On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Nicolai Waniek roc...@rochus.net wrote:
On 05/10/2011 04:57 PM, Christophe-Marie Duquesne wrote:
Good code is supposed to be readable, and should need no
UML diagram (and probably very few comments).
Though you're right that it should not _need_ a UML
I am
saying if your code needs UML documentation to be understood, then it
is not suckless.
I fully agree.
Also, I tend to dislike auto-generated documentation because the
valuable part is very small and hidden among loads of crap.
That depends on the tool you (have to) use. As an
On 05/12/2011 03:51 PM, Nicolai Waniek wrote:
I still have to find any sane mathematical notation for parallelism in
programming languages though...
Of course CSP goes in this direction, but as soon as your language is
not based on CSP in any way, you yet again have to document describing
the
On Thu, 12 May 2011 15:57:13 +0200, Nicolai Waniek wrote:
On 05/12/2011 03:51 PM, Nicolai Waniek wrote:
I still have to find any sane mathematical notation for parallelism
in
programming languages though...
Of course CSP goes in this direction, but as soon as your language is
not based on
So much retarded crap in this thread, it is hard to know where to start.
Fortunately somebody already has done some writing on the topic:
http://archive.eiffel.com/doc/manuals/technology/bmarticles/uml/page.html
UML makes CORBA and C++ look like sane, productive and useful
technologies by
* Uriel ur...@berlinblue.org [2011-05-12 19:54:26 +0200]:
Fortunately somebody already has done some writing on the topic:
http://archive.eiffel.com/doc/manuals/technology/bmarticles/uml/page.html
it is also worth noting that even original contributors of uml
find it problematic
On 05/10/2011 04:57 PM, Christophe-Marie Duquesne wrote:
Good code is supposed to be readable, and should need no
UML diagram (and probably very few comments).
Though you're right that it should not _need_ a UML diagram, having one
isn't that bad either. This is especially true when you're not
Hi all,
Today, an UML lesson have been given in my university. We used the
software DIA to build our diagram. I've made some research on Internet for an
UML suckless software, but didn't success.
Could you give me some suckless softwares name to work with UML ?
I was thinking about a
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 04:50:01PM +0200, timow+...@diningphilosopher.de wrote:
On 2011-05-10, CHABOT Simon wrote:
Could you give me some suckless softwares name to work with UML ?
honestly i'm surprised by this lack of reaction to UML + suckless in
the same sentence. Usually this mailing list
Le mardi 10 mai 2011 à 04:50:01, timow+...@diningphilosopher.de a écrit :
The best solutions I could find was UMLGraph (http://www.umlgraph.org/)
and MetaUML (http://metauml.sourceforge.net/old/index.html).
MetaUML looks great, thanks !
--
CHABOT Simon
Université de Technologie de Compiègne
On 10 May 2011 17:01, Mate Nagy mn...@port70.net wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 04:50:01PM +0200, timow+...@diningphilosopher.de
wrote:
On 2011-05-10, CHABOT Simon wrote:
Could you give me some suckless softwares name to work with UML ?
honestly i'm surprised by this lack of reaction to
11 matches
Mail list logo
