger
f...@snakeoilproductions.net wrote:
Greetings list,
I think about giving a short talk about C and why to use it on a small
student event at my local university this weekend.
Does anybody have pointers to some stuff like that?
Thanks,
flo
On Mar 26, 2012 9:35 AM, hiro 23h...@googlemail.com wrote:
OR: You could leave it in since there is a growing userbase.
Why don't we have a democratic poll then?
What is the motive to move surf? Many users I think like it.
Regards,
Calvin
On 26 March 2012 17:10, hiro 23h...@googlemail.com wrote:
I'm fighting hard to bring you Democracy. If you don't like Democracy
you can file a complaint.
Please file all complains at Department of Annoying Trolls at Bureau
of Public Internet Sanity.
On 5 April 2012 13:31, Anselm R Garbe garb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 April 2012 22:29, Jan Christoph Ebersbach j...@e-jc.de wrote:
What needs to be done to get the systray patch upstream into dwm? Is there
any chance of getting it upstream or is it a total no go?
It is a total no go. It is
On 7 April 2012 14:35, Lee Fallat ircsurfe...@gmail.com wrote:
Xft and Systray would be implemented by a separate program and all the
fruitless discussions about the visual stuff, would come to an end.
This sounds like a wonderful solution, but I can't see how dwm's status bar
can be
On Apr 25, 2012 7:18 AM, Rob robpill...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 April 2012 08:16, hiro 23h...@googlemail.com wrote:
This is about the lamest usecase for slock I've ever heard of.
Next people will complain locking the toilet door with it didn't work
and someone saw their junk. Prepare to get
On 24 May 2012 11:55, Connor Lane Smith c...@lubutu.com wrote:
Hey,
On 24 May 2012 15:12, Hannes Blut blut.han...@googlemail.com wrote:
This is not required for a 1024x768 resolution and most people have
higher resolutions than this. This doesn't need to be mainline.
Are you serious? I know
Why not just pass the argument from a file?
Exec --flag `cat password-file`
Sorry for top posting
On Jun 14, 2012 10:41 PM, Andrew Hills hills...@gmail.com wrote:
If you don't want the password argument to appear in ps/top listings,
you can write over argv like curl does (see references to
On Jun 15, 2012 6:13 PM, Kurt H Maier khm-suckl...@intma.in wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 05:28:14PM -0400, Calvin Morrison wrote:
Why not just pass the argument from a file?
Exec --flag `cat password-file`
hahahah
What is so funny?
Ah how silly of me
On Jun 16, 2012 8:06 AM, Andrew Hills hills...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Calvin Morrison mutanttur...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Jun 15, 2012 6:13 PM, Kurt H Maier khm-suckl...@intma.in wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 05:28:14PM -0400, Calvin Morrison
On Jun 19, 2012 6:52 AM, Troels Henriksen at...@sigkill.dk wrote:
pancake panc...@youterm.com writes:
On 06/19/12 12:45, Troels Henriksen wrote:
Swiatoslaw Gal swiatoslaw@univie.ac.at writes:
Is anyone planning to port surf for gtk3?
Once I have a system that uses GTK3, I'd have
On 19 June 2012 09:48, Luis Anaya papoan...@hotmail.com wrote:
Calvin Morrison mutanttur...@gmail.com writes:
Is anyone planning to port surf for gtk3?
Once I have a system that uses GTK3, I'd have to do it.
are you from the past?
Pretty close: I use Slackware.
I am wondering
On 19 June 2012 11:20, pancake panc...@youterm.com wrote:
On 06/19/12 17:11, Calvin Morrison wrote:
On 19 June 2012 09:48, Luis Anaya papoan...@hotmail.com wrote:
Calvin Morrison mutanttur...@gmail.com writes:
Is anyone planning to port surf for gtk3?
Once I have a system that uses GTK3
On 19 June 2012 11:42, Jakub Lach jakub_l...@mailplus.pl wrote:
Yes, I still have Qt3 and GTK1 on my systems :-)
Yes, I still have no Qt or GTK whatsoever.
You must be very proud of yourself?
On 19 June 2012 12:53, Jakub Lach jakub_l...@mailplus.pl wrote:
Dnia 19 czerwca 2012 18:33 Luis Anaya papoan...@hotmail.com napisał(a):
Andrew Hills hills...@gmail.com writes:
You must be very proud of yourself?
Yes, it is very difficult to use a computer without bloat. It is like a
chair
.
Attached file is the trivial patch to disable outputting for dmenu-4.5.
On 6/19/12, pancake panc...@youterm.com wrote:
On 06/19/12 17:11, Calvin Morrison wrote:
All of that, to say - we cannot (and I don't think anyone does)
pretend that surf's underlying core doesn't suck - glib is a
nightmare
or
hack dmenu. I prefer the former, because I see no other use except a
browser for multiline text editing in dmenu.
Any other problems? I, in fact, am interested, though I am not sure if
I want to kill myself playing with WebKit.
On 6/19/12, Calvin Morrison mutanttur...@gmail.com wrote
On 3 July 2012 16:15, hiro 23h...@gmail.com wrote:
back to your work engineer!
On 7/3/12, Andrew Hills hills...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Kurt H Maier khm-suckl...@intma.in
wrote:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 12:54:50PM +0200, Kai Hendry wrote:
On 31 July 2012 16:14, Lee Fallat ircsurfe...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah I saw this today as well and looks to be promising, but what's wrong
with ALSA? :)
...ok fine you caught me, everything is wrong with alsa
This is always a good laugh
On Aug 1, 2012 8:17 AM, Marc Andre Tanner m...@brain-dump.org wrote:
Hi,
I've released dvtm-0.8
http://www.brain-dump.org/projects/dvtm/dvtm-0.8.tar.gz
Changes since last release
* AIX support (special thanks to Ross Mohn)
* Cygwin compile fix
* terminal emulation correctness
On 2 August 2012 07:31, Martin Kopta mar...@kopta.eu wrote:
On 08/02/2012 01:20 PM, hiro wrote:
why not a C-to-awk compiler?
Written in Perl. NOW we are finally getting somewhere.
I think cut is exactly the kind of job that awk (or sed) can be good
for. It seems crazy not to use an
But why does he want to go? Is he sick of the philosophical bs, trolling,
or top posters like me?
The world demands an answer!
Calvin
On Aug 10, 2012 8:24 PM, Carlos Torres vlaadbr...@gmail.com wrote:
he just had to click on that now
On Aug 10, 2012 7:41 PM, Kurt H Maier khm-suckl...@intma.in
Hey all,
Recently on the Arch mailing list there has been much discussion of
different init systems. I was just wondering which init system, y'all
approve of. SysV or OpenRC pretty suckless and unix-y to me.
What do you think?
Calvin
On 14 August 2012 13:50, Kurt H Maier khm-suckl...@intma.in wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 01:36:55PM -0400, Calvin Morrison wrote:
Hey all,
Recently on the Arch mailing list there has been much discussion of
different init systems. I was just wondering which init system, y'all
approve
On 28 August 2012 11:31, Kurt H Maier khm-suckl...@intma.in wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 05:24:40PM +0200, clamiax wrote:
I just trust some people here and I wanted an opinion. I know this is
somewhat irritating. Sorry dear.
noise goes in irc
I dunno, there's quite a bit of
On 30 August 2012 14:40, s...@9front.org wrote:
Executables in etc? :)
Aside from the historical precedent, even OpenBSD runs scripts located in
/etc.
-sl
I don't really care where my executables are as long as my paths are
setup correctly. Which they are.
On 14 October 2012 17:41, Václav Novák darmon...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, this is my first post to this mailing list... Rest in peace, Uriel.
Tonight, I am drinking for you.
On Oct 14, 2012 11:14 PM, Kurt H Maier khm-suckl...@intma.in wrote:
Sorry to have to let you guys know, uriel passed
On 14 October 2012 17:51, Kurt H Maier khm-suckl...@intma.in wrote:
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 05:43:51PM -0400, Calvin Morrison wrote:
I saw this on the plan 9 playlist. Does anyone have any proof? (jw)
Sure. Just wait twenty or thirty years and see if he says anything.
c'mon :p
found
On 19 October 2012 21:13, Strake strake...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19/10/2012, Calvin Morrison mutanttur...@gmail.com wrote:
I think the largest benefit is the cache. Loading up many
http://google.com's would mean you'd have to reload all of the images
and such, whereas with one process, you
On 25 October 2012 21:32, Strake strake...@gmail.com wrote:
Starch is a static-linked, Arch-based, highly experimental Linux
distro. I thought that some folks here may care to try it.
Packages: http://strake.zanity.net:1104/starch/pkg/(core, extra)
Build Scripts:
On 25 October 2012 21:40, Strake strake...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25/10/2012, Calvin Morrison mutanttur...@gmail.com wrote:
You're sticking with initscripts I presume?
Yes.
Excellent work.
Carry on good lad
transferring to another school that's more
challenging.
On Oct 31, 2012 1:50 PM, Calvin Morrison mutanttur...@gmail.com wrote:
An example we had to do for a quick in class activity was writing a
program to student names (in a text files) into a list and print out their
respective grades
Except that we need to learn how to use the tools thst exist instead if
implementing our own. You shouldn't need programing ability for something
like this
On Oct 31, 2012 2:53 PM, Brandon Invergo bran...@invergo.net wrote:
I quickly overcame the assignment with:
paste names.txt grades.txt
On 1 November 2012 11:39, hiro 23h...@gmail.com wrote:
calvin, please seek for a psychiatrist.
I'd really wish if you'd stop the random banter in all threads. I forget
the last time you contributed to a discussion -_-
On 6 November 2012 11:00, Christoph Lohmann 2...@r-36.net wrote:
Greetings.
On Tue, 06 Nov 2012 17:00:06 +0100 Andreas Krennmair a...@synflood.at
wrote:
* Christoph Lohmann 2...@r-36.net [2012-11-06 16:20]:
On Tue, 06 Nov 2012 16:10:33 +0100 Andreas Krennmair a...@synflood.at
wrote:
Right, but python is also an interpreted language, so you need to have the
python runtime installed. With other revision control systems I can ( in
theory ) distribute a standalone, static linked binary without having to
deal with any deps.
On 26 November 2012 10:10, pancake
On 26 November 2012 10:26, Kurt H Maier khm-suckl...@intma.in wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 04:10:46PM +0100, pancake wrote:
On 11/26/12 15:41, Kurt H Maier wrote:
everytime i proposed in mercurialchan to rewrite it in C, everybody
thought i was trolling or so.. i would also love to have
On 28 November 2012 19:25, Christoph Lohmann 2...@r-36.net wrote:
Greetings comrades,
the migration to git is nearly complete. What’s missing is your tests
that everything works as expected.
Projects can be accessed via:
http://git.suckless.org/$name
put it in the patches section of the wiki. Mostly here though there won't
be much interest. Full screening is a job for the window manager, not the
program.
On 3 December 2012 13:22, Krol, Willem van de 008...@jfc.nl wrote:
Hello all,
I have implemented fullscreen modus (F11) in surf (when
fantastic!
On 9 December 2012 10:29, Kai Hendry hen...@iki.fi wrote:
On 29 November 2012 12:13, Calvin Morrison mutanttur...@gmail.com wrote:
With the transfer to git, would it be possible for me to clone all of the
suckless repositories in one fell sweep?
curl -s http://git.suckless.org
On 6 February 2013 15:31, Manolo Martínez man...@austrohungaro.com wrote:
On 02/06/13 at 03:29pm, Peter Hartman wrote:
LaTeX
I use and love LaTeX, but LaTeX is *not* lightweight.
Right, but LaTeX definitely sucks. It's a mess! I also use firefox,
but that isn't suckless. I think we need to be
A little bit weird,
why not just remove the keyboard?
On 8 March 2013 12:23, Christian Hesse l...@eworm.de wrote:
Hello everybody,
I need a web browser that has no extras but shows a website. Additionally
it
may not accept any key stokes. So I added kiosk mode to surf which can be
enable
Another minimal browser is dillo. It is very small. I don't think it's
rendering is as good as netsurf but follows the same general gist.
- Calvin
On 10 March 2013 09:47, Chris Down ch...@chrisdown.name wrote:
I tried using netsurf a month or so ago. It seems that the layout
engine is still
On 29 March 2013 14:31, Nick suckless-...@njw.me.uk wrote:
So I came across Enlightenment's Terminology terminal emulator
today, and they have many features we don't.
I recommend skimming the ibPziLRGvkg youtube video.
