Re: [DISCUSS] LiveSync

2022-08-18 Thread Francesco Chicchiriccò
On 18/08/22 09:34, Andrea Patricelli wrote: Hi all, I've read the wiki and have only a question ATM: why do we need new mapping, couldn't we rely on the existing mapping and enable/disable livesync by resource and/or provision and/or mapped attributes? I am not sure things will end up being

Re: [DISCUSS] LiveSync

2022-08-18 Thread Francesco Chicchiriccò
On 18/08/22 10:14, Valerio Crescia wrote: Hi all, I am really interested in implementing this new feature in syncope and would like to write my thesis on this work. This sounds great, Valerio! Happy to help and mentor if needed. Regards. On 2022/08/17 07:22:38 Francesco Chicchiriccò

RE: [DISCUSS] LiveSync

2022-08-18 Thread Valerio Crescia
Hi all, I am really interested in implementing this new feature in syncope and would like to write my thesis on this work. Best regards, Valerio Crescia On 2022/08/17 07:22:38 Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: > Hi all, > I have put some considerations about LiveSync in [1]: feel free to

Re: [DISCUSS] LiveSync

2022-08-18 Thread Andrea Patricelli
Hi all, I've read the wiki and have only a question ATM: why do we need new mapping, couldn't we rely on the existing mapping and enable/disable livesync by resource and/or provision and/or mapped attributes? Best regards, Andrea On 17/08/22 09:22, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: Hi all, I