You forgot the '-e' argument in surf.
> tabbed surf -e
On 9/28/19, Jason Smith wrote:
> Here is my config.mk, compilation output and the behavior I get when I
> execute tabbed as a screenshot.
>
> I've been using Openbox for several years. Is it worth switching to dwm?
I have been using dwm since version 4 (like 12 years or so, I don't remember).
Tiling window managers in general are good if you a heavy user of the
console and your other applications are a web browser or a pdf reader.
- The awk language
- Software Tools in Pascal, Kernighan and Plauger (I think there is
a version of this book in C, isn't it?)
I have both of them.
The first version of Software Tools is written in ratfor which is
almost a C dialect but doesn't support recursion and structures. None
the
Project Oberon (New Edition 2013):
http://www.inf.ethz.ch/personal/wirth/ProjectOberon/
The little schemer is a cute fun book which is more about recursion
and abstraction than Lisp.
Smalltalk-80: The Language and its Implementation
You don't need to use the include statement.
cat config.mk Makefile | make -f -
pmarin.
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Nick suckless-...@njw.me.uk wrote:
I was reading the opengroup specifications for make(1) recently[0],
and found that even our standard makefile practise of using 'include
dash has a broken builtin echo command and they are not interested in
fix it. I think busybox ash fixed the problem.
dash echo '\tshit'
shit
ash echo '\tshit'
\tshit
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 11:32 PM, Christian Neukirchen
chneukirc...@gmail.com wrote:
Markus Teich markus.te...@stusta.mhn.de
Obviously C. Also you have to love Xlib, GTK+ and vintage console terminals.
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 2:58 AM, Alex Hutton highspeed...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 November 2012 03:00, Christoph Lohmann 2...@r-36.net wrote:
b...but I though Go was suckless? ;_;
No. There was only one person
I am using dwm 6.0.
When I have the focus on a xterm and I try to resize the window a gap
appears between the master window and the others.
screenshot: http://i.imgur.com/rAUfL.png
Until now I have used dwm 4.5 and I never had this problem.
Cheers.
pmarin.
Why are we still emulating a 32 years old terminal?
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 2:06 AM, Kurt H Maier khm-suckl...@intma.in wrote:
On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 01:18:10AM +0100, Aurélien Aptel wrote:
Actually, st does not implement every VT100/VT102/xterm escape sequence.
Apparently Bjartur does not
I have to confess that lately I am enjoying reading the Bratko's Prolog book.
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 8:00 PM, hiro 23h...@googlemail.com wrote:
The future is blablabla
This doesn't really matter for us individuals, generally.
My programming language is SMTP
Hi all.
Im trying to create static linked executables for dwm and demu but Im
still having problems.
I have followed this post[1] but Im having the following errors (with dwm)[2].
Have someone had better luck? How is the confing.mk?
Im using Ubuntu 8.04 with dwm-5.9
[1]
Any advantage over unclutter?
Does it work with dosbox and qemu?
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Ricardo Catalinas Jiménez
jimenezr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
In case someone is interested, I wrote this little utility in C:
https://github.com/jimenezrick/hidcur
It hides the mouse cursor
Linux ≠ suckless
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Sir Cyrus sircy...@gmail.com wrote:
What's the most suckless Linux distribution?
Have anyone tried it?
http://www.etalabs.net/musl/
Well It is just a patch not the atrocity done in dmenu by surf users.
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Claudio M. Alessi smo...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems like useless rather than suckless.
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 7:58 PM, David DEMELIER
demelier.da...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I was surprised to see that a java window does not update its content,
in fact nothing changes. If you resize the window nothing happens and
the usual behavior is that the window updates its content to the
I mean glibc
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 1:40 PM, pmarin pacog...@gmail.com wrote:
I think p9p libc is a big wrapper around glib. There is no plan9 libc
for unix (only some stuff that comes with go but It can not be used
with an ansi c compiler).
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Jens Staal
*should be used* and *can be used* have different meaning in my poor English.
Can you rationalize why Scheme *should be used *?
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 7:09 AM, Robert Ransom rransom.8...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 16:00:44 +0200
Alexander Teinum atei...@gmail.com wrote:
Use
Problem is the vast complexity they both contain is hidden inside
libwebkit. That thing is huge. I get the feeling surf and uzbl only
make the tip of the iceberg suck less.
We would can say the same about dwm, X11 and xinerama.
pmarin.
