Re: [dev] [OT] Political Propaganda

2009-06-10 Thread Uriel
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Szabolcs Nagynszabo...@gmail.com wrote: On 6/8/09, Uriel lost.gob...@gmail.com wrote: I forgot to mention that the German Pirate Party has taken a more 'expansive' approach to their positions, and that actually has put off a few people I know from voting

Re: [dev] last request for a dev-only list

2009-06-11 Thread Uriel
(or don't even bother to open threads you aren't interested in, if I read every single email posted to every single list I'm subscribed to it would take me more than 24/7 of email reading just to keep up). Peace uriel P.S.: Perhaps having chat@ for random crap and relegating dev@ for only technical

Re: [dev] Suckless (*NIX|*BSD) Distribution?

2009-06-20 Thread Uriel
Agreed, OpenBSD is far from perfect, but it sucks much less than any other *nix system out there this days. Peace uriel On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Jack Woehrj...@well.com wrote: There's already a BSD distrib that sucks less. It's called OpenBSD! -- Jack J. Woehr            # I run

Re: [dev] unsubscribe

2009-06-21 Thread Uriel
This list has become like the internet's kindergarten... And Erik Naggum is dead, just when the world needs him most, what a sad day :( uriel On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 6:26 AM, Kris Maglionemaglion...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 12:18:15PM +0800, Ludovic Guégan wrote: Same to me

Re: [dev] dwm development continues NOW

2009-06-21 Thread Uriel
in the software industry. uriel On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 5:43 PM, hiro23h...@googlemail.com wrote: As said, don't miss that all these efforts will be kept at its most minimalist solution. Easily said... It is the Sensible Solution[tm] to do it the way he suggests. ... Separating interface

Re: [dev] dwm development continues NOW

2009-06-21 Thread Uriel
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 3:28 AM, Jack Woehrj...@well.com wrote: Enno Boland (Gottox) wrote: 2009/6/21 Uriel lost.gob...@gmail.com: Excessive and naive obsession with code reuse is one of the major sources of gratuitous complexity in the software industry. Ooh! Nice. Having an idea

Re: [dev] Suckless (*NIX|*BSD) Distribution?

2009-06-22 Thread Uriel
and pointless, and anyone using it is a masochist at best. uriel 4- Going to dev versions of needed (for patches for example) doesn't means you need to wait 6 months for it. -- Sincerely, Antony Jepson /  anton...@gmail.com / GPG Key: 0xFA10ED80

Re: [dev] XCB: An alternative to Xlib

2009-06-23 Thread Uriel
DSLs are great, but that is no excuse to build systems so insanely broken and complex that you need to generate all of the code to implement a protocol because it is too insanely complex to be done properly. The whole thing stinks way too much of CORBA/SOAP... uriel On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10

[dev] Programming quotes.

2009-07-01 Thread Uriel
Just updated my online programming quotes archive, it contains some quotes that in my opinion have inspired much of the 'suckless' software philosophy, so take a look and lets use this thread to post your favorite programming quotes. http://quotes.cat-v.org/programming Enjoy uriel

Re: [dev] Programming quotes.

2009-07-01 Thread Uriel
Haha, thanks for spotting that, I wonder if it was on purpose :) I fixed it anyway. uriel On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Jacob Toddjaketodd...@gmail.com wrote: This is offtopic, but in fortunes.cat-v.org/kernelnewbies, the following quote is there twice: % Thanks, and THIS time it really

Re: [dev] Programming quotes.

2009-07-01 Thread Uriel
I don't know, but it clearly seems a logical argument that Kris is making. Trying to apply logic and consistency to writing and language is hard, but well worth it. (I'm very bad at it, I might add.) On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 4:13 AM, Kurt H Maierkarmaf...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at

Re: [dev] Programming quotes.

