On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 3:00 AM Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> I pushed line-break-detection[0][1] just yesterday. The functions
>
> size_t grapheme_next_line_break(const uint_least32_t *, size_t);
>
> and
>
> size_t grapheme_next_line_break_utf8(const char *, size_t);
>
> should be just
On Tue, 31 May 2022 08:35:11 -0400
LM wrote:
Dear LM,
> On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 11:33 AM Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> > What functions do you need in the context of Tuxmath?
>
> From what I remember, it just needs to figure out where to do a clean
> break for text wrapping with internationalized
On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 11:33 AM Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> What functions do you need in the context of Tuxmath?
>From what I remember, it just needs to figure out where to do a clean
break for text wrapping with internationalized strings. Don't believe
it uses the other features of libunistring.
On Mon, 30 May 2022 07:33:24 -0400
LM wrote:
Dear LM,
> Thanks for the reviews. That's really helpful to know. As mentioned,
> I haven't tried them myself.
you're welcome!
> That looks really useful. I noticed the break testing in libgrapheme.
> Is it possible to use this as a replacement
On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 4:56 AM Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> having dove deep into UTF-8 and Unicode, I can at least say that
> libutf8proc has an unsafe UTF-8-decoder, as it doesn't catch overlong
> encodings. There are also multiple other pitfalls.
Thanks for the reviews. That's really helpful to
On Sun, 29 May 2022 13:48:49 -0400
LM wrote:
Dear LM,
> I like that point. Not a fan of glib and I try to avoid software
> that uses it.
>
> Don't know how good they are, but I've run across several lighter
> utf-8 C libraries:
> https://github.com/cls/libutf
>
On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 12:34 PM Kyryl Melekhin wrote:
> Cool, but why use Glib? You can come up with some random utf-8 character
> generator function, it's pretty trivial and there are plently of examples
> in many suckless programs on how to do utf-8 validation.
I like that point. Not a fan
Hello Ryan,
Ryan Raymond wrote:
> Hello all. I'm working on a suckless cmatrix clone.
> It's not done yet, and it still suffers from constant memory leakage, but
> I'm having fun working on it.
> It already shows 50% reduced cpu/ram usage vs cmatrix, despite greatly
> improved fps.
Hi Ryan,
On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 03:04:00AM -0400, Ryan Raymond wrote:
> Hello all. I'm working on a suckless cmatrix clone.
> It's not done yet, and it still suffers from constant memory leakage, but
> I'm having fun working on it.
> It already shows 50% reduced cpu/ram usage vs cmatrix, despite