How long before we can set videos as the background to our
terminals? I
On 29 March 2013 14:54, Raphaël Proust raphla...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Calvin Morrison mutanttur...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 29 March 2013 14:31, Nick suckless-...@njw.me.uk wrote:
[…]
While I find many of those features useless, some of them are plain
cool
Comrades,
I just spend about fifteen minutes writing this little tool that I call print:
http://mutantturkey.com/print/
All it does is print the specified line from a file.
example usage:
$ print constitution.txt 1
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union,
$
On 30 March 2013 21:49, Christian Neukirchen chneukirc...@gmail.com wrote:
Calvin Morrison mutanttur...@gmail.com writes:
What do you guys think of the tool? Of the code? It does one thing and
one thing well.
It has a format string vulnerability.
Good catch thank you!
Also, sed or awk do
On 30 March 2013 22:27, Charlie Kester corky1...@comcast.net wrote:
On 03/30/2013 18:28, Calvin Morrison wrote:
Comrades,
I just spend about fifteen minutes writing this little tool that I call
print:
http://mutantturkey.com/print/
All it does is print the specified line from a file
On 30 March 2013 22:30, Robert Ransom rransom.8...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/30/13, Calvin Morrison mutanttur...@gmail.com wrote:
What do you guys think of the tool? Of the code? It does one thing and
one thing well.
Or perhaps you're just learning C and wanted someone to review your code.
A bit
On Mar 31, 2013 9:57 AM, Charlie Kester corky1...@comcast.net wrote:
On 03/30/2013 23:49, Chris Down wrote:
I really don't see the need for a tool like this. Saying sed and awk are
not suckless is like saying C is not suckless -- sed and awk are
languages
with a very specific domain, text
On 10 April 2013 16:45, Alex Pilon a...@engsoc.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 01:13:51PM -0500, William Giokas wrote:
[…] you can actually disable almost every feature in systemd with
configure flags.
* You can't disable DBus.
Sure, sure, a lot of the rest of the world out there uses
On Apr 12, 2013 5:07 PM, hiro 23h...@gmail.com wrote:
can the moralfags please fuck off already?
Yes thank you.
This was about a windows port of st. No I do not think YOU are going to
enlighten us about this history of unix, the reaches of space or anything
another windows bashing thread
This is easy to do with webkit. Why respond if you don't have answers?
I spent literally two seconds googling it and gave me fine results.
http://webkitgtk.org/reference/webkitgtk/stable/WebKitWebSettings.html#WebKitWebSettings--default-font-family
On 15 April 2013 11:27, Hugues Moretto-Viry
Ftp sucks
On May 13, 2013 12:25 PM, Christoph Lohmann 2...@r-36.net wrote:
Greetings.
On Mon, 13 May 2013 18:21:40 +0200 Thuban thu...@singularity.fr wrote:
Hi suckless users,
I was wondering what tool or method you would use to purpose simple file
upload on your server (via an html form
alright if we are dreaming and scheming...
Why not have static pages which are all within a git repository? When
there is a change pushed to the server, a git hook could run the
re-generate script to recreate the static files in the appropriate
directories with the headers and such.
Calvin
On
On 18 June 2013 11:59, Alexander Huemer alexander.hue...@xx.vu wrote:
Maybe now?
I had just remembered the sbase project when I saw some other posts,
and remembered also when I was learning C my futile attempt at core
utils called core-futiles. The quality is poor
Now I know better.
Calvin
why not rc?
On 25 June 2013 10:10, Carlos Torres vlaadbr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Galos, David
galos...@students.rowan.edu wrote:
What is your opinion on a shell for sbase?
The shell is a topic around which there is far too much religion.
Sbase should not include
On 25 June 2013 10:45, Chris Down ch...@chrisdown.name wrote:
On 25 June 2013 22:42, Jesse Ogle jesse.p.o...@gmail.com wrote:
I understood sbase to have a loose correspondence to coreutils. Is
this the case? Coreutils does not have a shell, or am I wrong about
that?
GNU coreutils has no
my votes are for at a minimum are for:
sponge
tee
pee
On 25 June 2013 10:54, Daniel Bryan danbr...@gmail.com wrote:
first of all, some things in moreutils would be awesome
Especially if they weren't written in Perl.
On 25 June 2013 14:34, Galos, David galos...@students.rowan.edu wrote:
Isn't this just 'tee [file] /dev/null'?
No.
sponge sucks up stdin, waits till it is closed then puts it out to stdout
Hi,
please use plain text.