2009-07-02 Thread Uriel
Maybe nobody cares about C#? It hardly seems worth even making fun of, and as Kurt well points out just going to http://harmful.cat-v.org/software/java and doing a mental s/Java/C#/ should do just fine if you really want quotes about C# uriel On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Jacob Toddjaketodd

Re: [dev] surf: web browser on archlinux

2009-07-03 Thread Uriel
works just fine. Also I was wondering if surf implements the traditional Unix text editing keybindings: http://unix-kb.cat-v.org I *hate* when ff or any other stupid browser closes the window/tab when I press ^W to *delete the previous word* (as God meant it to do). uriel

Re: [dev] surf: web browser on archlinux

2009-07-03 Thread Uriel
I wrote a chrome extension that fixes this ;) http://repo.cat-v.org/burning_chrome/hosaka/ I might write a similar extension for Firefox some day.. uriel On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Kurt H Maierkarmaf...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Uriellost.gob...@gmail.com wrote

Re: [dev] surf: web browser on archlinux

2009-07-03 Thread Uriel
imply shared libs or some such crap. Using factotum doesn't make it a requirement, it is just a convenient way to handle auth and passwords. uriel

Re: [dev] surf: web browser on archlinux

2009-07-03 Thread Uriel
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Claudio M. Alessismo...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 09:51:59AM -0500, Kurt H Maier wrote: this is the biggest reason I hate firefox too.  ^u should not view source, it should erase the damn line. I guess you (and Uriel) would be happy

Re: [dev] surf: web browser on archlinux

2009-07-03 Thread Uriel
for it. As for the lines of code, it is mostly external libs that they happen to include in their tree, if webkit did the same it would be many millions of lines. uriel On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Szabolcs Nagynszabo...@gmail.com wrote: On 7/3/09, Uriel lost.gob...@gmail.com wrote: to go, at the moment

Re: [dev] dwm in a window

2009-07-07 Thread Uriel
to build a new window system, that IMHO seems like a natural starting point. uriel On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 5:58 PM, David Tweeddavid.tw...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Kurt H Maierkarmaf...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Anselm R Garbegarb...@gmail.com wrote

Re: [dev] dwm in a window

2009-07-08 Thread Uriel
replace the whole model with something sensible like libdraw. uriel On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 11:17 AM, hiro23h...@googlemail.com wrote: Sorry, but this sounds complicated. On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 10:57 AM, yyyiyu@gmail.com wrote: 2009/7/5 Alexander Polakov polac...@gmail.com:  Well, explaining

Re: [dev] 9base awk bug

2009-07-20 Thread Uriel
P9p now includes awk, one less reason to use 9base. uriel On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 6:32 PM, quinq...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I tried to build 9base, and I encountered the following error: In file included from awk.h:184, from re.c:34: proto.h:134: error: conflicting types

Re: [dev] wmii next release

2009-08-03 Thread Uriel
release in the near future for some years now... uriel

Re: [dev] 9base-3

2009-08-13 Thread Uriel
I don't have a lifetime to spend studying all the debian arcana and follow their byzantine bureaucracy. uriel On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 11:57 PM, Preben Randholrand...@pvv.org wrote: On Fri, 7 Aug 2009 22:00:48 +0200 Uriel lost.gob...@gmail.com wrote: To me, the only difference is that unlike

Re: [dev] [st] goals / non-goals for st?

2009-08-25 Thread Uriel
the official README, it's kind of scary: Never mind garbeam, he is being delusional as usual. uriel                        Abandon All Hope, Ye Who Enter Here This is undoubtedly the most ugly program in the distribution.  It was one of the first serious programs ported, and still has a lot

Re: [dev] [st] goals / non-goals for st?

2009-08-25 Thread Uriel
with GNU stuff? Wrong question. What is *right* with GNU? I mean - why hate it? :) Because it is a disease. Peace uriel

Re: [dev] [st] goals / non-goals for st?

2009-08-25 Thread Uriel
the retards out there... uriel

Re: [dev] 9base-4

2009-08-27 Thread Uriel
Awesome, this should be enough to run werc. Thanks! uriel On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 8:07 PM, Anselm R Garbegarb...@gmail.com wrote: Hi there, I just released 9base-4, which can be downloaded from: http://dl.suckless.org/tools/9base-4.tar.gz It includes some new commands such as troff, mk

Re: [dev] dwm is awesome!