In Linux I use two scripts. I store the passwords in two plain files:
wep:
#! /bin/sh
key=`grep $1 /home/pmarin/wep | cut -d' ' -f2`
sudo ifconfig wlan0 up
sudo iwconfig wlan0 essid $1
sudo iwconfig wlan0 key $key
sudo dhclient wlan0
wpa:
#! /bin/sh
sudo ifconfig wlan0 up
sudo iwconfig wlan0
mtime.1 is fsize.1
getflags.1 is getflags.8
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 11:32 AM, mikey abc.mi...@googlemail.com wrote:
Dunno if this helps?
http://man.cat-v.org/plan_9/1/mtime
http://man.cat-v.org/plan_9/8/getflags
On 27/04/2010, Anselm R Garbe ans...@garbe.us wrote:
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at
with the environment variable LINES. My xterm
actualizes this variable each time the window is resized but It seems
that vi is faster (it uses SIGWINCH).
Cheers.
pmarin
Static linking + Linux + BSD userland == Mastodon Linux?
http://www.mastodon.biz/
It is a lot outdated.
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 8:16 PM, finkler fink...@officinamentis.org wrote:
On 04/15/10 08:39, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
android isn't POSIX compliant and is probably more wide spread now
...@hsh.name wrote:
I'm using vim and he resizing after i resize urxvt.
Try press ctrl+l - this combination redraw console, i often use it to
redraw stupied mc.
On 4/17/10, pmarin pacog...@gmail.com wrote:
This is not the problem. When I start vi in a xterm (or any terminal)
vi use all the size
= win.ws_col;
TLINES = winsz.ws_row = win.ws_row;
i = TLINES;
l = TLINES;
options[WINDOW].ovalue = options[WINDOW].odefault = l - 1;
options[SCROLL].ovalue = options[SCROLL].odefault = HC ? 11 : ((l-1) /
}
#ifdef stuff is harmful.
Cheers.
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 12:20 PM, pmarin
Comment the lines that begin with REINC, RELIB and RETGT in the Makefile
Aha, yes. That works. So no unicode support for me then, judging by
the comment in the Makefile.
No, you should have unicode support if you have LC_CTYPE. This lines
removes some extended regular expresions.
Hi all.
I am using the traditional vi and it doesn't resize in the xterm so
I wonder if someone have it working properly. I have looked at the
source code and It is using a signal for SIGWINCH (the function
onwinch in ex_v.c) but nothing happends.
Cheers.
pmarin
: The original ex/vi text editor.
That works fine with my xterm, maybe you've got some strange Xdefaults?
On 16 April 2010 19:29, pmarin pacog...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all.
I am using the traditional vi and it doesn't resize in the xterm so
I wonder if someone have it working properly. I have looked
What kind of strange Xdefaults?
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 8:53 PM, pmarin pacog...@gmail.com wrote:
The One True Vi: http://ex-vi.sourceforge.net/
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Rob robpill...@gmail.com wrote:
Which version do you mean by original vi?
$ pacman -Qi vi
Name : vi
This is not the problem. When I start vi in a xterm (or any terminal)
vi use all the size but if I resize the xterm (dynamic or tiled), vi
maintains the old size and the screen become a mess when I edit text.
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Christoph Schied
christoph.sch...@uni-ulm.de wrote:
at 11:37 PM, Michael P. Soulier
msoul...@digitaltorque.ca wrote:
On 16/04/10 pmarin said:
The One True Vi: http://ex-vi.sourceforge.net/
I'm curious. I remember using vanilla Vi, and I found it unsufficient for my
work until I found Vim. Why would one prefer vanilla Vi?
Mike
Michael
I need the Lisp mode.
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:35 PM, Jakub Lach jakub_l...@mailplus.pl wrote:
Dnia 16 kwietnia 2010 22:23 julien.steinhau...@orange.fr napisał(a):
Hello,
I know it isn't the right solution but haven't your shell
a shortcut to redraw the screen until you find a better fix
Hi all.
Anyone know how to know the size (kb) of a process in Linux?
using the proc filesystem I can know the number of pages that it uses
(/proc/pid/statm). How I can convert
it to kb? Any posix way?
pmarin
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 6:32 AM, Uriel lost.gob...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Dmitry Maluka dmitrymal...@gmail.com
wrote:
You don't need to replace something that is useless and evil, as Go
shows. Just like Plan 9 didn't replace root and suid (or at least
not
Xubuntu with a large /usr/local/*
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Ryan Ritwont...@gmail.com wrote:
Gentoo 3
On 7/24/09, Jacob Todd jaketodd...@gmail.com wrote:
Funtoo.
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 02:09:58PM +0900, Alex Matviychuk wrote:
I've been following the list for a while and I'm curious
Why not to maintain dwm list and redirect its content to dev list?
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Benjamin Conner tommydabo...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to know this too. I would only like dwm ones like the lists used
to be.
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 4:44 AM, Dusan ef_...@yahoo.com wrote:
?
That's a great idea!
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 8:19 AM, pmarin pacog...@gmail.com
wrote:
Why not to maintain dwm list and redirect its content to dev
list?
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Benjamin Conner
tommydabo...@gmail.com wrote
38 matches
Mail list logo