Thank you,
Calvin.
On 26 June 2013 20:51, Viola Zoltán violaz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, DWM users! I wrote a daemon to the DWM status bar! I send it in
attachment. The program name kajjam. Start it simple: ./kajjam
Compile it with this command:
g++ -funsigned-char
On 27 June 2013 02:43, Chris Down ch...@regentmarkets.com wrote:
On 27 June 2013 14:33, Martti Kühne mysat...@gmail.com wrote:
Still. What's pee good for? A quick google disappointed my
expectations in that matter.
It's for people that don't know how to use FIFOs/process substitution
I'm a sucker for transmission. The interface is clean and simple, it's
minimal in terms of features but delivers it in many ways. If you want
a gtk transmission OK! qt? OK! Web client? OK, CLI? ok! daemon? ok!
On 27 June 2013 22:28, oneofthem oneoft...@lavabit.com wrote:
Are there any?
mpv and
On 28 June 2013 21:51, Fernando C.V. ferk...@gmail.com wrote:
It's for people that don't know how to use FIFOs/process substitution
properly ;-)
should suffice:
cat file | tee (sort -u sorted) (sort -R unsorted)
That's a bashism, not POSIX. Not much better than using pee
--
Fernando
hiro,
did you drink your coffee before it was cool?
Sincerely,
Calvin Morrison
On 30 June 2013 17:59, hiro 23h...@gmail.com wrote:
And then stop those stupid questions without any intro‐
duction or greeting. You are disrespectuful and should not use other
people’s time
I'd use GTK, since writing programs for it isn't terrible, it's in C
and you can just draw to a pixel buffer.
It sucks, but isn't not so sucky
On 1 July 2013 17:34, David ad...@dav1d.de wrote:
Hello,
Less of a GUI, more of a do it yourself toolkit. You could write your own
little GUI toolkit
He's joking
On Jul 1, 2013 10:11 PM, Charlie Paul charli...@gmail.com wrote:
Write your UI as a Web application.
That wouldn't work, as movement needs to be low latency.
doesn't sponge soak up into memory, not into a file?
Calvin
On 2 July 2013 13:29, Galos, David galos...@students.rowan.edu wrote:
In my opinion it is okay to have sponge called
without arguments to write to stdout.
I disagree. The only use case I could think of was
something like this:
It also sucks. avoiding a temporary file is the whole point to sponge.
otherwise:
cat file | grep file file_temp; mv file_temp file;
On 2 July 2013 14:19, Galos, David galos...@students.rowan.edu wrote:
doesn't sponge soak up into memory, not into a file?
Soaking up into a file allows sponge
I'm failing to see the problem with loading everything into memory.
On 2 July 2013 15:39, Galos, David galos...@students.rowan.edu wrote:
It also sucks. avoiding a temporary file is the whole point to sponge.
otherwise:
cat file | grep file file_temp; mv file_temp file;
Actually, it would
How?
On 3 July 2013 08:13, hiro 23h...@gmail.com wrote:
won't this increase cache misses for everything else?
On 7/2/13, Calvin Morrison mutanttur...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 July 2013 15:50, Galos, David galos...@students.rowan.edu wrote:
I'm failing to see the problem with loading everything
On 2 July 2013 20:41, Galos, David galos...@students.rowan.edu wrote:
and also depends on having a non-read only filesystem
to write too.
You understand that in order to change the target file, the
filesystem needs to be writable, right?
What if I had extremely limited filespace though, or
Why don't we just use popen?
On Jul 7, 2013 3:24 AM, Markus Wichmann nullp...@gmx.net wrote:
On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 10:53:01PM -0500, Galos, David wrote:
I also see it a lot in scripts, along with using full options instead
of short--perhaps to be more verbose? So, for compatibility,
Hi guys,
I came up with a utility[0] that i think could be useful, and I sent
it to the moreutils page, but maybe it might fit better here. All it
does is give a count of files in a directory.
I was sick of ls | wc -l being so damned slow on large directories, so
I thought a more direct solution
I know there is a naming conflict, what does that have to do with the
usage of the program?
What was the last time you used the reverse polish notation calculator
that precedes the invention of C?
Thank you,
Calvin
On 17 July 2013 13:36, p37si...@lavabit.com wrote:
dc - desk calculator
Fine,
I retract my statement.