2009-08-28 Thread Uriel
. We see it with new Plan 9 users *all the time*. uriel In any case, you don't need to write that code yourself - it's in suckless wiki.

Re: [dev] dwm is awesome!

2009-08-30 Thread Uriel
nobody uses it, unless you want to run some crap linux software with linuxemu. uriel I wonder why... I'll revisit it tonight (or tomorrow night) if running Plan9 Xless is indeed possible.

Re: [dev] A lightwieight and working typesetting system.

2009-09-03 Thread Uriel
Have retards taken over suckless? Or is this all some big sick joke? uriel On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 11:31 AM, thomasthomas@gmail.com wrote: 2009/9/2  hessi...@hessiess.com: I recommend type setting using HTML. I second this: HTML, then a conversion to pdf. HTML is useless for document

Re: [dev] [surf] gtk key bindings

2009-09-06 Thread Uriel
In theory you should be able to use the instructions at: http://unix-kb.cat-v.org/GTK_2/ Any further contributions about hot to provide sane Unix-like keybindings to more apps and environments are very welcome. Peace uriel On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 7:53 PM, Ryan Zhenggne...@gmail.com wrote: I've

Re: [dev] Talk about sane web browsers

2009-09-06 Thread Uriel
Troff works great for generating slides. uriel On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 11:31 PM, Kris Maglionemaglion...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 09:36:23PM +0200, markus schnalke wrote: P.S. (especially @Uriel ;-) ): Please don't blame me because the software I used for the slides ... I know

Re: [dev] Talk about sane web browsers

2009-09-06 Thread Uriel
, but development seems to be fast and they are moving forward quite fast. Peace uriel [1]: Of course there can't be a sane web browser, but a different coat of paint on top of webkit is not going to be any saner than Chrome, and unlike all this so called sane browsers at least Chrome mostly got

Re: [dev] [libixp] Fix build on case insensitive FS

2009-09-06 Thread Uriel
', they are a disease and anyone found using such a FS should be exterminated on the spot to keep the disease from spreading. uriel I've been assured that wmii and libixp build fine on Darwin/OS-X's case-insensitive HFS. The problem with CIFS, I think, is mandatory file locking, which among other things

Re: [dev] Talk about sane web browsers

2009-09-07 Thread Uriel
only hope for a minimally sane web rendering engine is http://www.netsurf-browser.org/ The latest released version is not too useful, but development seems to be fast and they are moving forward quite fast. Peace uriel [1]: Of course there can't be a sane web browser, but a different coat

Re: [dev] Talk about sane web browsers

2009-09-07 Thread Uriel
out of the box and that's definitely a more suckless version of document rendering / scripting than HTML + Javascript. You better kick yourself out of this universe. WTF are you smoking? uriel I got the idea then that it may not be a bad idea to develop a suckless document rendering

Re: [dev] Talk about sane web browsers

2009-09-07 Thread Uriel
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Jacob Toddjaketodd...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 07:33:19PM +0200, Uriel wrote: ruled by a religion I thought you were a 'utopian philosopher'? Everyone knows that in a utopia there would be no religion. No religion? What is wrong with *my

Re: [dev] slides with troff (was: Talk about sane web browsers)

2009-09-07 Thread Uriel
I have always used troff to generate really nice 4:3 landscape slides, but that is on Plan 9, I should put my macros and some examples in http://repo.cat-v.org but it really is not rocket science. uriel On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 9:53 PM, markus schnalkemei...@marmaro.de wrote: [2009-09-07 01:27

Re: [dev] Talk about sane web browsers

2009-09-07 Thread Uriel
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 3:13 AM, Pinocchiocchino...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, 07 Sep 2009 03:26:05 -0700, frederic fduboi...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, 07 Sep 2009 11:51:46 +0200, Uriel lost.gob...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 2:38 AM, Pinocchiocchino...@gmail.com wrote: A few months

