On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 09:07:03PM -0500, Kurt H Maier wrote:
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 12:58:09PM +1100, Alex Hutton wrote:
Which languages qualify as suckless?
Loglan for new development, English for legacy support.
Loglan is way to over-engineered and bloated.
toki pona to the rescue!
On 06/11/2012, Alex Hutton highspeed...@gmail.com wrote:
Which languages qualify as suckless?
Only Unicode-extended Lazy K.
λ is for wimps.
On 07/11/2012, Joerg Zinke m...@umaxx.net wrote:
Loglan is way to over-engineered and bloated.
toki pona to the rescue!
Training your mind to think in Toki Pona can lead to many deeper
insights about yourself or the world around you. [1]
Well, it can lead to many shallow insights about its
Which languages qualify as suckless?
C, body language.
On 07/11/2012, hiro 23h...@gmail.com wrote:
Which languages qualify as suckless?
C, body language.
body
Language
/body
Hello everyone,
Yesterday, out of frustration and boredom, I started a minimalistic
implementation of tar in Go which I named rat ('tar' reversed, but also
'ridiculously abysmal tar'). Today, I reached a point where I can show that
piece of software to you.
It currently supports the tar
On 2012-11-06, at 12:00, Andreas Krennmair wrote:
It currently supports the tar operations c, t and x (which makes it a bit
more useful than sltar) and the options -f, -C, -v, -z and -j (for
decompression only).
Cool. Did you consider auto detecting compression from file name and/or
Greetings.
On Tue, 06 Nov 2012 16:10:33 +0100 Andreas Krennmair a...@synflood.at wrote:
Hello everyone,
Yesterday, out of frustration and boredom, I started a minimalistic
implementation of tar in Go which I named rat ('tar' reversed, but also
'ridiculously abysmal tar'). Today, I reached
* Christoph Lohmann 2...@r-36.net [2012-11-06 16:20]:
On Tue, 06 Nov 2012 16:10:33 +0100 Andreas Krennmair a...@synflood.at wrote:
Hello everyone,
Yesterday, out of frustration and boredom, I started a minimalistic
implementation of tar in Go which I named rat ('tar' reversed, but also
Greetings.
On Tue, 06 Nov 2012 17:00:06 +0100 Andreas Krennmair a...@synflood.at wrote:
* Christoph Lohmann 2...@r-36.net [2012-11-06 16:20]:
On Tue, 06 Nov 2012 16:10:33 +0100 Andreas Krennmair a...@synflood.at
wrote:
Hello everyone,
Yesterday, out of frustration and boredom, I started
On 6 November 2012 11:00, Christoph Lohmann 2...@r-36.net wrote:
Greetings.
On Tue, 06 Nov 2012 17:00:06 +0100 Andreas Krennmair a...@synflood.at
wrote:
* Christoph Lohmann 2...@r-36.net [2012-11-06 16:20]:
On Tue, 06 Nov 2012 16:10:33 +0100 Andreas Krennmair a...@synflood.at
wrote:
On 7 November 2012 03:00, Christoph Lohmann 2...@r-36.net wrote:
b...but I though Go was suckless? ;_;
No. There was only one person pretending go to be suckless because of
its pseudo Plan 9 heritage.
Which languages qualify as suckless?
Cheers,
Alex
On 7 November 2012 09:58, Alex Hutton highspeed...@gmail.com wrote:
Which languages qualify as suckless?
Have you not noticed http://hg.suckless.org/ ?
C++ Java.
On Nov 7, 2012 2:58 AM, Alex Hutton highspeed...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 November 2012 03:00, Christoph Lohmann 2...@r-36.net wrote:
b...but I though Go was suckless? ;_;
No. There was only one person pretending go to be suckless because of
its pseudo Plan 9 heritage.
Which languages qualify as suckless?
Only Brainfuck. Anything more is superfluous.
Obviously C. Also you have to love Xlib, GTK+ and vintage console terminals.
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 2:58 AM, Alex Hutton highspeed...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 November 2012 03:00, Christoph Lohmann 2...@r-36.net wrote:
b...but I though Go was suckless? ;_;
No. There was only one person
16 matches
Mail list logo