The name still this has nothing to do with the utility of the
statement. Please focus the conversation on that.
Calvin
On 17 July 2013 13:40, Chris Down ch...@regentmarkets.com wrote:
On 17 July 2013 19:38, Calvin Morrison mutanttur...@gmail.com wrote:
What
Thank you for your input Evan,
I've decided that renaming the file would probably only take one
command, and so I think another name might be possible to use.
Could we focus on the merit of the utility?
Thank you,
Calvin
On 17 July 2013 13:42, Evan Gates evan.ga...@gmail.com wrote:
Most of
On 17 July 2013 13:58, Chris Down ch...@regentmarkets.com wrote:
On 17 July 2013 19:43, Calvin Morrison mutanttur...@gmail.com wrote:
The name still this has nothing to do with the utility of the
statement. Please focus the conversation on that.
If you are going to release things to mailing
On 17 July 2013 14:07, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero k...@shike2.com wrote:
Could we focus on the merit of the utility?
I cannot imagine any period in time where this would have been useful
for me over a simple `set -- * echo $#', but whatever floats your
boat. Dependencies are much more
On 17 July 2013 16:32, Christian Neukirchen chneukirc...@gmail.com wrote:
Calvin Morrison mutanttur...@gmail.com writes:
Hi guys,
I came up with a utility[0] that i think could be useful, and I sent
it to the moreutils page, but maybe it might fit better here. All it
does is give a count
On 17 July 2013 16:58, Christian Neukirchen chneukirc...@gmail.com wrote:
Calvin Morrison mutanttur...@gmail.com writes:
On 17 July 2013 16:32, Christian Neukirchen chneukirc...@gmail.com wrote:
Calvin Morrison mutanttur...@gmail.com writes:
Hi guys,
I came up with a utility[0] that i
On 18 July 2013 11:33, Markus Wichmann nullp...@gmx.net wrote:
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 01:23:33PM -0400, Calvin Morrison wrote:
Hi guys,
I came up with a utility[0] that i think could be useful, and I sent
it to the moreutils page, but maybe it might fit better here. All it
does is give
On 18 July 2013 15:00, Galos, David galos...@students.rowan.edu wrote:
Based on the discussion in 'coreutils / moreutils - DC a directory counter'
I have optimized sbase ls to easily handle large directories. The major
change is that ls no longer calls 'lstat' on files if it does not have to.
On 22 July 2013 17:07, Chris Down ch...@regentmarkets.com wrote:
On 22 July 2013 18:52, Charlie Paul charli...@gmail.com wrote:
But now we are looking at an even more obscure situation.
If you really care, any POSIX shell should be able to do this as long
as you don't hit ARG_MAX:
set --
On 22 July 2013 17:41, Chris Down ch...@regentmarkets.com wrote:
On 22 July 2013 23:27, Calvin Morrison mutanttur...@gmail.com wrote:
This set command is simple, but still takes a long time, because the shell
spends a long time doing the globbing of the *
In any case that it matters, you
On 22 July 2013 18:18, Chris Down ch...@chrisdown.name wrote:
On 22 July 2013 23:44, Calvin Morrison mutanttur...@gmail.com wrote:
Why? Why is it ridiculous to want to be able to support medium sized
file directories, for example thousands of frames of a video, DNA
sequencing files and others
Im just trying to keep y'all consistent
On Jul 22, 2013 6:37 PM, Chris Down ch...@regentmarkets.com wrote:
On 23 July 2013 00:31, Calvin Morrison mutanttur...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay so then should we remove the sort option from ls altogether? It
isn't very suckless, and can be easily achieved
Its called unionfs if I recall
On Jul 25, 2013 9:28 PM, Thorsten Glaser t...@mirbsd.de wrote:
Calvin Morrison dixit:
I was sick of ls | wc -l being so damned slow on large directories, so
What, besides the printing and sorting, is the slow part anyway?
Is it the VFS API or just
Yes master
On Jul 26, 2013 3:40 AM, Thorsten Glaser t...@mirbsd.de wrote:
Calvin Morrison dixit:
Its called unionfs if I recall
No. Go read it again.
On Jul 25, 2013 9:28 PM, Thorsten Glaser t...@mirbsd.de wrote:
And stop top-posting and full-quoting.
Read http://www.afaik.de/usenet
1 - 100 of 213 matches
Mail list logo
