[2010-08-03 16:30] Joe joebsulli...@gmail.com
[08/03/10] @11:28AM PDT, mei...@marmaro.de wrote:
[2010-08-03 10:14] Joe joebsulli...@gmail.com
NAME
ed - text editor
SYNOPSIS
ed [-] [-sx] [-p string] [file]
It should be: ed [-] [file]
I concur. fwd:
Luxuries like syntax coloring would be nice but really not critical.
Would you like reading a book with all adjectives bolded and
nouns italicized?
You may want to take a look at ALGOL 68.
I hadn't thought of it like that before. Good point.
Excuse me while I also remove indentation from my
On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 00:20:39 -0700
Wolf Tivy wti...@my.bcit.ca wrote:
Excuse me while I also remove indentation from my my code.
Would you indent your prose?
http://google.com/search?q=sense-lining
Robert Ransom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
: Monday, August 2, 2010 5:30 pm
Subject: Re: [dev] curses samterm
To: dev@suckless.org
Under what circumstance would you not be able to run sam's gui
and have
to resort to a curses interface? sam already provides a way to
connect
the gui to a remote host via ssh to edit files over a slow
connection
Fortune worthy:
X doesn't break that often for me.
--Joseph Xu, 8/3/10
-
From: Joseph Xu joseph...@gmail.com
Date: Monday, August 2, 2010 5:30 pm
Subject: Re: [dev] curses samterm
To: dev@suckless.org
Under what circumstance would you not be able to run sam's gui
and have
to resort to a curses interface? sam already provides a way to
connect
the gui
On Tue, 3 Aug 2010 12:01:24 +0200
Uriel ur...@berlinblue.org wrote:
Anyone that considers for even one second to use nano should be taken
out and shot on the spot.
It's not so bad if you build it with the --disable-wrapping-as-root
configure option and only use it as root.
In case you're
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Robert Ransom rransom.8...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 3 Aug 2010 12:01:24 +0200
Uriel ur...@berlinblue.org wrote:
Anyone that considers for even one second to use nano should be taken
out and shot on the spot.
It's not so bad if you build it with the
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 12:20:39AM -0700, Wolf Tivy wrote:
I hadn't thought of it like that before. Good point.
Excuse me while I also remove indentation from my my code.
Would you indent your prose? What nonsense have
I been practicing?
I do indent my prose, by using paragraphs.
Thanks.
Hey,
On 3 August 2010 09:50, Joseph Xu joseph...@gmail.com wrote:
Very few people use sam to begin with, even fewer would like the curses
interface. I'm guessing no more than 20 people.
The best reason not to write a program ever: nobody is using it yet.
Usually I'll have acme always running
Hey,
On 3 August 2010 17:43, Joseph Xu joseph...@gmail.com wrote:
I said I'm guessing no more than 20 people will find it useful if it was
written.
I think in this case samterm is more important than sam itself when it
comes to attracting users. Few will convert to using sam if it is ugly
and
Yes, indeed. Both acme and samterm ship with their very own window
manager, so you can fullscreen acme in rio and pretend you're using
wmii. And samterm is even worse: a stacking window manager
within a
stacking window manager (so you can stack while you stack).
There is a good reason why
[2010-08-03 10:14] Joe joebsulli...@gmail.com
ED(1)ED(1)
NAME
ed - text editor
SYNOPSIS
ed [-] [-sx] [-p string] [file]
It should be: ed [-] [file]
meillo
ED(1)
ED(1)
NAME
ed - text editor
SYNOPSIS
ed [-] [-sx] [-p string] [file]
DESCRIPTION
ed is a line-oriented text editor. It is used to create, display,
mod-
ify and otherwise manipulate text files.
WARNING
Everyone involved in the development of
So on that note, it looks like curses is the way to go (as has been
previously suggested). Then the issue is how closely our curses
samterm would resemble bitmap samterm. Considering all the clicky
menus and scrollbars and such, it may be best for the curses interface
to be a totally
[08/03/10] @11:28AM PDT, mei...@marmaro.de wrote:
[2010-08-03 10:14] Joe joebsulli...@gmail.com
NAME
ed - text editor
SYNOPSIS
ed [-] [-sx] [-p string] [file]
It should be: ed [-] [file]
I concur. fwd: sj...@apple.com.
My only other choice is 9 man ed:
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 04:29:34PM -0700, Wolf Tivy wrote:
My current idea is just to have the screen displaying the file (where?)
with dot highlighted. A few lines at the bottom would have
the command line, maybe it would dynamically adjust for multiline
commands, I dunno. You could cursor
Sounds like vi.
except with a clean command set and less legacy baggage.
I noticed there is a project for a samterm on the project ideas page.
Has anyone started on this? It seems like a really good idea.
I guess ideally it would be usable without X (in text mode) but would
still keep the nice view and selection interface.
Luxuries like syntax coloring would be nice
Under what circumstance would you not be able to run sam's gui and have
to resort to a curses interface? sam already provides a way to connect
the gui to a remote host via ssh to edit files over a slow connection.
I've even done this with an old Windows port of sam running locally and
a remote
On 8/2/2010 6:15 PM, Wolf Tivy wrote:
I noticed there is a project for a samterm on the project ideas page.
Has anyone started on this? It seems like a really good idea.
I guess ideally it would be usable without X (in text mode) but would
still keep the nice view and selection interface.
, 2010 5:30 pm
Subject: Re: [dev] curses samterm
To: dev@suckless.org
Under what circumstance would you not be able to run sam's gui
and have
to resort to a curses interface? sam already provides a way to
connect
the gui to a remote host via ssh to edit files over a slow
connection
22 matches
Mail list logo
