Re: [VOTE] [SIP-26] Proposal for Implementing Connection Pooling for Analytics Database Connections

+1 binding - Craig > On Feb 17, 2020, at 9:46 PM, Grace Guo wrote: > > +1 binding > > - Grace > >> On Feb 14, 2020, at 2:41 PM, Maxime Beauchemin >> wrote: >> >> Superset Community, >> >> This is a call to vote for SIP-26 Proposal for Implementing Connection >> Pooling for Analytics Data

Re: Presto, Superset and Kerberos

Hey Luca and Maxime, we will be reviving the repo, however we would need to rely on the community for the contribution & testing. Happy to review & merge diffs & support the work for the new library release. Another quick thing, it is possible to do pip install from the github repository, that may

Re: Presto, Superset and Kerberos

Hi Bogdan, thanks a lot for the help, it is a great news! Totally ok with what you said about relying on the community, I think it is something that we all agree on. The problem was that nobody reviewed or merged patches :) I would concentrate, if possible, in releasing 0.6.2 with the Kerberos su

Re: [VOTE] [SIP-26] Proposal for Implementing Connection Pooling for Analytics Database Connections

-1 (non binding) It appears that this SIP did not have a [DISCUSS] email sent to the dev list (see mailing list history here: https://lists.apache.org/list.html?d...@superset.apache.org:lte=1y:SIP-26), so I'm concerned that everyone who wanted to provide feedback didn't get a chance. Could we make

Re: [VOTE] [SIP-26] Proposal for Implementing Connection Pooling for Analytics Database Connections

That’s fine. I’ve had issues with emails not going through to the list - the [DISCUSS] message appears to have been one that didn’t make it. Let’s consider this the discussion thread then and we’ll re-trigger in a few days. Will Barrett Staff Software Engineer Preset, Inc. | https://preset.io On

RE: Re: [VOTE] [SIP-26] Proposal for Implementing Connection Pooling for Analytics Database Connections

It seems that discussion also occurs in the github issue itself: https://github.com/apache/incubator-superset/issues/8574 Do you desire a single place of discussion? Or is it OK for discussion to occur in the github ticket as well the dev-list? -Original Message- From: Erik Ritter Sent

Re: Re: [VOTE] [SIP-26] Proposal for Implementing Connection Pooling for Analytics Database Connections

I think discussion occurring in the Github issue is ideal. However, as I (and many others) don't often view notifications from issues being created, we depend on the [DISCUSS] email to alert us to a new SIP being created. Erik On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 1:57 PM Brannon, Terrence wrote: > It seems

Re: Re: [VOTE] [SIP-26] Proposal for Implementing Connection Pooling for Analytics Database Connections

Yes, sorry I thought we had sent the [DISCUSS] notice pointing to the Github issue a while back. The SIP process is well documented in SIP-0 and we're supposed to send a [DISCUSS] notice to dev@ prior to the vote. Let's revive the convers

Re: [VOTE] [SIP-30] Remove Tabs from SQL Lab

+1 (non-binding). Additional comments left on the Github issue. On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 9:14 AM daniel gaspar wrote: > Hello Superset Community, > > This is a call to vote for SIP-30 Remove Tabs from SQL Lab > > Further details here: > https://github.com/apache/incubator-superset/issues/8655 > >