Re: [dev] Talk about sane web browsers

2009-09-08 Thread Uriel
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:07 AM, Anselm R Garbegarb...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/9/8 Uriel lost.gob...@gmail.com: On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 9:35 PM, markus schnalkemei...@marmaro.de wrote: The point is: It is simply not possible to have sane web browsers. But you both come to bad results IMO. Uriel

Re: [dev] Talk about sane web browsers

2009-09-08 Thread Uriel
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Anselm R Garbegarb...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/9/8 Uriel lost.gob...@gmail.com: On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:07 AM, Anselm R Garbegarb...@gmail.com wrote: I think it is clear that the existing web stack can't be implemented in a less sucking way. This is ridiculous

Re: [dev] Talk about sane web browsers

2009-09-08 Thread Uriel
that if it was not for my judgement you would still be programming in C++, using auto*hell, praising Object Oriented programming as the greatest invention in the history of programming, and god only knows what else. Peace uriel Kind regards, Anselm

Re: [dev] Talk about sane web browsers

2009-09-08 Thread Uriel
is not for sissies. Oh, and see Wolfgang Pauli's quote here: http://quotes.cat-v.org/ uriel P.S.: And who is polluting the pristine snow of this list now? Go pee somewhere else, there is enough sewage around here as it is. /Don Kind regards, Anselm

Re: [dev] Talk about sane web browsers

2009-09-08 Thread Uriel
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:46 AM, Aurélien Aptelaurelien.ap...@gmail.com wrote: I also like Uriel's madness. His rants are always exaggerated, and as said Anselm you don't have to take them too seriously. He's just a cute troll (and you know the saying). Uriel, the suckless Tough Guy, filled

Re: [dev] slides with troff (was: Talk about sane web browsers)

2009-09-08 Thread Uriel
Ok, I put this together in five min while sleep deprived, but I think it still should be enough to get you started: http://repo.cat-v.org/troff-slider/ Enjoy. uriel On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 8:48 PM, Charlie Kestercorky1...@comcast.net wrote: On Tue 08 Sep 2009 at 10:38:26 PDT markus schnalke

Re: [dev] Talk about sane web browsers

2009-09-08 Thread Uriel
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 3:47 AM, Kurt H Maierkarmaf...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Donald Allendonaldcal...@gmail.com wrote: Unless and until that happens, I want no part of this. can you maybe whine about uriel on livejournal or somewhere else that doesn't require me

Re: [dev] Talk about sane web browsers

2009-09-08 Thread Uriel
if this makes it more clear, it is 5am and I'm barely awake, ask if it is still confusing. Peace uriel -- Pinocchio

Re: [dev] slides with troff (was: Talk about sane web browsers)

2009-09-11 Thread Uriel
It supports UTF-8, that is all anyone sane should need. uriel On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 6:38 AM, Wu, Yue vano...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 02:35:20 +0800, markus schnalke mei...@marmaro.de wrote: [2009-09-09 04:59] Uriel lost.gob...@gmail.com Ok, I put this together in five min

Re: [dev] Conversation with Anselm R. Garbe of suckless.org

2009-09-14 Thread Uriel
replace clear thinking about what the real problem you are trying to solve is. uriel Hope that made some sense..

Re: [dev] Conversation with Anselm R. Garbe of suckless.org

2009-09-15 Thread Uriel
from OO and there is no other scapegoat to blame. Peace uriel On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 9:33 PM, markus schnalke mei...@marmaro.de wrote: [2009-09-13 23:34] Amit Uttamchandani atu13...@csun.edu Just curious as to the arguments against OO programming. All the classes I have taken in uni always

Re: [dev] Conversation with Anselm R. Garbe of suckless.org

2009-09-15 Thread Uriel
to it, Uriel!) Does anyone nowadays still remember the lessons of the structured programming paradigm that preceded OOD?  It's amazing how well the Unix approach exemplifies the structured design virtues of modularity, decoupling, cohesion, etc.  The OO stuff *tries* to achieve the same virtuosity

Re: [dev] Conversation with Anselm R. Garbe of suckless.org

2009-09-15 Thread Uriel
to it, Uriel!) Damn! ;) Another extremely obscure technique I'm sure nobody has heard of is using... *gasp* libraries! 9P and pipes have their places are great in many cases, but for low level stuff, it is hard to beat the function call. But libraries also need to follow the Unix principles of doing only

Re: [dev] Conversation with Anselm R. Garbe of suckless.org

2009-09-15 Thread Uriel
and cleverly hang themselves with them. Peace uriel

Re: [dev] [surf] is this available to download something with surf?

