[jira] [Commented] (SYNCOPE-345) You need to click the Execute synchronization task twice

2013-03-27 Thread fabio martelli (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNCOPE-345?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13615027#comment-13615027 ] fabio martelli commented on SYNCOPE-345: The second click is ignored; just the

[jira] [Resolved] (SYNCOPE-345) You need to click the Execute synchronization task twice

2013-03-27 Thread fabio martelli (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNCOPE-345?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] fabio martelli resolved SYNCOPE-345. Resolution: Not A Problem You need to click the Execute synchronization task twice

[jira] [Commented] (SYNCOPE-345) You need to click the Execute synchronization task twice

2013-03-27 Thread jordi (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNCOPE-345?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13615057#comment-13615057 ] jordi commented on SYNCOPE-345: --- I've tried the refresh (reload) button in the UI, and the

Re: svn commit: r1461564 - /syncope/trunk/pom.xml

2013-03-27 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
+slf4j.version1.7.4/slf4j.version Any reason this can't go up to 1.7.5? There is a big performance improvement in 1.7.5: http://www.slf4j.org/news.html Colm. On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:14 PM, ilgro...@apache.org wrote: Author: ilgrosso Date: Wed Mar 27 13:14:47 2013 New Revision:

[jira] [Assigned] (SYNCOPE-276) Upgrade instructions from 1.0.X to 1.1.0

2013-03-27 Thread JIRA
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNCOPE-276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Francesco Chicchiriccò reassigned SYNCOPE-276: -- Assignee: Francesco Chicchiriccò Upgrade instructions from 1.0.X

[DISCUSS] Migrating users from 1.0.X to 1.1.0

2013-03-27 Thread Francesco Chicchiriccò
Hi all, I am currently reviewing [1] as part of SYNCOPE-276 and I've just realized that, since SYNCOPE-51 removed support for MD5 (as password cipher algorithm), we might have a considerable upgrade problem. What about an existing 1.0.X installation with MD5 passwords? When upgrading to

Re: [VOTE] Apache Syncope 1.0.7

2013-03-27 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
+1. Colm. On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Massimiliano Perrone massimiliano.perr...@tirasa.net wrote: Il 26/03/2013 10:31, Francesco Chicchiriccò ha scritto: I've created a 1.0.7 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: SVN source tag (r1461007):

Re: [DISCUSS] Migrating users from 1.0.X to 1.1.0

2013-03-27 Thread Fabio Martelli
Il giorno 27/mar/2013, alle ore 17.23, Francesco Chicchiriccò ha scritto: Hi all, I am currently reviewing [1] as part of SYNCOPE-276 and I've just realized that, since SYNCOPE-51 removed support for MD5 (as password cipher algorithm), we might have a considerable upgrade problem. What