Re: [DISCUSS] Time for 2.0.7?

2017-12-19 Thread Francesco Chicchiriccò
Hi all, given the consensus, I am about to start the release process. Stay tuned. Regards. On 19/12/2017 08:50, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: Hi all, it seems quite some work has been done for 2.0.7 [1], and I believe the remaining issues [2] can be safely moved to 2.0.8 (or later), hence I

[jira] [Created] (SYNCOPE-1254) Cannot create new connector instances from Admin Console

2017-12-19 Thread JIRA
Francesco Chicchiriccò created SYNCOPE-1254: --- Summary: Cannot create new connector instances from Admin Console Key: SYNCOPE-1254 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNCOPE-1254

Re: [DISCUSS] Time for 2.0.7?

2017-12-19 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
+1. Colm. On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Lorenzo Di Cola wrote: > +1 for me. > > Best Regards > > LDC > > > Il 19/12/2017 08:50, Francesco Chicchiriccò ha scritto: > >> Hi all, >> it seems quite some work has been done for 2.0.7 [1], and I believe the >>

Re: [DISCUSS] Time for 2.0.7?

2017-12-19 Thread Lorenzo Di Cola
+1 for me. Best Regards LDC Il 19/12/2017 08:50, Francesco Chicchiriccò ha scritto: Hi all, it seems quite some work has been done for 2.0.7 [1], and I believe the remaining issues [2] can be safely moved to 2.0.8 (or later), hence I was thinking: what about delivering Apache Syncope 2.0.7

Re: [DISCUSS] Time for 2.0.7?

2017-12-19 Thread Filipe Silva
+1 Filipe Silva On 19-12-2017 07:50, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: Hi all, it seems quite some work has been done for 2.0.7 [1], and I believe the remaining issues [2] can be safely moved to 2.0.8 (or later), hence I was thinking: what about delivering Apache Syncope 2.0.7 as a nice

Re: [DISCUSS] Time for 2.0.7?

2017-12-19 Thread Massimiliano Perrone
+1 Massi Il 19/12/2017 08:50, Francesco Chicchiriccò ha scritto: Hi all, it seems quite some work has been done for 2.0.7 [1], and I believe the remaining issues [2] can be safely moved to 2.0.8 (or later), hence I was thinking: what about delivering Apache Syncope 2.0.7 as a nice

Re: [DISCUSS] Time for 2.0.7?

2017-12-19 Thread Marco Di Sabatino Di Diodoro
Il 19 dicembre 2017 08:50:15 CET, "Francesco Chicchiriccò" ha scritto: >Hi all, >it seems quite some work has been done for 2.0.7 [1], and I believe the > >remaining issues [2] can be safely moved to 2.0.8 (or later), hence I >was thinking: what about delivering Apache

Re: [DISCUSS] Time for 2.0.7?

2017-12-19 Thread Matteo Di Carlo
Hi all, it looks like it is the right moment to me. Matteo. On 19/12/2017 08:50, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: Hi all, it seems quite some work has been done for 2.0.7 [1], and I believe the remaining issues [2] can be safely moved to 2.0.8 (or later), hence I was thinking: what about

Re: [DISCUSS] Time for 2.0.7?

2017-12-19 Thread Matteo Alessandroni
Hi, it sounds very good to me, +1. Regards and merry Christmas to all! Matteo Alessandroni On 19/12/2017 08:50, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: Hi all, it seems quite some work has been done for 2.0.7 [1], and I believe the remaining issues [2] can be safely moved to 2.0.8 (or later), hence I