2009-09-16 Thread Uriel
If surf is going to ever be useful for anything it must include *by default* something like NoScript. uriel On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Anders Andersson pipat...@gmail.com wrote: You could stop using websites that obfuscates and breaks the web by covering up everything in javascript

Re: [dev] [surf] Toggle Flash

2009-09-17 Thread Uriel
What every browser should come with built in by default is something like NoScript. uriel On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 3:49 AM, joshua shaw shaw.j...@gmail.com wrote: I'm tired of flash everywhere.  Here's a patch with compile time option to disable plugins and keybindings to toggle plugins during

Re: [dev] Conversation with Anselm R. Garbe of suckless.org

2009-09-18 Thread Uriel
is great for some kinds of programs and some kinds of languages, but it is important to remember that type systems are a feature that has big complexity costs on the language and is not always worth it. uriel On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 8:54 AM, carmen _...@whats-your.name wrote: Also, I would like

Re: [dev] Conversation with Anselm R. Garbe of suckless.org

2009-09-18 Thread Uriel
to be the best way to make code easier to change later on! Peace uriel - but the extra work and the extra code costs you something. In my experience, focusing on good design is generally enough: it allows you to make the requested changes in an acceptable time. Also, I would like to know

Re: [dev][dwm] broken gnome (even after reset) after usage of dwm 4.7

2009-09-19 Thread Uriel
broken gnome is redundant. uriel On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Zhengning Jiang zhengto...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, since i started to use dwm 4.7 from time to time, i am having big problems with my gnome desktop. After about 1 - 2 minutes of usage (gnome ), freshly started apps loose

Re: [dev][dwm][OT] redundant thread; was broken gnome (even after reset) after usage of dwm 4.7

2009-09-20 Thread Uriel
Somebody thought breaking gnome was a problem rather than a feature, my comment was *not* universally redundant. Remember that suckless now seems to be full of people that think HTML is a good typesetting system. uriel On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 8:44 PM, sta...@cs.tu-berlin.de wrote: * Kris

Re: [dev] Suckless word processing solution?

2009-09-22 Thread Uriel
Can we setup a filter for dev@suckless.org that sends any html email to /dev/null, and autoreplies with Fuck off moron. to the author of any such email? Thanks uriel On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Anselm R Garbe ans...@garbe.us wrote: Hi Илья, 2009/9/22 Илья Илембитов ilembi...@yandex.ru

Re: [dev] Suckless word processing solution?

2009-09-22 Thread Uriel
will focus on cleaning up aftereffects of the gtk port. I hope that means he is porting it to Tk. uriel

Re: [dev] HTML Mail Rant Response

2009-09-22 Thread Uriel
is somehow acceptable. uriel In mutt, it is as easy as:  # Plain as default:  message-hook ~A 'alternative_order text/plain' There is a procmail recipe  out there that will strip html email out... Don On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Uriel lost.gob...@gmail.com wrote: Can we setup

Re: [dev] Suckless word processing solution?

2009-09-22 Thread Uriel
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:03 AM, Antoni Grzymala ant...@chopin.edu.pl wrote: Kurt H Maier dixit (2009-09-22, 16:54): On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Uriel lost.gob...@gmail.com wrote: I hope that means he is porting it to Tk. god knows I'm not in love with gtk, but Tk is a pretty big

Re: [dev] Question upgrading dwm

2009-09-23 Thread Uriel
Funny, I was using three monitors years before Xinerama was even invented, I wonder how was that possible? Tuomov is right on this one, Xinerama sucks: http://modeemi.fi/~tuomov/b/2008/the_downfall_of_x/ uriel On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 4:49 PM, miles groman miles.gro...@gmail.com wrote: Xinerama

Re: [dev] Thanks for your anwsers and how do you want your text editor ?

