Re: [dev] [st] Add a newline to the string printed in die

2012-12-13 Thread Joerg Zinke
Am 11.12.2012 um 12:38 schrieb Marc Andre Tanner m...@brain-dump.org: Please send patches as attached files. Since we are using now git, it is easier and logic send the patches in this way, so the code of the patch can be included and modified in replies. You only have to use git am if you

Re: [dev] [st] Add a newline to the string printed in die

2012-12-13 Thread Joerg Zinke
Am 11.12.2012 um 18:34 schrieb Christoph Lohmann 2...@r-36.net: I don’t know why people prefer to see the big patches inline, Ideally the patches are small :) so you have the scroll past the whole patch to the next e‐mail, when you are So, scrolling is a problem for you? I do

[dev] [st] Add a newline to the string printed in die

2012-12-11 Thread Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
After a call to die the program exits and the shell take the control, so it is better for the user the shell begins in an new line, and it is better for the programmer don't have to explicitly add it in each call to die. --- st.c | 45 +++-- 1 file

Re: [dev] [st] Add a newline to the string printed in die

2012-12-11 Thread Christoph Lohmann
Greetings. On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 09:40:16 +0100 Roberto E. Vargas Caballero k...@shike2.com wrote: After a call to die the program exits and the shell take the control, so it is better for the user the shell begins in an new line, and it is better for the programmer don't have to explicitly add

Re: [dev] [st] Add a newline to the string printed in die

2012-12-11 Thread Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
No, this will change the die() behaviour between all suckless projects. Then, change die in all the projects, it is the usual way of working with other issues, no? Please send patches as attached files. Since we are using now git, it is easier and logic send the patches in this way, so the

Re: [dev] [st] Add a newline to the string printed in die

2012-12-11 Thread Christoph Lohmann
Greetings. On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 10:39:55 +0100 Roberto E. Vargas Caballero k...@shike2.com wrote: No, this will change the die() behaviour between all suckless projects. Then, change die in all the projects, it is the usual way of working with other issues, no? Why should your taste

Re: [dev] [st] Add a newline to the string printed in die

2012-12-11 Thread Marc Andre Tanner
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:39:55AM +0100, Christoph Lohmann wrote: Please send patches as attached files. Since we are using now git, it is easier and logic send the patches in this way, so the code of the patch can be included and modified in replies. You only have to use git am if

Re: [dev] [st] Add a newline to the string printed in die

2012-12-11 Thread Christoph Lohmann
Greetings. On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:25:04 +0100 Marc Andre Tanner m...@brain-dump.org wrote: On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:39:55AM +0100, Christoph Lohmann wrote: Please send patches as attached files. Since we are using now git, it is easier and logic send the patches in this way,

Re: [dev] [st] Add a newline to the string printed in die

2012-12-11 Thread Antonio Quartulli
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 06:25:04PM +0100, Christoph Lohmann wrote: Greetings. On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:25:04 +0100 Marc Andre Tanner m...@brain-dump.org wrote: On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:39:55AM +0100, Christoph Lohmann wrote: Please send patches as attached files. Since we are

Re: [dev] [st] Add a newline to the string printed in die

2012-12-11 Thread Christoph Lohmann
Greetings. On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:34:19 +0100 Antonio Quartulli or...@autistici.org wrote: On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 06:25:04PM +0100, Christoph Lohmann wrote: Greetings. On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:25:04 +0100 Marc Andre Tanner m...@brain-dump.org wrote: On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at

Re: [dev] [st] Add a newline to the string printed in die

2012-12-11 Thread Anselm R Garbe
On 11 December 2012 18:33, Antonio Quartulli or...@autistici.org wrote: On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 06:25:04PM +0100, Christoph Lohmann wrote: On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:25:04 +0100 Marc Andre Tanner m...@brain-dump.org wrote: On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:39:55AM +0100, Christoph Lohmann wrote: