Re: [dev] [slock] Linux-PAM support

2010-11-20 Thread Džen
Epic :D On 16/11/10 12:17pm, Uriel wrote: On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:09 PM, pancake panc...@youterm.com wrote: On 11/16/10 11:46, Petr Sabata wrote: Hey, this patch should enable Linux-PAM support in slock. It's my first try with Linux-PAM whatsoever so there's a chance it won't

[dev] [slock] Linux-PAM support

2010-11-16 Thread Petr Sabata
Hey, this patch should enable Linux-PAM support in slock. It's my first try with Linux-PAM whatsoever so there's a chance it won't work everywhere :) Maybe it could be useful to some... -- Petr 'contyk' Sabata, Red Hat, Brno () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\

Re: [dev] [slock] Linux-PAM support

2010-11-16 Thread pancake
On 11/16/10 11:46, Petr Sabata wrote: Hey, this patch should enable Linux-PAM support in slock. It's my first try with Linux-PAM whatsoever so there's a chance it won't work everywhere :) Maybe it could be useful to some... few time ago i send a patch adding support for user defined password,

Re: [dev] [slock] Linux-PAM support

2010-11-16 Thread Uriel
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:09 PM, pancake panc...@youterm.com wrote: On 11/16/10 11:46, Petr Sabata wrote: Hey, this patch should enable Linux-PAM support in slock. It's my first try with Linux-PAM whatsoever so there's a chance it won't work everywhere :) Maybe it could be useful to

Re: [dev] [slock] Linux-PAM support

2010-11-16 Thread Petr Sabata
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:09:54PM +0100, pancake wrote: On 11/16/10 11:46, Petr Sabata wrote: Hey, this patch should enable Linux-PAM support in slock. It's my first try with Linux-PAM whatsoever so there's a chance it won't work everywhere :) Maybe it could be useful to some... few

Re: [dev] [slock] Linux-PAM support

2010-11-16 Thread pancake
On 11/16/10 13:00, Petr Sabata wrote: On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:09:54PM +0100, pancake wrote: On 11/16/10 11:46, Petr Sabata wrote: Hey, this patch should enable Linux-PAM support in slock. It's my first try with Linux-PAM whatsoever so there's a chance it won't work everywhere :) Maybe it

Re: [dev] [slock] Linux-PAM support

2010-11-16 Thread Kurt H Maier
the slackware people peat on policykit unitl it worked without pam, why are we moving the other direction -- # Kurt H Maier

Re: [dev] [slock] Linux-PAM support

2010-11-16 Thread Uriel
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Kurt H Maier karmaf...@gmail.com wrote: the slackware people peat on policykit unitl it worked without pam, why are we moving the other direction Because I suspect 'suckless' should be renamed 'suckass'. The amount of totally retarded evil shit that gets

Re: [dev] [slock] Linux-PAM support

2010-11-16 Thread Kurt H Maier
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Uriel ur...@berlinblue.org wrote: And Glenda bless Slackware and OpenBSD from standing against the idiotic insanity that is PAM. For the record, OpenBSD looked at Slackware's solution and ported it to bsd_auth. it can't possibly be that hard to adapt slock to

Re: [dev] [slock] Linux-PAM support

2010-11-16 Thread Connor Lane Smith
Hey, On 16 November 2010 17:33, Kurt H Maier karmaf...@gmail.com wrote: and I hope to god people one day stop cramming 'features' into simple software.  I'm talking to you, dmenu If someone has a use case for something it makes sense to make a patch. One of the benefits of our simple software

Re: [dev] [slock] Linux-PAM support

2010-11-16 Thread Marvin Vek
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:33:00PM -0500, Kurt H Maier wrote: slock was written for people who don't need to log in with a goddamn retinal scanner, and I hope to god people one day stop cramming 'features' into simple software. I'm talking to you, dmenu Oh, finally, for the last couple of