2009-09-24 Thread Uriel
. X sucks even more I think, creating documents should be separate from viewing documents. My vote goes for console. At least X is not based on emulating the behavior of hardware that was already obsolete forty years ago. uriel

Re: [dev] Suckless word processing solution?

2009-09-24 Thread Uriel
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Amit Uttamchandani atu13...@csun.edu wrote: On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:30:15AM +0200, Uriel wrote: People that bash Tk have never used it. Tk is shit, but compared to GTK, Qt and the rest, Tk at least is odorless and tasteless shit. uriel What bout FLTK

Re: [dev] Suckless word processing solution?

2009-09-29 Thread Uriel
Just FYI, p9p's troff does UTF-8 quite well too: http://plan9.us Peace uriel On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:00 PM, markus schnalke mei...@marmaro.de wrote: [2009-09-22 18:39] Илья Илембитов ilembi...@yandex.ru I am looking for a lightweight solution to create rich formatted content in any MS

Re: [dev] [ANN] wmii 3.9a2 released

2009-09-29 Thread Uriel
in a couple of commands). Keep up the good work uriel On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 6:33 AM, Kris Maglione maglion...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, wmii 3.9a2 is now available. Changes since 3.9a1:  * A few bugs have been fixed.  * wmii.pdf is now installed with wmii.  * There is no more magic involved

[dev] Suckless.org and Werc

2009-09-30 Thread Uriel
, werc 1.2.2 has been released including a fix for a bug reported by arg too, thanks! http://werc.cat-v.org/news/2009/09/23/werc-1.2.2/ Enjoy uriel

Re: [dev] [wmii] 3.9a1 hangs without p9p (same with 3.9a2)

2009-10-04 Thread Uriel
! uriel -- happily using p9p' sed(1) and the same sane regexps with all his tools. -- Kris Maglione For the time being, programming is a consumer job, assembly line coding is the norm, and what little exciting stuff is being performed is not going to make it compared to the mass-marketed crap

Re: [dev] Xinerama sucks

2009-10-16 Thread Uriel
If you think xinerama sucks, randr sucks even more. http://www.modeemi.fi/~tuomov/b/2008/the_downfall_of_x/ On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 7:04 PM, James PIC james...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Is there any dwm-like WM that supports multiple screens but uses randr instead of the Xinerama infamny? I think

Re: [dev] surf - add missing keybinding

2009-10-16 Thread Uriel
long without switching to the standard US kb layout (and that was over ten years ago). Btw, does surf support the standard Unix text editing keybindings[1]? uriel [1]: http://unix-kb.cat-v.org/ Thanks :) --pancake

Re: [dev] Xinerama sucks

2009-10-16 Thread Uriel
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 1:17 AM, Kris Maglione maglion...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 07:54:02PM +0200, Uriel wrote: If you think xinerama sucks, randr sucks even more. http://www.modeemi.fi/~tuomov/b/2008/the_downfall_of_x/ Tuomo is a crack pot. Perhaps, but what

Re: [dev] surf - add missing keybinding

2009-10-17 Thread Uriel
How many fucking times I have to explain that: Unix shortcuts are *NOT* Emacs shortcuts? God fucking heavens. uriel 2009/10/17 Tadeusz Sośnierz tadzi...@gmail.com: Btw, does surf support the standard Unix text editing keybindings[1]? Its not about surf, this is a task for gtk textentry

Re: [dev] surf - add missing keybinding

2009-10-17 Thread Uriel
modifications? I might be retarded, but I don't waste my life 'customizing' my fucking keyboard layout, I use the *standard* layout that works well for the task it is designed for: input text and code. Asking for apps to be changed because you use a braindead keyboard layout is just crazy. uriel

