[DISCUSS] Apache Syncope 2.0.5 (take 3)

Discussion thread for vote on 2.0.5 release, with GIT source tag (4d88e9b510014da81291d095830a5ddcae9108c4). For more information on the release process, check out http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html Some of the things to check before voting are: - does "mvn apache-rat:check" pass on the sour

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Syncope 2.0.5

On 06/09/2017 08:56, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: (Replying here as this is DISCUSS thread related to the VOTE in progress) On 05/09/2017 18:26, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: I tried to start the standalone distribution but got the error: org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanDefinitionStoreExce

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Syncope 2.0.5

(Replying here as this is DISCUSS thread related to the VOTE in progress) On 05/09/2017 18:26, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: I tried to start the standalone distribution but got the error: org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanDefinitionStoreException: Invalid bean definition with name 'buildNumbe

[DISCUSS] Apache Syncope 2.0.5

Discussion thread for vote on 2.0.5 release, with GIT source tag (726614b80cd25168637754f88cdb2f9030e77012). For more information on the release process, check out http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html Some of the things to check before voting are: - does "mvn apache-rat:check" pass on the sour

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Syncope 2.0.5

Hi, due to the recent comment in SYNCOPE-1199 by Colm: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNCOPE-1199?focusedCommentId=16152741&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-16152741 and also SYNCOPE-1203 found by Matteo, I will cancel the current vote, fix t

[DISCUSS] Apache Syncope 2.0.5

Discussion thread for vote on 2.0.5 release, with GIT source tag (5c388d4455f58c50c52ee467e81fbac4e2aea017). For more information on the release process, check out http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html Some of the things to check before voting are: - does "mvn apache-rat:check" pass on the sour

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Syncope 2.0.5?

Hi all, FYI I am starting right now. Regards. On 29/08/2017 13:50, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: On 29/08/2017 13:47, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: Yes, sounds good to me. I will have WSS4J 2.1.11 released by early next week, so SYNCOPE-1195

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Syncope 2.0.5?

On 29/08/2017 13:47, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: Yes, sounds good to me. I will have WSS4J 2.1.11 released by early next week, so SYNCOPE-1195 is also a possibility if the vote has not started before then. Good to hear: let's wait then for WSS

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Syncope 2.0.5?

Yes, sounds good to me. I will have WSS4J 2.1.11 released by early next week, so SYNCOPE-1195 is also a possibility if the vote has not started before then. Colm. On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 7:53 AM, Andrea Patricelli < andreapatrice...@apache.org>

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Syncope 2.0.5?

Hi all, Il 28/08/2017 08:33, Francesco Chicchiriccò ha scritto: Hi all, Apache Syncope 2.0.5 already contains several (52) issues done [1], and some others to do [2], but I think that all but SYNCOPE-1198 and SYNCOPE-1200 could be postponed to 2.0.6. Hence, when such two issues are closed, w

[DISCUSS] Apache Syncope 2.0.5?

Hi all, Apache Syncope 2.0.5 already contains several (52) issues done [1], and some others to do [2], but I think that all but SYNCOPE-1198 and SYNCOPE-1200 could be postponed to 2.0.6. Hence, when such two issues are closed, we can think to release 2.0.5. WDYT (In particular, Colm and Andre