Re: [dev] surf - add missing keybinding

2009-10-17 Thread Uriel
I told them, they banned me from their irc server. They are beyond all hope. uriel On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 9:37 PM, Moritz Wilhelmy n0nse...@n0nsense.xinutec.org wrote: I think you should tell the GTK-people about this, not us. Regards On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 07:22:32PM +0200, Uriel wrote

Re: [dev] surf - add missing keybinding

2009-10-17 Thread Uriel
the misfortune of being forced to use any such app.) Thanks uriel -- Kris Maglione Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.        --Hanlon's razor

Re: [dev] (x)HTML-based office suite? (aka suckless word processing solution-2)

2009-10-18 Thread Uriel
to be some kind of sick prank or troll, I can't imagine any other explanation. I can't conceive any kind of torture painful enough for somebody proposing we use HTML to store any kind of valuable structured data, it is off the charts. uriel -- # Kurt H Maier

Re: [dev] (x)HTML-based office suite? (aka suckless word processing solution-2)

2009-10-18 Thread Uriel
than UTF-8 need to be lockedup and have the key thrown into a black hole, enough harm has been done already by retarded encodings. uriel

Re: [dev] surf - add missing keybinding

2009-10-18 Thread Uriel
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 3:58 AM, Kris Maglione maglion...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 03:08:22AM +0200, Uriel wrote: Hmmm... Just curious, but what exactly is possible now? I checked the attached file, but the relevant lines seemed to be the same that I had in: http://unix-kb.cat

Re: [dev] (x)HTML-based office suite? (aka suckless word processing solution-2)

2009-10-19 Thread Uriel
in some time. uriel P.S.: I recently converted werc from XHTML to HTML5, and it was clear improvement, much less verbose crap, much more clear and concise markup. On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 7:15 PM, Tor Aqissiaq toraqiss...@googlemail.com wrote: XHTML, parsed using an XML parser is very

Re: [dev] (x)HTML-based office suite? (aka suckless word processing solution-2)

2009-10-19 Thread Uriel
! uriel Kind regards, Anselm

Re: [dev] (x)HTML-based office suite? (aka suckless word processing solution-2)

2009-10-19 Thread Uriel
for word processing is irrelevant to any person that is not suffering from bovine spongiform encephalopathy uriel On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 6:44 PM, Anselm R Garbe ans...@garbe.us wrote: 2009/10/18 Tor Aqissiaq toraqiss...@googlemail.com: What is wrong with XHTML? Are you implying that HTML

Re: [dev] (x)HTML-based office suite? (aka suckless word processing solution-2)

2009-10-19 Thread Uriel
in English are not worth communicating with. uriel

Re: [dev] code.suckless.org is down?

2009-10-20 Thread Uriel
Then stop using fcgi, I use cgi for http://hg.cat-v.org and never had any problems. uriel On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Anselm R Garbe ans...@garbe.us wrote: Hi, that issue is fixed. The mercurial wsgi/fcgi server code seems to contain bugs, it seems to hang every 8-10 weeks, I

Re: [dev] [surf] next release

2009-10-21 Thread Uriel
Surf should *not* handle downloads or display source, this are clearly and obviously best handled by external tools and there is zero reason for them to be part of any browser. uriel On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Enno Boland (Gottox) got...@gmail.com wrote: Hi! I'm going to release 0.3

Re: [dev] UTF-8 copyright symbol

2009-10-22 Thread Uriel
obnoxious put it in a LICENSE file at the root of the project. That is what I do for all my code, it is short, simple, and works no matter how retarded the laws are in your country. uriel On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 9:40 PM, markus schnalke mei...@marmaro.de wrote: Dwm, surf, and probably more

Re: [dev] [surf] next release

2009-10-23 Thread Uriel
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Anselm R Garbe ans...@garbe.us wrote: 2009/10/21 Uriel lost.gob...@gmail.com: Surf should *not* handle downloads or display source, this are clearly and obviously best handled by external tools and there is zero reason for them to be part of any browser. I

Re: [dev] [surf] next release

2009-10-24 Thread Uriel
) resources. This is another reason why I still think building surf on top of the chromium infrastructure is a much better idea than using webkit directly. uriel On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Jessta jes...@gmail.com wrote: I quite like the idea of a http session manager, that holds session data

Re: [dev] [surf] next release

2009-10-25 Thread Uriel
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Charlie Kester corky1...@comcast.net wrote: On Sat 24 Oct 2009 at 12:35:36 PDT Uriel wrote: writing an http client that will handle all the crap out there is *really* hard Why is this the goal? Why, when I want to browse a sane website like suckless.org

Re: [dev] [st] goals / non-goals for st?

2009-10-29 Thread Uriel
screen, it will look just as pretty and be considerably less painful. uriel On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 6:23 AM, Ammar James lone.no...@gmail.com wrote: All you people who are against transparency are like all those BSD folk on Freenode who troll you for wanting a colorized ls output. Unbelievable.

Re: [dev] [st] goals / non-goals for st?

2009-10-30 Thread Uriel
a sane terminal should be able to simply and elegantly replace xmessage. (In Plan 9 rio windows are used to display text for example during the installer, a cool thing is that you can actually dynamically update the text in another window from a script.) uriel

Re: [dev] [st] goals / non-goals for st?

2009-10-30 Thread Uriel
existing programs, why don't you use the existing programs? Reading from stdin is a basic and fundamental Unix design, and should be applied where it makes sense, I think it makes quite a bit of sense here. uriel

Re: [dev] [st] goals / non-goals for st?

2009-10-30 Thread Uriel
, it's still a terminal emulator. That the concept of 'pty' still exists in the year 2009 is quite fucking amazing. I'm surprised we don't carry punchcards around anymore. uriel

Re: [dev] [st] goals / non-goals for st?

2009-10-30 Thread Uriel
of this discussion it really makes me wonder why I'm still subscribed to this mailing list. There is no law that requires you to read every post sent to a maling list. Also, I'm sure no matter how retarded your mail client is, it has a delete function. uriel

Re: [dev] JOE editor was: a little bit of vi+zsh magic

2009-11-04 Thread Uriel
disclaimers, all Java software should include the following warranty: http://marvin.cat-v.org/warranty uriel Jack J. Woehr            # «'I know what it means well enough, when I find http://www.well.com/~jax # a thing,' said the Duck: 'it's generally a frog or http://www.softwoehr.com

Re: [dev] Re: a little bit of vi+zsh magic

2009-11-05 Thread Uriel
editing files over slow connections. As much as I hate curses, I think the idea of having a curses interface for the sam protocol would be interesting and perhaps even useful, sam -d is a bit 'hardcore', and sadly rio terminals are not as prevalent as one would like... uriel -- Kris Maglione Plenty

Re: [dev] dmc news

2009-11-09 Thread Uriel
for a suckless project. uriel I don't plan to write a ncurses frontend at the moment, but shouldn't be hard to do. (yeah I suck ;) but the gtk gui will be keyboard friendly. I'm not sure how it will work with large email boxes, but the mails can be automatically tagged to get reduced views of the whole

Re: [dev][ot]quote - suck less philosophy

2009-11-13 Thread Uriel
That quote has been at http://quotes.cat-v.org/ for a long time (it used to be in http://quotes.cat-v.org/programming/ but it is universal enough that i put it with the other non-programming quotes). This also relates to one of the most famous StrunkWhite rules. uriel On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10

Re: [dev] [OT]: Go programming language

2009-11-14 Thread Uriel
has two quite independent implementations in good shape, can't say the same of C++ (where all implementations suck, by design). uriel but I wouldn't mind trying it out to see what it's like.

Re: [dev] [OT]: Go programming language

2009-11-14 Thread Uriel
garbage collector), rob said he would like somebody to try building a kernel in Go, this would be fun, and might even produce something quite useful. Enjoy, and if you care about the sanity of the software industry, learn to love Go. uriel P.S.: And I found a bunch of people that are not going

  1   2   3   >